Abstract
Smallholder dairy farming is important in Kenya, however reducing farms into subdivisions over the past four decades has resulted in small farms. Meeting the nutritional requirements of high yielding dairy cows is now a constant challenge to the farmers especially during the dry season. Sweetpotato is a potential source of food and feed for smallholder farmers. The high biomass yield and quality of sweetpotato storage roots and vines are two of the most important factors that deserve attention when it is used as a feed. The present study evaluated six cultivars of sweetpotato for their potential as dual-purpose crops, biomass yield, and quality in different agroecological zones in Kenya. Six cultivars of sweetpotato were grown on farms in five sites located in the Central, South, and North Rift Valley regions of Kenya under rain-fed conditions. Two sites each were located in the high and medium altitude area while one was located in the low altitude area. All sites have a warm climate except the one at high altitude that experiences a cold climate. The cultivars were 103001, Gweri, Kemb-23, Kemb-36, Naspot-1, and Wagabolige. The vines of each variety were harvested at two different stages (75 and 150 days) post-planting. The 75-day treatment was ratooned again at 150 days post-planting. Agronomic observations were carried out during the long rainy season in 2010. Harvesting vines twice significantly (P < 001) increased forage yields but significantly reduced root yield in all the varieties. Gweri variety realized the highest forage yield but the lowest storage root yield indicating its potential as a forage variety. Kemb23, Kemb36, and Naspot1 produced appreciable amounts of vines and the highest root storage yield showing their potential as dual-purpose varieties. The effect of cultivar on forage yield varied with time of harvest. There was a high interaction between the cultivars and stage of harvest at 150 days after planting. Gweri, Kemb 23, and Kemb 36 showed some level of interaction with stage of harvesting at 150 days after planting. Across AEZs vine yields (t/DM/ha) ranged from 0.9 t/ha at high altitude (dry), 2.4 at high altitude (wet), 1.7 at low altitude (dry), and 2.8 medium altitude (wet). The root to vine ratios (R/V) obtained classifies cultivar 103001 as a low forage-high storage root cultivar while Gweri was classified as a forage cultivar in all AEZs. Four other varieties (Kemb‐23, Naspot‐1, Wagabolige, and Kemb 36) were identified as “best bet” dual-purpose varieties. Harvesting sweetpotato plants twice at 75 and 150 days post-planting increased vine yield by 34 % but also reduced tuber yields by 54 %. The practical implications of these results is that farmers in each AEZ will have at least one suitable forage, dual-purpose or root variety to choose from depending on the feed needs on farms.
Keywords
- Sweetpotato
- Root yield
- Vine yield
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptions




References
Dahniya MT (1979) Ratooning and grafting studies of cassava and sweetpotatoes. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Horton DJ (1988) Underground crops. Long term trends in production of roots and tubers. Winrock International, Morrilton
Kariuki JN, Gitau GK, Gachuiri CK, Tamminga S, Bruchem V, Muia JMK, Irungu KRG (1998) Effect of feeding Napier grass, Lucerne and sweetpotato vines as sole diets to dairy heifers on nutrient intake, weight gain and rumen degradation. Livest Prod Sci 55:13–20
Larbi A, Etela I, Nwokocha HN, Oji UI, Anyanwu NJ, Gbaraneh LD, Anioke SC, Balogun RO, Muhammad IR (2007) Fodder and tuber yields, and fodder quality of sweetpotato cultivars at different maturity stages in West African humid forest and savanna zones. Anim Feed Sci Technol 135:126–138
Leon-Velarde CU (2001) Using competing traits to select dual-purpose sweetpotato in native germplasm. In: Program report 1999–2000; International Potato Center, CIP, pp 289–294
Leon-Velarde CU, Roca J, Arteaga J, Quispe L, Parraga A (1997) Perspectives on sweetpotato: dual-purpose varieties. In: Program report 1995–1997; International Potato Center, CIP, pp 291–294
Lukuyu B, Franzel S, Ongadi PM, Duncan AJ (2011) Livestock feed resources: current production and management practices in central and northern rift valley provinces of Kenya. Livest Res Rural Dev. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/5/luku23112.htm
Mannan MA, Bhuiyan MKR, Quasem A, Rashid MM, Siddique MA (1992) Study on growth and partitioning of dry matter in sweetpotato. J Root Crop 18:1–5
May D, Scheuerman B (1998) Sweetpotato production in California. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Publication 7237, USA
NIRS (2012) (NIRS)™ DS2500 Feed Analyzer technology. http://www.foss.dk/industry-solution/products/nirs-ds2500-feed-analyzer
Nwinyi SCO (1992) Effect of age of shoot removal on tuber and shoot yields at harvest of five sweetpotato cultivars. Field Crop Res 29(1):47–54
Olorunnisomo OA (2007) Yield and quality of sweetpotato forage pruned at different intervals for West African dwarf sheep. Livest Res Rur Dev 19(3):2007
Paneque Ramirez G (1992) Cultivation, harvesting and storage of sweetpotato products. In: Machin D, Nyvold S (eds) Proceedings of FAO Expert consultation held in CIAT, Cali, Colombia, 21–25 January 1991. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 95, pp 203–215
Peters D (2008) Assessment of the potential of sweetpotato as livestock feed in East Africa: Rwanda, Uganda, and Kenya. A survey report. The International Potato Center (CIP), Nairobi, Kenya
Ruiz ME (1982) Sweetpotatoes (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam) for beef production: agronomic and conservation aspects and animal responses. In: Villareal RB, Griggs TD (eds) Proceedings 1st international symposium on sweetpotato. Asian Vegetable Research Development Center, Shanshua, pp 439–451
Van An L, Bodil E, Lindberg F, Lindberg JE (2003) Effect of harvesting interval and defoliation on yield and chemical composition of leaves, stems and tubers of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam.) cultivars. Field Crop Res 82(1):49–58
Wanda WC (1995) New crop fact sheet: sweetpotato: Purdue University Centre for New crops and Plant produce. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/searcengine.html
Woolf JA (1992) Sweetpotato: an untapped food resource. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 643 pp
Acknowledgement
This work was funded by the International Potato Centre (CIP) and was jointly implemented in collaboration with the East African Dairy Development project (EADD) in Kenya and Rwanda; however, CIP and EADD can accept no responsibility for any views or conclusions presented here.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lukuyu, B.A., Kinyua, J., Agili, S., Gachuiri, C.K., Low, J. (2014). Evaluation of Sweetpotato Varieties for the Potential of Dual-Purpose in Different Agroecological Zones of Kenya. In: Vanlauwe, B., van Asten, P., Blomme, G. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural Intensification of the Humid Highland Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07662-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07662-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07661-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07662-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)
