Skip to main content

The Foreign Language Classroom in the New Media Age: Videoconferencing and Negotiated Interaction Among L2 Learners

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1375 Accesses

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

This study aims to explore the capabilities of videoconferencing for providing L2 learners with input modification, feedback, and opportunities to produce output through negotiation. The potential of videoconferencing for language learning has already been discussed in literature. Its greatest advantage might lie in giving learners numerous opportunities to come into authentic contact and to interact in real time with native speakers and speakers of other languages. However, unlike most of the studies on videoconferencing and language learning that have focused on interactive contexts with native speakers or with expert speakers, in the present article I would like to discuss the potential of videoconferencing for negotiated interaction among foreign language learners. The students who participated in this investigation, which resulted from collaboration between the University of Bielsko-Biala (Poland) and the University of León (Spain), were from Poland and Spain, respectively (English majors in both cases). Beside the fact that videoconferenced spoken interactions between the students from two different countries were highly valued by the participants, the findings confirm claims made by Courtney (1996) and suggest that also in this particular context, the quantity of negotiation of meaning seems to depend on the particular type of task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berkenkotter, C., and T. Huckin. 1995. Genre knowledge and disciplinary communication: Culture/cognition/power. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B., and D. Krathwohl. 1977. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, C. 1986. The effect of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly 20: 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygate, M. 1987. Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R.A., and M.J. McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide to spoken and written grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapelle, C.A. 2001. Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell O’Callaghan, V. 2012. Engaging L2 undergraduates in relevant project work and interaction: A role for video conferencing. Language Learning in Higher Education 2: 441–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2001. The common European framework of references for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2013.

  • Courtney, M. 1996. Talking to learn: Selecting and using peer group oral task. English Language Teaching 50: 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, P. 1998. A classroom perspective on negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 19: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, L., and R. Carter. 2007. Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics 28: 410–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S. 2001. Videoconferencing with the French-speaking world: A user’s guide. Foreign Language Annals 34: 152–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, R., P. Ware, and M. Warschauer. 2004. Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., and D. Craig. 2012. Validation of a videoconferenced speaking test. Computer Assisted Language Learning 25: 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinginger, C., and J.A. Belz. 2005. Sociocultural perspectives on pragmatic development in foreign language learning: Microgenetic case studies from telecollaboration and residence abroad. Intercultural Pragmatics 2: 369–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T., Ch. Comber, J. Gage, and A. Cullum-Hanshaw. 2010. Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19: 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. 2007. Fostering second language oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop videoconferencing. Foreign Language Annals 40: 635–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M., and G. Stockwell. 2006. CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. 1996. The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of second language acquisition, vol. 2, ed. W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia, 413–478. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loranc-Paszylk, B. 2011. Exploring the potential of videoconferencing in foreign language teaching for speaking skills development: evidence from a case study. Scientific Bulletin - Education Sciences Series 2: 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. 2005. Seeing is believing: The role of videoconferencing in distance learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 36: 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dowd, R. 2000. Intercultural learning via videoconferencing: A pilot exchange project. ReCALL 12: 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcelik, H., and Z. Zoltay-Paprika. 2010. Developing emotional awareness in cross-cultural communication: A videoconferencing approach. Journal of Management Education 34: 671–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. 2010. The perceived value of videoconferencing with primary pupils learning to speak a modern language. Language Learning Journal 38: 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pica, T. 1987. Interlanguage adjustments as an outcome on NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning 37: 563–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, T., and C. Doughty. 1985. Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In Input in second language acquisition, ed. S.M. Gass and C.G. Madden, 115–136. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, T., R. Kanagy, and J. Falodun. 1993. Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction. In Tasks in a pedagogical context, ed. G. Crookes and S.M. Gass, 9–34. Cleveland, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics 11: 129–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. 1980. Error correction as an interactional resource. In Discourse analysis in second language research, ed. D. Larsen-Freeman, 138–153. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. 2003. Online videoconferencing: An application to teacher education. JSTE E Journal 18: 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in second language acquisition, ed. S.M. Gass and C. Madden, 235–256. New York: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning, ed. J.P. Lantolf, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varonis, E., and S. Gass. 1985. Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 6: 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. 2006. Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL 18: 122–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. 2007. Task design in videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. CALICO Journal 24: 590–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C. 2003. Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. 1991. Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanguas, I. 2010. Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time! Language Learning and Technology 14: 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Loranc-Paszylk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loranc-Paszylk, B. (2015). The Foreign Language Classroom in the New Media Age: Videoconferencing and Negotiated Interaction Among L2 Learners. In: Piasecka, L., Adams-Tukiendorf, M., Wilk, P. (eds) New Media and Perennial Problems in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07686-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics