Skip to main content

Evaluation of Sweetpotato Varieties for the Potential of Dual-Purpose in Different Agroecological Zones of Kenya

Abstract

Smallholder dairy farming is important in Kenya, however reducing farms into subdivisions over the past four decades has resulted in small farms. Meeting the nutritional requirements of high yielding dairy cows is now a constant challenge to the farmers especially during the dry season. Sweetpotato is a potential source of food and feed for smallholder farmers. The high biomass yield and quality of sweetpotato storage roots and vines are two of the most important factors that deserve attention when it is used as a feed. The present study evaluated six cultivars of sweetpotato for their potential as dual-purpose crops, biomass yield, and quality in different agroecological zones in Kenya. Six cultivars of sweetpotato were grown on farms in five sites located in the Central, South, and North Rift Valley regions of Kenya under rain-fed conditions. Two sites each were located in the high and medium altitude area while one was located in the low altitude area. All sites have a warm climate except the one at high altitude that experiences a cold climate. The cultivars were 103001, Gweri, Kemb-23, Kemb-36, Naspot-1, and Wagabolige. The vines of each variety were harvested at two different stages (75 and 150 days) post-planting. The 75-day treatment was ratooned again at 150 days post-planting. Agronomic observations were carried out during the long rainy season in 2010. Harvesting vines twice significantly (P < 001) increased forage yields but significantly reduced root yield in all the varieties. Gweri variety realized the highest forage yield but the lowest storage root yield indicating its potential as a forage variety. Kemb23, Kemb36, and Naspot1 produced appreciable amounts of vines and the highest root storage yield showing their potential as dual-purpose varieties. The effect of cultivar on forage yield varied with time of harvest. There was a high interaction between the cultivars and stage of harvest at 150 days after planting. Gweri, Kemb 23, and Kemb 36 showed some level of interaction with stage of harvesting at 150 days after planting. Across AEZs vine yields (t/DM/ha) ranged from 0.9 t/ha at high altitude (dry), 2.4 at high altitude (wet), 1.7 at low altitude (dry), and 2.8 medium altitude (wet). The root to vine ratios (R/V) obtained classifies cultivar 103001 as a low forage-high storage root cultivar while Gweri was classified as a forage cultivar in all AEZs. Four other varieties (Kemb‐23, Naspot‐1, Wagabolige, and Kemb 36) were identified as “best bet” dual-purpose varieties. Harvesting sweetpotato plants twice at 75 and 150 days post-planting increased vine yield by 34 % but also reduced tuber yields by 54 %. The practical implications of these results is that farmers in each AEZ will have at least one suitable forage, dual-purpose or root variety to choose from depending on the feed needs on farms.

Keywords

  • Sweetpotato
  • Root yield
  • Vine yield

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   160.49
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   219.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR   219.99
Price includes VAT (Finland)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 18.1
Fig. 18.2
Fig 18.3
Fig 18.4
Fig 18.5

References

  • Dahniya MT (1979) Ratooning and grafting studies of cassava and sweetpotatoes. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton DJ (1988) Underground crops. Long term trends in production of roots and tubers. Winrock International, Morrilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kariuki JN, Gitau GK, Gachuiri CK, Tamminga S, Bruchem V, Muia JMK, Irungu KRG (1998) Effect of feeding Napier grass, Lucerne and sweetpotato vines as sole diets to dairy heifers on nutrient intake, weight gain and rumen degradation. Livest Prod Sci 55:13–20

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Larbi A, Etela I, Nwokocha HN, Oji UI, Anyanwu NJ, Gbaraneh LD, Anioke SC, Balogun RO, Muhammad IR (2007) Fodder and tuber yields, and fodder quality of sweetpotato cultivars at different maturity stages in West African humid forest and savanna zones. Anim Feed Sci Technol 135:126–138

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leon-Velarde CU (2001) Using competing traits to select dual-purpose sweetpotato in native germplasm. In: Program report 1999–2000; International Potato Center, CIP, pp 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon-Velarde CU, Roca J, Arteaga J, Quispe L, Parraga A (1997) Perspectives on sweetpotato: dual-purpose varieties. In: Program report 1995–1997; International Potato Center, CIP, pp 291–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukuyu B, Franzel S, Ongadi PM, Duncan AJ (2011) Livestock feed resources: current production and management practices in central and northern rift valley provinces of Kenya. Livest Res Rural Dev. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/5/luku23112.htm

  • Mannan MA, Bhuiyan MKR, Quasem A, Rashid MM, Siddique MA (1992) Study on growth and partitioning of dry matter in sweetpotato. J Root Crop 18:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • May D, Scheuerman B (1998) Sweetpotato production in California. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Publication 7237, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • NIRS (2012) (NIRS)™ DS2500 Feed Analyzer technology. http://www.foss.dk/industry-solution/products/nirs-ds2500-feed-analyzer

  • Nwinyi SCO (1992) Effect of age of shoot removal on tuber and shoot yields at harvest of five sweetpotato cultivars. Field Crop Res 29(1):47–54

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Olorunnisomo OA (2007) Yield and quality of sweetpotato forage pruned at different intervals for West African dwarf sheep. Livest Res Rur Dev 19(3):2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Paneque Ramirez G (1992) Cultivation, harvesting and storage of sweetpotato products. In: Machin D, Nyvold S (eds) Proceedings of FAO Expert consultation held in CIAT, Cali, Colombia, 21–25 January 1991. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 95, pp 203–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters D (2008) Assessment of the potential of sweetpotato as livestock feed in East Africa: Rwanda, Uganda, and Kenya. A survey report. The International Potato Center (CIP), Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz ME (1982) Sweetpotatoes (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam) for beef production: agronomic and conservation aspects and animal responses. In: Villareal RB, Griggs TD (eds) Proceedings 1st international symposium on sweetpotato. Asian Vegetable Research Development Center, Shanshua, pp 439–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Van An L, Bodil E, Lindberg F, Lindberg JE (2003) Effect of harvesting interval and defoliation on yield and chemical composition of leaves, stems and tubers of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam.) cultivars. Field Crop Res 82(1):49–58

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wanda WC (1995) New crop fact sheet: sweetpotato: Purdue University Centre for New crops and Plant produce. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/searcengine.html

  • Woolf JA (1992) Sweetpotato: an untapped food resource. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 643 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by the International Potato Centre (CIP) and was jointly implemented in collaboration with the East African Dairy Development project (EADD) in Kenya and Rwanda; however, CIP and EADD can accept no responsibility for any views or conclusions presented here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. A. Lukuyu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lukuyu, B.A., Kinyua, J., Agili, S., Gachuiri, C.K., Low, J. (2014). Evaluation of Sweetpotato Varieties for the Potential of Dual-Purpose in Different Agroecological Zones of Kenya. In: Vanlauwe, B., van Asten, P., Blomme, G. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural Intensification of the Humid Highland Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07662-1_18

Download citation