Getting and Keeping Aged People Socially Included

Trials with Real End-Users of the EasyReach System
  • Michele Cornacchia
  • Filomena Papa
  • Enrico Nicolò
  • Bartolomeo Sapio
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 291)


EasyReach is an Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme project aimed at fostering the social interaction of home-bound and less educated elderly people. The project proposed a web interfaced service, accessed through the EasyReach DTT Set Top Box and a special remote control, equipped with interactive multimedia and an inertial unit. Pilots were carried out in the Italian cities of Rome and Milan by engaging real end-users in the controlled development of tasks. In the pilot conducted in Rome and described in this paper, data were collected by using both group and personal interviews, video recording and non-participant observations. Scenario engagement with realistic tasks was properly arranged.

In general, results show that EasyReach turns out to benefit people who stay at home or live alone, especially disabled people and those who are sick. The need to stay in touch is a primary driver for most, if not all, of the questioned elderly people. Retirement from active working life is a turning point in their lives and the feeling of being left at the margins of society often appears with different implications.

EasyReach is accepted as a way of spending the day and meeting friends, as well as to contact people one would not encounter otherwise, to join groups having the same interests and actively participating in social life. Sending messages can help sharing information and interests. Yet elderly people want more, asking to bridge the gap between them and public administrations, pension systems, healthcare, social services, emergency providers and similar.


acceptance adoption aged people ambient assisted living behavioral change digital divide digital environment e-inclusion elderly human computer interaction human factors innovation isolation resistance to change scenario engagement social inclusion supported interaction usage user needs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kaplan, D. (ed.): e-Inclusion: New challenges and policy recommendations. eEurope Advisory Group – WG2 – e-Inclusion: Final Report (July 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hardill, I.: E-Government and Older People in Ireland North and South. CARDI, Research commissioned by Office of First Minister and Deputy First Minister (October 2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Commission, Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2012, Directorate-General for Communication Networks, Content and Technology (June 2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Information Technology Observatory (EITO), Special report on The emergence of Connected TV services market (January 2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quico, C., Geerts, D.: Interactive TV and video: Papers from EuroITV Conference, Introduction by Chairs. International Journal of Digital Television 3(2), 181–185 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arch, A.: Web Accessibility for Older Users: A Literature Review. W3C Working Draft (May 14, 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jung, C., Hahn, V.: GUIDE - Adaptive User Interfaces for Accessible Hybrid TV Applications. In: A Position Paper for the Second W3C Web and TV Workshop, February 8-9 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Guyader, H.L.: Einclusion public policies in Europe. Final report, EC (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rissola, G., Garrido, M.: Survey on eInclusion Actors in the EU27. In: Torrecillas, C., Centeno, C., Misuraca, G. (eds.) EC JRC, Final Draft (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Senior Project, Ethics of e-Inclusion of older people, Discussion paper for the Workshop on Ethics and e-Inclusion, Bled (Slo) (May 12, 2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bisiani, R., et al.: Fostering Social Interaction of Home-Bound Elderly People: The EasyReach System. In: Ali, M., Bosse, T., Hindriks, K.V., Hoogendoorn, M., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7906, pp. 33–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sapio, B., Turk, T., Cornacchia, M., Papa, F., Nicolò, E., Livi, S.: Building scenarios of digital television adoption: a pilot study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22(1), 43–63 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Cornacchia
    • 1
  • Filomena Papa
    • 1
  • Enrico Nicolò
    • 1
  • Bartolomeo Sapio
    • 1
  1. 1.Fondazione Ugo BordoniRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations