Advertisement

Human-Bed Interaction: A Methodology and Tool to Measure Postural Behavior during Sleep of the Air Force Military

  • Gustavo Desouzart
  • Ernesto Filgueiras
  • Filipe Melo
  • Rui Matos
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8519)

Abstract

The behavioral and postural habits and sleep rhythm of air force military change depending on the specialty work at the airbase or other types of events but we did not find anything in the literature to analyze and evaluate this behavior through sleep disorders. Perhaps this is related to the fact that the evaluation of this behavior is complex and the observation of these postural behaviors in the environmental context is needed. However the observation methodology based on ISEE software [9] allows the classification and registration of postural behaviors for long periods of time and can be applied in this context. This paper presents a study whose objective was to research the human interaction with postural behaviors during sleep in the residences’ bedrooms of male air force military during the periods in which the subjects were asleep, awake, out of bed, doing activities, using a pillow in different time periods and with ecological validation with observation method and Visual Analogical Scale (VAS). A sample of 8666 observations, which corresponds to 240 sleep-hours of 12 air force military, was classified into six (6) Interaction Categories (IC). The results show that 50,2% of the participants presented the Lateral position (25,38% on the left and 24,86% on the right) as the most common postural behavior during sleep and 94,1% used only one pillow under their head. In the IC´s, the most common interactions were sleep period using the pillow with 66,47%, followed by category Out of bed with 25,32% and followed the category the activities and using the pillow with 6,95%. Findings of this study allow suggesting what graphical interface designers must seek as new strategies and solutions for behavior change in posture in bed, exploring other peripheral equipment for sleep position; or, at least, to improve the posture of the participants when using the number and the placement of the pillow in bed and if these Ergonomic changes can influence the reduction in back pain indications.

Keywords

sleeping position air force military product interaction health care professionals procedures back pain ISEE 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersson, H., Ejlertsson, G., Leden, I., Rosenberg, C.: Chronic pain in a geographically defined general population: studies of differences in age, gender, social class, and pain localization. Clin. J. Pain 9, 174–182 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergqvist, U.: Visual display terminal work-a perspective on long-term changes and discomforts. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 16(3), 201–209 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen, S., Nguyen, C., Kapoor, S., Anderson-Barnes, V., Foster, L., Shields, C., Mclean, B., Wichman, T., Plunkett, A.: Back pain during war: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Arch. Intern. Med. 169, 1916–1923 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen, S., Brown, C., Kurihara, C., Plunkett, A., Nguyen, C., Strassels, S.: Diagnoses and factors associated with medical evacuation and return to duty for service members participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 375, 301–309 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Bruijn, I., Engels, J., Van Der Gulden, J.: A simple method to evaluate the reliability of OWAS observations. Applied Ergonomics (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Desouzart, G., Matos, R., Melo, F., Filgueiras, E.: Effects of Sleeping Position on the Back Pain in Physically Active Seniors: A controlled pilot study. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation (in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engström, T., Medbo, P.: Data collection and analysis of manual work using video recording and personal computer techniques. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19(4), 291–298 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenety, A., Walker, J.: Short-Term Effects of Workstation Exercises on Musculoskeletal Discomfort and Postural Changes in Seated Video Display Unit Workers. Physical Therapy (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Filgueiras, E., Rebelo, F., Moreira Da Silva, F.: Support of the upper limbs of office workers during a daily work. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forsman, M., Hansson, G., Medbo, L., Asterland, P., Engström, T.: A method for evaluation of manual work using synchronised video recordings and physiological measurements. Applied Ergonomics 33(6), 533–540 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geldhof, E., Clercq, D., Bourdeaudhuij, I., Cardon, G.: Classroom postures of 8–12 year old children. Ergonomics 50(10), 1571–1581 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haex, B.: Back and Bed: Ergonomic Aspects of Sleeping. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hendrick, H., Kleiner, B.: Macroergonomics: An Introduction to Work System Design. Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, A., Hsia, K.: Multimodal Sleeping Posture Classification. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 4336–4339. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kazmierczak, K., Mathiassen, S., Neumann, P., Winkel, J.: Observer reliability of industrial activity analysis based on video recordings. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36(3), 275–282 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lincoln, A., Smith, G., Amoroso, P., Bell, N.: The natural history and risk factors of musculoskeletal conditions resulting in disability among US Army personnel. Work 18, 99–113 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mantyselka, P., Kumpusalo, E., Ahonen, R., Kumpusalo, A., Kauhanen, J., Viinamaki, H., Halonen, P., Takala, J.: Pain as a reason to visit the doctor: a study in Finnish primary health care. Pain 89, 175–180 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pter, J.: Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular diseases. In: Guilleminaut, C., Partinen, M. (eds.) Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: Clinical no Treatment. Ravem Press, Nova York (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rebelo, F., Filgueiras, E., Soares, M.: Behavior Video: A Methodology and Tool to Measure the Human Behavior: Examples in Product Evaluation. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Consumer Product Design: Methods and Techniques. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Silva, A., Punt, T., Sharples, P., Vilas-Boas, J., Johnson, M.: Head posture assessment for patients with neck pain: Is it useful? International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 16(1) (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spielholz, P., Silverstein, B., Morgan, M., Checkoway, H., Kaufman, J.: Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics 44(6), 588–613 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stang, P., Von Korff, M., Galer, B.: Reduced labor force participation among primary care patients with headache. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 13, 296–302 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sternbach, R.: Pain and ‘hassles’ in the United States: findings of the Nuprin pain report. Pain 27, 69–80 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stewart, W., Ricci, J., Chee, E., Morganstein, D., Lipton, R.: Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA 290, 2443–2454 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Straker, L., Pollock, C., Mangharam, J.: The effect of shoulder posture on performance, discomfort and muscle fatigue whilst working on a visual display unit. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 20(1), 1–10 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures, and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park (1990)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vieira, E., Kumar, S.: Working Postures: A Literature Review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 14(2) (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walker, B., Muller, R., Grant, W.: Low back pain in Australian adults: prevalence and associated disability. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 27, 238–244 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gustavo Desouzart
    • 1
  • Ernesto Filgueiras
    • 2
  • Filipe Melo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Rui Matos
    • 4
  1. 1.Motor Behavior Laboratory, Faculty of Human KineticsUniversity of LisbonLeiriaPortugal
  2. 2.LabCom - University of Beira InteriorPortugal
  3. 3.Faculty of Human Kineticsthe Technical University of LisbonPortugal
  4. 4.School of Education and Social SciencesPolytechnic Institute of LeiriaPortugal

Personalised recommendations