The Encourage Operators to Promote Manual Flight Operations- a Pandemic in Modern Aviation
Advances in technology have enabled increasingly sophisticated automation to be introduced into the flight decks of modern airplanes. Generally, this automation was added to accomplish worthy objectives such as reducing flightcrew workload, adding additional capability, or increasing fuel economy. To a large extent, these objectives have been achieved. Safety also stood to benefit from the increasing amounts of highly reliable automation. Indeed, the current generation of highly automated transport category airplanes has generally demonstrated an improved safety record relative to the previous generation of airplanes. Vulnerabilities do exist, though, and further safety improvements should be made. To provide a safety target to guide the aviation industry, the Secretary of Transportation and others have expressed the view that the aviation industry should strive for the objective of none accidents. Training standards and currency in manual flying skills may well have deteriorated, but are these changes in proportion to the tasks and situations typical of modern operations, or really at the root of handling related safety concerns .
KeywordsAutomation Manual procedures Pandemia
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Eugenio, C.: Automação no cockpit das aeronaves: um preciosoauxílio à operação aérea ou um fator de aumento de complexidade no ambiente profissional dos pilotos, 1st edn., vol. 1, pp. 34–35, São Paulo, Brasil (2011)Google Scholar
- 2.Henriqson, E.: A coordenação como um fenômeno cognitivo distribuído e situado em cockpits de aeronaves- Coordination as a distributed cognitive phenomena situated in aircraft cockpits Aviation in Focus (PortoAlegre), Porto Alegre, vol. 1(1), pp. 58–76 (Ago/Dez. 2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990, 2012)Google Scholar
- 5.Sternberg, R.J.: Cognitive psychology. Ed Artmed, Porto Alegre (2000)Google Scholar
- 6.Green, R.G., Frenbard, M.: Human Factors for Pilots. Avebury Technical. Aldershot, England (1993)Google Scholar
- 7.FAA-Federal Aviation Administration, DOT/FAA/AM-10/13, Office of Aerospace Medicine, Causes of General Aviation Google Scholar
- 8.Accidents and Incidents: Analysis Using NASA Aviation, Safety Reporting System Data. Press, Washington, DC (September 2010, 2011, 2012) Google Scholar
- 10.Martins, E.: Study of the implications for health and work in the operationalization and the aeronaut embedded in modern aircraft in the man-machines interactive process complex, Estudo das implicações na saúde e na operacionalização e no trabalho do aeronauta embarcado em modernas aeronaves no processo interativo homemmáquinas complexas, thesis, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Fundação Osw Cruz, pp. 567–612, Perna, Brasil (August 2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Martins, E.: Ergonomics in Aviation: A critical study of the causal responsibility of pilots in accidents. Ergonomia na Aviação: Um estudo crítico da responsabilidade dos pilotos na causalidade dos acidentes, Msc. Monography, Universidade Federal Pernambuco, Brasil, PernambucoGoogle Scholar
- 12.Federal Aviation Administration Human Factors Team Report on: The Interfaces Between Flightcrewsand- Modern Flight Deck Systems (June 18, 1996)Google Scholar