An Ontology-Based Approach to Competency Modeling and Management in Learning Networks

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 296)

Abstract

With the emergence of the paradigm of Lifelong Learning and the proliferation of the terms "knowledge society", "citizen mobility", or "globalization", competency-based learning and training has known a growing interest in technology-enhanced learning as it provides important benefits for both individuals and organizations by supporting the transformation of learning outcomes into permanent and valuable knowledge assets. In this context, to promote the acquisition and continuous development of new competencies, learning networks have emerged that enables to support the provision of various lifelong learning opportunities. However, lifelong competency development still faces numerous challenges and research issues that need to be addressed, primarily the lack of consensus about a common representation of competencies and competency profiles. This paper analyzes different approaches reported in literature for competency modeling and proposes a competency ontology to formally describe competency-related characteristics of actors and learning resources in learning networks. The proposed ontology also aims to model aspects related to competency information management and tracking in order to support lifelong competency development in learning networks.

Keywords

competency competency profile lifelong competency development learning network ontology technology-enhanced learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Antoniou, G., Harmelen, F.: Web ontology language: OWL. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 67–92. Springer, Berlin (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beer, S.: Lifelong learning: debates and discourses. Paper submitted to NIACE’s Lifelong Learning Inquiry (2007), http://www.niace.org.uk/lifelonglearninginquiry/docs/ConceptualisingLLL.pdf
  3. 3.
    Coi, J.L., Herder, E., Koesling, A., Lofi, C., Olmedilla, D., Papapetrou, O., Siberski, W.: A model for competence gap analysis. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2007), Barcelona, Spain (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DC, Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description (2003), http://dublincore.org/documents/2003/02/04/dces/
  5. 5.
    EQF. The European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (EQF) (2008), http://ec.europa.eu/education/pub/pdf/general/eqf/broch_en.pdf
  6. 6.
    Hotte, R., Basque, J., Page-Lamarche, V., Ruelland, D.: Ingénierie des compétences et scénarisation pédagogique. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education 4(2), 38–56 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    HR-XML. HR-XML Competencies (Measurable Characteristics) (2006), http://xml.coverpages.org/HR-XML-Competencies-1_0.pdf
  8. 8.
    IEEE RCD. IEEE std 1484.20.1-2007 IEEE standard for learning technology-data model for reusable competency definitions (2008), http://www.doleta.gov/usworkforce/pdf/2007-IEEEcomp.pdf
  9. 9.
    IMS RDCEO. IMS reusable definition of competency or educational objective specification (2002), http://www.imsglobal.org/competencies/
  10. 10.
    Koper, R., Rusman, E., Sloep, P.B.: Effective Learning Networks. Journal of Lifelong Learning in Europe, 18–27 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lantz, A., Friedrich, P.: Learning in the workplace: An instrument for competence assessment. The Learning Organization 10(3), 185–194 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140, 1–55 (1932)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malzahn, N., Ziebarth, S., Hoppe, H.U.: Semi-automatic creation and exploitation of competence ontologies for trend aware profiling, matching and planning. Knowledge Management & E-Learning 5(1), 84–103 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mansfield, R.S.: Building competency models: Approaches for HR professionals. Human Resource Management 35, 7–18 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miao, Y., Sloep, P., Hummel, H., Koper, R.: Improving the unreliability of competence information: an argumentation to apply information fusion in learning networks. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL) 19(4/5/6), 366–380 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miles, A., Bechhofer, S.: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  17. 17.
    Najjar, J., Grant, S., Simon, B., Derntl, M., Klobucar, T., Crespo, R.M., Kloos, C.D., Nguyen-Ngoc, A.V., Pawlowski, J., Hoel, T., Oberhuemer, P.: Isure: Model for describing learning needs and learning opportunities taking context ontology modelling into account (2010), http://www.icoper.org/deliverables/ICOPER_D2.2.pdf
  18. 18.
    Ng, A., Hatala, M.: Ontology-based approach to formalization of competencies. In: Competencies in Organizational e-Learning: Concepts and Tools, pp. 185–206. Idea Group, Hershey (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ostyn, C.: Distilling Competency Information. White Paper (2005), http://www.ostyn.com/standardswork/competency/Distilling%20competency%20information.htm
  20. 20.
    Paquette, G.: An ontology and a software framework for competency modeling and management. Educational Technology & Society 10(3), 1–21 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Protégé. The protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system (2007), http://protege.stanford.edu/
  22. 22.
    Rezgui, K., Mhiri, H., Ghédira, K.: Competency Models: A Review of Initiatives. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Rome, Italy, pp. 141–142 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rogushina, J., Gladun, A.: Ontology-based Competency Analyses in New Research Domains. Journal of Computing and Information Technology 20(4), 277–291 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sampson, D.G., Fytros, D.: Competence models in technology-enhanced competence-based learning. In: International Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, pp. 155–177. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sampson, D.G.: Competence-related metadata for educational resources that support lifelong competence development programmes. Educational Technology & Society 12(4), 149–159 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmidt, A., Kunzmann, C.: Towards a Human Resource Development Ontology for Combining Competence Management and Technology-Enhanced Workplace Learning. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2006 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4278, pp. 1078–1087. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sicilia, M.A.: Ontology-based competency management: Infrastructures for the knowledge intensive learning organization. In: Intelligent Learning Infrastructures in Knowledge Intensive Organizations: A Semantic Web Perspective, pp. 302–324. Idea Group, Hershey (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sitthisak, O., Gilbert, L., Soonklang: Integrating Competence Models with Knowledge Space Theory for Assessment (2013), http://caaconference.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Sitthisak_caa2013_submission.pdf
  29. 29.
    Sitthisak, O., Gilbert, L., Albert, D.: Adaptive Learning Using an Integration of Competence Model with Knowledge Space Theory. In: IIAI International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI AAI), Matsue, Japan, pp. 199–202 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sloep, P.B.: Building a Learning Network through Ad-Hoc Transient Communities. In: International Conference on Computer Mediated Social Networking, Dunedin, New Zealand (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kalthoum Rezgui
    • 1
  • Hédia Mhiri
    • 1
  • Khaled Ghédira
    • 1
  1. 1.SOIEUniversity of TunisTunisTunisie

Personalised recommendations