Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
Book cover

International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability

DUXU 2014: Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments pp 173–183Cite as

  1. Home
  2. Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments
  3. Conference paper
Left vs. Right-Handed UX: A Comparative User Study on a Mobile Application with Left and Right-Handed Users

Left vs. Right-Handed UX: A Comparative User Study on a Mobile Application with Left and Right-Handed Users

  • Sinan Aşçı16,17 &
  • Kerem Rızvanoğlu17 
  • Conference paper
  • 6581 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • 4 Altmetric

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 8518)

Abstract

The demand for point-of-sale (PoS) applications, from public service kiosk to personal mobile devices, has drastically increased since the last decade. PoS applications are a demanding environment that requires the interface to be responsive, accurate and easy to use for anyone. Menus and navigation in applications have traditionally been on the left, but many application developers choose to put them on the right so that the content can have focus on the left. In left-to-right languages, people are used to reading from the left, and so objects on the left hand side get more attention than those on the right. Previous research has shown the benefits of right-handed use for touchscreen mobile phones in several angles, such as performance, usability and user experience. The goal of this study is to investigate the differentiating aspects of left or right-handed user experience through the use of a popular mobile PoS application in Turkey, YemekSepeti, on touchscreen mobile phones. More specifically, this study aims to evaluate the left and right-handed user experience on touchscreen mobile phones regarding an application, which was mainly designed to be used with a defined thumb. For this purpose, a qualitative mobile usability test based on a multi-method approach was conducted with a sample of 8 Turkish college students who defined themselves as iPhone users. The tests were conducted with a predefined smart phone: iPhone 4S. The participants were observed during the task executions and any additional data was collected by the thinking-aloud, eye tracking and video-recording of the participants. After completing the tasks, the participants were interviewed to have further understanding on their thoughts and actions. Findings support the notion that the usability of a touchscreen mobile phone was affected by both handedness and the layout of the applications in terms of entry speed, accuracy rate and inclusive touch interfaces.

Keywords

  • User Experience (UX)
  • Handedness
  • Touchscreen
  • Mobile
  • Application

Download conference paper PDF

References

  1. Waloszek, G.: Interaction Design Guide for Touchscreen Applications. SAP Design, Newtown Square (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morris, J.: Android User Interface Development - Beginner’s Guide. Packt Publishing, Birmingham (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. comScore.: Touchscreen Mobile Phone Adoption Grows at Blistering Pace in U.S.During Past Year. comScore, Inc., Reston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Takahashi, D.: Touchscreen market growing 10 times faster than other displays. VentureBeat (2011), http://venturebeat.com/2011/08/17/touchscreen-market-growing-10-times-faster-than-other-displays/ (retrieved January 3, 2014)

  5. Segan, S.: Why I Hate Touchscreens (2009), http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2337575,00.asp (retrieved January 1, 2014)

  6. Weiss, S.: Handheld Usability. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Silfverberg, M., MacKenzie, I.S., Korhonen, P.: Predicting Text Entry Speed on Mobile Phones. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 9–16 (April 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Perry, K.B., Hourcade, J.P.: Evaluating One Handed Thumb Tapping on Mobile Touchscreen Devices. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface, vol. 322, pp. 57–64 (May 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Renner, M., Taylor, E.: Analyzing Qualitative Data. Sheboygan, Wisconsin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shneiderman, B.: Touch screens now offer compelling uses. IEEE Software 8(2), 93–94, 107 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied English and Translation Department, Nişantaşı University Abdiİpekçi, Cad. No: 89 Bayrampaşa, İstanbul, Turkey

    Sinan Aşçı

  2. Media and Communication Studies, Galatasaray University, Faculty of Communication, Ciragan Cad. No: 36Ortakoy, 34357, Istanbul, Turkey

    Sinan Aşçı & Kerem Rızvanoğlu

Authors
  1. Sinan Aşçı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kerem Rızvanoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aaron Marcus and Associates, Inc, Euclid Avenue, Suite 1F, 1196, 94708-1640, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Aaron Marcus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aşçı, S., Rızvanoğlu, K. (2014). Left vs. Right-Handed UX: A Comparative User Study on a Mobile Application with Left and Right-Handed Users. In: Marcus, A. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments. DUXU 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8518. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07626-3_16

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07626-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07625-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07626-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 3.238.134.157

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.