Advertisement

Health Care Professionals vs Other Professionals: Do They Have Different Perceptions about Health Care Waste and Dangerous Products Pictograms? Some Findings Using a Digital Device in Field Survey

  • Cláudia Renata Mont’Alvão
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8519)

Abstract

This paper presents a part of a wider research about GHS symbols comprehensibility. Here, a field survey was conducted using a digital device, instead of traditional platform – printed paper. Participants were health care professionals and other professionals and a comparison among the results about these groups is presented and discussed.

Keywords

symbols comprehensibility testing ergonomics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ABIQUIM, Associação Brasileira da Indústria Química (2005). Departamento de Assuntos Técnicos. A868q O que é o GHS? Sistema harmonizado globalmente para a classificação e rotulagem de produtos químicos, 69 p. ABIQUIM/DETEC, Paulo (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American National Standard Institute. ANSI Z535.3-2011: Criteria for safety symbols. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hesse, R.G., Steele, N.H., Kalsher, M.J., Mont’Alvao, C.: Evaluating Hazard Symbols for the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Hazard Communication. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54, 1832–1836 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalsher, M.J., Mont’Alvão, C.: Communicating Risk in a Global Economy: Emerging Issues Associated with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Labeling Hazardous Chemicals. In: Proceedings of 10º ERGODESIGN, pp. 1–17. PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    UNECE, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. GHS Globally Harmonized System for Labeling Hazardous Chemicals for Hazard Communication, 5th revised edn. New York and Geneva, United Nations, 529 p. (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cláudia Renata Mont’Alvão
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Ergodesign and Usability of Interfaces LEUIPontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro PUC-RioRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations