The Design and Evaluation of Intelligent Energy Dashboard for Sustainability in the Workplace

  • Ray Yun
  • Azizan Aziz
  • Bertrand Lasternas
  • Chenlu Zhang
  • Vivian Loftness
  • Peter Scupelli
  • Yunjeong Mo
  • Jie Zhao
  • Nana Wilberforce
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8519)


Office workers typically don’t know how much energy they consume at work. Since the workers don’t pay the energy bills, they tend to waste energy. To support energy conservation and motivate workers, the Intelligent Dashboard for Occupants (ID-O) was developed using multiple intervention strategies – eco-feedback (self-monitoring, advice, and comparison), remote controls, and automated controls. The baseline data was collected for fourteen weeks from eighty office workers and ID-Os with different features were deployed for seven weeks. The results show that the group with all the features (eco-feedback, remote controls, automated controls) made the biggest energy savings at 35.4%, the group that had eco-feedback and the remote controls showed 20.2% energy savings, the feedback only group achieved 9% energy savings, and the last group (the control group) produced 3.6% energy savings. The automated control feature produced the biggest energy savings, and was most effective in energy management for lights and phones, but not for computers and monitors.


energy dashboard sustainability workplace behavior change ecofeedback remote and automated control plug load management organization 


  1. 1.
    EIA, U.: Annual energy review. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC (2011),
  2. 2.
    Carrico, A.R., Riemer, M.: Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(1), 1–13 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lucid Design. Elon University Strives to Meet Carbon Commitment Through Behavior Change (July 1, 2010), (retrieved April 14, 2013)
  4. 4.
    Yun, R., Scupelli, P., Aziz, A., Loftness, V.: Sustainability in the Workplace: Nine Intervention Techniques for Behavior Change. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7822, pp. 253–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mercier, C., Moorefield, L.: Commercial office plug load savings and assessment: Final report. Produced by ECOVA and Supported Through the California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research Program (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yun, R., Scupelli, P., Aziz, A., Lasternas, B., Loftness, V., Wilberforce, N.: Investigating Sustainability Stages in the Workplace. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) Proceedings, HCI International 2014. LNCS, vol. 8519, pp. 616–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    NBI, “Managing Your Office Equipment Plug Load” (2012),
  9. 9.
    Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Landay, J.: The design of eco-feedback technology. In: CHI 2010, pp. 1999–2008. ACM, New York (2010), doi:10.1145/1753326.1753629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Granderson, J., Piette, M.A., Ghatikar, G.: Building energy information systems: user case studies. Energy Efficiency 4(1), 17–30 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bartram, L., Rodgers, J., Woodbury, R.: Smart homes or smart occupants? Supporting aware living in the home. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6947, pp. 52–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alrowaily, M.A.: Energy Monitoring through Social Networks (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato) (2012) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Jacucci, G., Tusa, G., Mikkola, T., Zamboni, L., Hoggan, E.: Tailoring Feedback to Users’ Actions in a Persuasive Game for Household Electricity Conservation. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 100–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holmes, T.G.: Eco-visualization: combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. In: C&C 2007, pp. 153–162. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bang, M., Gustafsson, A., Katzeff, C.: Promoting New Patterns in Household Energy Consumption with Pervasive Learning Games. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 55–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shiraishi, M., Washio, Y., Takayama, C., Lehdonvirta, V., Kimura, H., Nakajima, T.: Using individual, social and economic persuasion techniques to reduce CO2 emissions in a family setting. In: Persuasive, pp. 13:1–13:8. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuznetsov, S., Paulos, E.: UpStream: motivating water conservation with low-cost water flow sensing and persuasive displays. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1851–1860. ACM (April 2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, T., Hong, H., Magerko, B.: Designing for persuasion: Toward ambient eco-visualization for awareness. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 106–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lehrer, D., Vasudev, J.: Evaluating a social media application for sustainability in the workplace. In: CHI EA 2011, pp. 2161–2166. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foster, D., Lawson, S., Wardman, J., Blythe, M., Linehan, C.: “Watts in it for me?”: design implications for implementing effective energy interventions in organisations. In: CHI 2012, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2357–2366 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity (December 2002), doi:10.1145/763955.763957Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fischer, C.: Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1(1), 79–104 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fitzpatrick, G., Smith, G.: Technology-Enabled Feedback on Domestic Energy Consumption: Articulating a Set of Design Concerns. Pervasive Computing 8(1), 37–44 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yun, R., Lasternas, B., Aziz, A., Loftness, V., Scupelli, P., Rowe, A., Kothari, R., Marion, F., Zhao, J.: Toward the Design of a Dashboard to Promote Environmentally Sustainable Behavior among Office Workers. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7822, pp. 246–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Yun
    • 1
  • Azizan Aziz
    • 2
  • Bertrand Lasternas
    • 2
  • Chenlu Zhang
    • 2
  • Vivian Loftness
    • 2
  • Peter Scupelli
    • 3
  • Yunjeong Mo
    • 2
  • Jie Zhao
    • 2
  • Nana Wilberforce
    • 4
  1. 1.Computational Design, School of ArchitectureCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUnited States
  2. 2.Building Performance and Diagnostics, School of ArchitectureCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUnited States
  3. 3.School of DesignCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUnited States
  4. 4.Realty Services, PNC BankPittsburghUnited States

Personalised recommendations