Further Investigation of the Effects of Font Styles on Perceived Visual Aesthetics of Website Interface Design

  • Ahamed Altaboli
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8520)


Findings of an earlier study indicated that a webpage using the "Times New Roman" font type was perceived as having better visual aesthetics than a webpage using the "Calibri" font type. The current study is a continuation of this research, the purpose of the study is to investigate how using a mixture of the two font types in the same webpage would affect perception of visual aesthetics. Four webpage designs were compared in the current study; the two designs used in the earlier study and another two designs containing a mixture of both fonts. Results showed that mixing the two font types on the same page didn’t improve perception of visual aesthetics. Still, the webpage design with only the Times New Roman font type perceived as having a better visual aesthetics than all the other three designs.


font style font type perceived visual aesthetics website interface design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Altaboli, A.: Investigating the effects of font styles on perceived visual aesthetics of website interface design. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction, Part I, HCII 2013. LNCS, vol. 8004, pp. 549–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernard, M., Chaparro, B., Mills, M., Halcomb, C.: Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readability of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 59, 823–835 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Angeli, A., Sutcliffe, A., Hartmann, J.: Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users’ preferences? In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, PA (June 2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dix, A., Finlay, D., Abowd, G., Beale, R.: Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd edn. Pearson Education (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ling, J., Van Schaik, P.: The influence of font type and line length on visual search and information retrieval in web pages. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 64, 395–404 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laviea, T., Tractinsky, N.: Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 60, 269–298 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moshagen, M., Thielsch, M.T.: Facets of visual aesthetics. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68(10), 689–709 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sheedy, J., Subbaram, M., Zimmerman, A., Hayes, J.: Text Legibility and the Letter Superiority Effect. Human Factors 47(4), 797–815 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Schaik, P., Ling, J.: The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 67, 79–89 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahamed Altaboli
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of BenghaziBenghaziLibya

Personalised recommendations