Skip to main content

The Need for a Value-Reflexive Governance of Water in the Anthropocene

Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)

Abstract

The paper reflects on the conditions for a value-reflexive governance of water as a tool to contribute to Sustainable Development within the Anthropocene and to deal with the social and political challenges along the way. Its contribution consists in integrating value discourses in sustainable water governance. These value discourses are necessary and unavoidable. While integrating more stakeholders in problem solving and knowledge production leads to more value disputes, it will at the same time strengthen the legitimacy of water governance. A value-reflexive governance aims to make visible the values underlying scientific and political concepts, and to treat value conflicts in an ethically informed and structured way. The paper discusses conceptual considerations and critically assesses the Anthropocene concept and deals with challenges to sustainable water governance. It then argues that the approach of value-reflexive governance might be useful for water governance and shows what questions need to be considered conceptually: What are values? What is the contribution of ethics to a value-reflexive governance of water? What is the relationship between good and value-reflexive governance? As a result a pragmatically concept of values and a more value-reflexive stance to values in governance is suggested.

Keywords

  • Good Governance
  • Global Environmental Change
  • Integrate Water Resource Management
  • Ethical Debate
  • Governance Process

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07548-8_28
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-07548-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Autin W, Holbrook J (2011) Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture? GSA Today 22:60–61. doi:10.1130/G153GW.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Bals C, Hameling S, Windfuhr M (2008) Climate change, food security and the right to adequate food. Study Published by Bread for the World and Germanwatch. Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck R, Meisch S, Potthast T (2012) The value(s) of sustainability within a pragmatically justified theory of values: considerations in the context of climate change. In: Potthast T, Meisch S (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Ethical perspectives on land use and food production. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 49–54

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A (2008) Integrated water resources management: is it working? Water Resour Dev 24:5–22

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen P (2002) The geology of mankind. Nature 415:23

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen P, Schwägerl C (2013) Living in the anthropocene: towards a new global ethos. environment 360. http://e360.yale.edu/feature/living_in_the_anthropocene_toward_a_new_global_ethos/2363/. Accessed 17 Aug 2013

  • Dietrich J (2004) Ethisch-Philosophische Grundlagenkompetenzen: ein Modell für Studierende und Lehrende. In: Maring M (ed) Ethisch-Philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. Ein Studienbuch. LIT, Münster, pp 15–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Düwell M, Hübenthal C, Werner MH (2011) Einleitung. In: Düwell M, Hübenthal C, Werner MH (eds) Handbuch ethik. Metzler, Stuttgart, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 26:568–582

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Groenfeldt D (2013) Water ethics. A values approach to solving the water crisis. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenfeldt D, Schmidt J (2013) Ethics and water governance. Ecol Soc 18. doi:10.5751/ES-04629-180114

  • GWP [= Global Water Partnership] (2010) What is IWRM? http://www.gwp.org/en/The-Challenge/What-is-IWRM/. Accessed 29 Dec 2013

  • Hoppe R, Wesselink A (2011) If post-normal science is the solution, what is the problem? Sci Technol Human Values 36:389–412

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Mejerink S (2007) Understanding and managing water transitions: a policy science perspective. Paper presented to the First International Conference on Adaptive and Integrated Water Management, Basel, Switzerland, 12–15 Nov 2007. http://www.newater.uni-osnabrueck.de/caiwa/data/papers%20session/G1/springer01-Meijerink.pdf. Accessed 8 Sep 2012

  • ICS [= International Commission on Stratigraphy] (2013) Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy, Working Group on the ‘Anthropocene’. http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/workinggroups/anthropocene/. Accessed 29 Dec 2013

  • Immergut E (2011) Democratic theory and policy analysis: four models of “Policy, Politics and Choice”. der moderne staat 1: 69–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram H (2006) Water as a multi-dimensional value: implications for participation and transparency. Int Environ Agreements 6:429–433

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram H (2011) Beyond universal remedies for good water governance: a political and contextual approach. In: Garrido A, Ingram H (eds) Water for food in a changing world. Routledge, London, pp 241–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas H (2001) The genesis of values. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas H (2008) Value generalization. Limitations and possibilities of a communication about values. J Bus Econ Ethics 9:88–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser M, Millar K, Thorstensen E et al (2007) Developing the ethical matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. J Agric Environ Ethics 20:65–80

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarsch M (2011) Ethical targets and questions of water management. In: Kowarsch M (ed) Water management options in a globalised world. Proceedings of an international scientific workshop (20–23 June 2011, Bad Schönbrunn), p 38–49. http://www.hfph.de/igp/proceedings2011. Accessed 29 Dec 2013

  • Lövbrand E, Stripple J, Wiman B (2009) Earth system governmentality. Reflections on science in the anthropocene. Glob Environ Change 19:7–13

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Meisch S (2013) Green food consumption: whose responsibility? In: Röcklinsberg H, Sandin P (eds) The ethics of consumption. The citizen, the market and the law. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 160–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisch S, Potthast T (2011) Towards a pragmatically justified theory of values for governance. Conceptual analysis of values, norms, preferences and attitudes. EU-Project Value Isobars. Work package 1 Deliverable 2 (Mar 2011). http://www.value-isobars.no/filestore/WP1_2_Conceptualanalysisofvaluesnormspreferencesandattitudes.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2013

  • Meisch S, Beck R, Potthast T (2012) Towards a value-reflexive governance of water. In: Potthast T, Meisch S (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Ethical perspectives on land use and food production. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 413–418

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:15181–15187

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2008) Sustainable development of common-pool resources. http://www.indiana.edu/~workshop/colloquia/materials/papers/ostrom_paper1.pdf. Accessed 9 Sep 2012

  • Ostrom E (2010) A multi-scale approach to coping with climate change and other collective action problems. Solutions 1:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott K, Baatz C (2012) Domains of climate ethics: an overview. In: Potthast T, Meisch S (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Ethical perspectives on land use and food production. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 23–28

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Toonen T (2009a) Sustainable water governance in times of global change. A major challenge for the scientific and policy communities. IHDP Update Issue 3:26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Toonen T (2009b) Global water governance: Quo Vadis? Global Water News 8:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J et al (2007) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Potthast T (2000) Bioethics and epistemic-moral hybrids: Perspectives from the history of science. Biomedical Ethics 5:20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Potthast T (2010) Epistemisch-moralische Hybride und das Problem interdisziplinärer Urteilsbildung. In: Jungert M, Romfeld E, Sukopp T et al (eds) Interdisziplinarität. Theorie, Praxis, Probleme. WBG, Darmstadt, pp 173–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricken F (2003) Allgemeine ethik. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Röckström J, Steffen W, Noone K et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 46:472–475

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schnädelbach H (1983) Philosophie in Deutschland 1831–1933. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J (2010) Water ethics and water management. In: Brown P, Schmidt J (eds) Water ethics. Foundational readings for students and professionals. Island Press, Washington, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Kuylenstierna J (2009) Climate change, energy and food security, economic development—in the end, it all trickles down to water. Climate change policy and practice. http://climate-l.iisd.org/guest-articles/climate-change-energy-and-food-security-economic-development-in-the-end-it-all-trickles-down-to-water/. Accessed 9 Sep 2012

  • Voget-Kleschin L (2013) Employing the capability approach in conceptualizing sustainable development. J Hum Dev Capabilities 14:483–502

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Steffen W et al (2010) The new world of the anthropocene. Environ Sci Technol 44:2228–2231

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Haywood A et al (2011) The anthropocene: a new epoch of geological time? Phil Trans R Soc 369:835–841

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler R, Ott K (2011) The quality of sustainability science: a philosophical perspective. Sustain Sci Practice Policy 7:31–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper builds on previous work and results of the EU project “Value Isobars—The Landscape and Isobars of European Values in Relation to Science and New Technology” (FP7 31004480; http://www.value-isobars.eu/). I acknowledge the provision of important discussion points from project partners and especially thank Thomas Potthast, Matthias Kaiser and Helen Ingram. The full responsibility for the content, style, errors and inaccuracies is mine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Meisch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meisch, S. (2014). The Need for a Value-Reflexive Governance of Water in the Anthropocene. In: Bhaduri, A., Bogardi, J., Leentvaar, J., Marx, S. (eds) The Global Water System in the Anthropocene. Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07548-8_28

Download citation