Advertisement

Psychometric Tests in the Field of Drawing Based in Timing Measurements

  • C. LopezEmail author
  • F. Lopez
  • L. F. Castillo
  • M. Bedia
  • T. Gomez
  • M. Aguilera
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 292)

Abstract

In the Art Education studies, one of the most interesting trends - in terms of its theoretical foundations- is the phenomena of measuring aesthetic experiences [1],[2]. However, traditionally, the teaching of art has been focused into the technical dimension of the drawings (proportionality, composition, etc.) or in cultural aspects (symbolic role, social criticism, etc.) but the analysis of aesthetic experiences have not acquired such an important status to be scientific analyzed and included in a pedagogical domain. In this paper we propose that, through metrics able to detect the ‘immersion” or “sensitivity” of an artist drawing, it would be possible to get methodological tools capable of measuring aesthetic experiences. In order to explore our hypothesis, we have analyzed the work of students of art in several experiments and we have recorded the traces of the their drawings. The traces have been evaluated and we have tested if fractal timing is found (fractal timing is a ubiquitous clue that indicates that the among the components of a cognitive system exist a coupling). The results of the experiments seem to provide a way to improve some aspects in the daily practice of art teaching and a new way to describe psicometrical parameters.

Keywords

Psychometric Test Detrended Fluctuation Analysis Fractal Timing Aesthetic Experience Cognitive Science Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dewey, J.: Knowing and the known. Beacon Press (1949)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shusterman, R.: Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art, 2nd edn. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furr, M., Bacharach, V.: Psychometrics: An Introduction. SAGE Publications, Inc. (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arden, R., Chavez, R.S., Grazioplene, R., Jung, R.: Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research 214(2) (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hee Kim, K.: A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal 18(1), 3–14 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, New York (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dreyfus, H.: Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Orden, G., Holden, J., Turvey, M.: Self-Organization of Cognitive Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132, 331–350 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holden, J., van Orden, G., Turvey, M.: Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics. Psychological Review 116, 318–342 (2009); van Orden, G., Holden, J., Turvey, M.: Human cognition and 1/f scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134, 117–123 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stephen, D.G., Boncoddo, R.A., Magnuson, J.S., Dixon, J.A.: The dynamics of insight: Mathematical discovery as a phase transition. Memory & Cognition 37, 1132–1149 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dotov, D.G., Nie, L., Chemero, A.: A demonstration of the transition from ready-to-hand to unready-to-hand. PLoS ONE 5(3), e9433 (2010), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009433Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nie, L., Dotov, D., Chemero, A.: Readiness-to-hand, extended cognition, and multifractality. In: Carlson, L., Hoelscher, C., Shipley, T.F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1835–1840. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Interactive Pen Displays & Digital Drawing Tablets, http://www.wacom.com
  14. 14.
    Peng, C., Mietus, J., Hausdorff, J.M., Havlin, S., Stanley, H.E., et al.: Long-range anticorrelations and non-Gaussian behavior of the heartbeat. Physical Review Letters 70, 1343 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Lopez
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. Lopez
    • 1
  • L. F. Castillo
    • 3
    • 4
  • M. Bedia
    • 2
  • T. Gomez
    • 2
  • M. Aguilera
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Physical ExpressionUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Engineering SystemsNational University of ColombiaBogotáColombia
  4. 4.Department of Systems and InformaticsUniversity of CaldasCaldasColombia

Personalised recommendations