Advertisement

Conceiving the Earth Itself as Our Garden

  • W. S. K. CameronEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 21)

Abstract

In this chapter, Scott Cameron contends that the North American and European perspectives on nature both capture essential but partial truths. The North American focus on wilderness occludes two very different perspectives under which the world was ‘always already’ humanized: the ancient, biblical view of the first humans as co-creators of the world (Adam and Eve as the namers, analogues of which are still common in many aboriginal wisdom traditions), and Nietzsche’s post-modern variant celebrating our recreating the world by re-naming and re-valuing it. On both these views, the Earth is originally ours, both as home and in trust as our garden. Yet there is, nonetheless, an important warning in the romantic aspiration to commune with nature unsullied. Cameron’s goal is to highlight an inescapable but productive tension between understanding the world as already humanized and desiring to respect its inherent value. He stresses that we can achieve the latter only by recognizing the former; and he proposes the ancient metaphor of the earth as a garden to help keep both perspectives in view.

Keywords

Ordinary Language Language Game Standpoint Theory Linguistic Turn Willful Blindness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Augustine. 1995. De doctrina Christiana. Oxford early Christian texts, ed. and trans. R.P.H. Green. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beard, M. 2007. The Roman triumph. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bekoff, M. 2002. Minding animals: Awareness, emotions, and heart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bermúdez, J.L. 2003. Thinking without words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callicott, J.B. 1991. The wilderness idea revisited: The sustainable development alternative. The Environmental Professional 13: 235–247.Google Scholar
  6. Callicott, J.B. 1995. Deep grammar. Wild Earth 5(1): 64–66.Google Scholar
  7. Callicott, J.B., and M.P. Nelson (eds.). 1998. The great new wilderness debate. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, W.S.K. 1996. On communicative actors talking past one another: The Gadamer-Habermas debate. Philosophy Today 40: 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, W.S.K. 2005. The genesis and justification of feminist standpoint theory in Hegel and Lukács. Dialogue and Universalism 15: 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, D.E. 2006. A philosophy of gardens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crist, E. 2004. Against the social construction of nature and wilderness. Environmental Ethics 26(1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronon, W. 1995. The trouble with wilderness; Or, getting back to the wrong nature. In Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature, 379–408. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  13. Descartes, R. 1998. Discourse on method, 3rd ed, Trans. Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, J. 2005. Guns, germs and steel. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  15. Drenthen, M., and J. Keulartz (eds.). 2014. Environmental aesthetics. Crossing divides and breaking ground. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fish, S. 2011. Dorothy and the tree: A lesson in epistemology. New York Times, April 15.Google Scholar
  17. Fox Keller, E. 2009. Interview for the CBC radio program “Ideas: On how to think about science”. CBC Radio, broadcast January 30, 2009. Also available at: http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/episodes/2009/01/02/how-to-think-about-science-part-1—-24-listen/#episode14. Accessed 31 Dec 2013.
  18. Gadamer, H.-G. [1989] 2004. Truth and method, 2nd rev. ed, Trans. and revised J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall. New York: Crossroads.Google Scholar
  19. Griffin, D.R. 2001. Animal minds: Beyond cognition to consciousness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Guha, R. 1989. Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A third world critique. Environmental Ethics 11(1): 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habermas, J. 1977. A review of Gadamer’s truth and method. In Understanding and social inquiry, ed. F.R. Dallmayr and T.A. McCarthy, Trans. F.R. Dallmayr and T.A. McCarthy, 335–363. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, J.A., et al. 2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14(2): 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hauser, M.D. 2000. Wild minds: What animals really think. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  25. Hegel, G.W.F. 1979. The phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kuhn, Th. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Louth, A. 1989. Augustine on language. Journal of Literature and Theology 3(2): 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKibben, B. 1989. The end of nature. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  29. Nelson, M.P., and J.B. Callicott (eds.). 2008. The wilderness debate rages on; Continuing the great new wilderness debate. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nietzsche, F. 1974. Gay science. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  31. Peterson, A. 1999. Environmental ethics and the social construction of ethics. Environmental Ethics 21(4): 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plato. 1993. Phaedo. Oxford World’s Classics. Trans. D. Gallop. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rolston III, H. 1991. The wilderness idea reaffirmed. The Environmental Professional 13: 370–377.Google Scholar
  34. Stubington, J. 2007. Singing the land: The Power of performance in aboriginal life. Strawberry Hills: Currency House.Google Scholar
  35. Watson, G. 1982. St. Augustine’s theory of language. The Maynooth Review 6(2): 4–20.Google Scholar
  36. White, L. 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155: 1203–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wittgenstein, L. 2009. Philosophical investigations, 4th ed, ed. and trans. P.M.S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Wynne, B. 2009. Interview for the CBC radio program “Ideas: On how to think about science”. CBC Radio, broadcast January 30, 2009. Also available at: http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/episodes/2009/01/02/how-to-think-about-science-part-1—-24-listen/#episode10. Accessed 31 Dec 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyLoyola Marymount UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations