Skip to main content
View expanded cover

The Global Water System in the Anthropocene pp 271–287Cite as

Water Governance and Management Systems and the Role of Ecosystem Services: Case Study Insights—Groundwater Management in the Sandveld Region, South Africa

  • 1434 Accesses

Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)

Abstract

Freshwater resources deliver a broad set of ecosystem services essential for human health and well-being, food and energy production, social and economic stability, and for protecting and maintaining ecosystems. The ever increasing demand of water resources often result in substantial declines in the provision of ecosystem services. The management of human and environmental water needs is therefore challenging and calls for an integrative view on ecosystem services. A shift of current water management objectives is required to ensure water security for current and future generations. This article analyzes water governance and management systems (WGMS) and highlights characteristics assumed to be crucial for adaptive and integrated management: (i) institutional settings, (ii) actor networks, and (iii) multi-level structures. To understand complex WGMS one has to link these characteristics to management performances including impacts on ecosystem services. We applied this approach to the Sandveld in South Africa focusing on actor networks and the management of ecosystem services. We indicate that a basic re-thinking of water management objectives at national and regional level according to groundwater sustainability took place. A bottom-up movement in the Sandveld developed approaches to protect and sustain groundwater resources. Nevertheless, cooperation between actors and sectors from different levels is weak which in turn provides a huge barrier for the integration of ecosystem services into groundwater policies.

Keywords

  • Ecosystem Service
  • Potato Production
  • Administrative Level
  • Water Governance
  • Societal Context

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07548-8_18
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-07548-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 18.1
Fig. 18.2
Fig. 18.3
Fig. 18.4

Notes

  1. 1.

    A distinction is made by Pahl-Wostl (2009) between resources management and governance. ‘Resources management’ refers to the activities of analyzing and monitoring, developing and implementing measures to keep the state of a resource within desirable bounds. The notion of ‘resource governance’ takes into account the different actors and networks that help formulate and implement environmental policy and/or policy instruments. Governance sets the rules under which management operates.

  2. 2.

    Coordinating twinning partnerships towards more adaptive governance in river basins supported by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme (2009–2011).

References

  • Bakker K, Kooy M, Shofiania NE, Martijn EJ (2008) Governance failure: rethinking the institutional dimensions of urban water supply to poor households. World Dev 36(10):1891–1915

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1–11

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK, Tortajada C (2010) Future water governance: problems and perspectives. Water Resour Dev 26(2):129–139

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Braune E (2000) Towards comprehensive groundwater resource management in South Africa. IAH Congress 2000, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Braune E, Xu Y (2008) Groundwater management issues in southern Africa—an IWRM perspective. Water SA 34(6):699–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad J, Nel J, Wentzel J (2005) The challenges and implications of assessing groundwater recharge: A case study—northern Sandveld, Western Cape, South Africa. Water SA 30(5):75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services—societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Wilson MA et al (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) South Africa (2005) Olifants/Doorn water management area: Internal Strategic Perspective. Prepared by Ninham Shand (Pty) Ltd in association with Jakoet and Associates, Umvoto Africa, FST and Tlou and Matji, on behalf of the Directorate: National Water Resource Planning. DWAF Report No P WMA 17/000/00/0305

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Franke AC, Steyn JM, Ranger KS, Haverkort AJ (2011) Developing environmental principles, criteria, indicators and norms for potato production in South Africa through field surveys and modeling. Agric Syst 104(4):297–306

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10(2):328–337

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Grin J (2010) Climate change adaptation in European river basins. Reg Environ Change 10(4):263–284

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin F, Ranganathan J (2008) Action agenda for sustaining ecosystem services. In: Ranganathan J, Munasinghe M, Irwin F (eds) Policies for sustainable governance of global ecosystem services. Washington, pp 21–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Knieper C, Kastens B, Holtz G, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Analysing water governance in heterogeneous case studies—experiences with a database approach. Environ Sci Policy 13(7):592–603

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Knüppe K, Pahl-Wostl C (2011) Requirements for adaptive governance of groundwater ecosys-tem services—Insights from Sandveld (South Africa), Upper Guadiana (Spain) and Spree (Germany). Reg Environ Change 13(1):53–66

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krysanova V, Dickens C, Timmerman J, Varela-Ortega C et al (2010) Cross-comparison of cli-mate change adaptation strategies across large river basins in Europe, Africa and Asia. Water Resour Manage 24(14):4121–4160

    Google Scholar 

  • Loring AP, Chapin FS, Gerlach SC (2008) The services-oriented architecture: ecosystem services as a framework for diagnosing change in social ecological systems. Ecosystems 11(3):478–489

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MA [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment] (2005) Introduction and conceptual framework. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch Z, Conrad C (2007) Remote sensing and GIS based determination of groundwater dependent ecosystems in the Western Cape, South Africa. Hydrogeol J 15(1):19–28

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: emery and environmental decision making. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond Panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15181–15187

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19(3):354–365

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P, Aerts J, Berkamp G, Cross K (2007) Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecol Soc 12(2):30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art30/

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Holtz G, Kastens B, Knieper C (2010) Analysing complex water governance regimes: the management and transition framework. Environ Sci Policy 13(7):571–581

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Lebel L, Knieper C, Nikitina E (2012) From applying panaceas to amstering complexity: towards adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ Sci Policy 23:24–34

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem services bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. PNAS USA 107(11):5242–5247

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P, Hall AW (2003) Effective water governance. TEC Background Paper, Stockholm, Global Water Partnership

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Beard TD, Bennett EM et al. (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11(1):28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/

  • Schlüter M, Leslie H, Levin S (2009) Managing water-use trade-offs in a semi-arid river delta to sustain multiple ecosystem services: a modeling approach. Ecol Res 24(3):491–503

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP [United Nations Environment Programme] (2007) Global environment outlook: environment for development (GEO 4). Progress Press, Valletta

    Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld AS, Biggs R, Scholes RJ et al (2005) Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philos Trans Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 360:425–441

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany

    Kathrin Knüppe & Claudia Pahl-Wostl

Authors
  1. Kathrin Knüppe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia Pahl-Wostl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathrin Knüppe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Global Water System Project, Bonn, Germany

    Anik Bhaduri

  2. Global Water System Project, Bonn, Germany

    Janos Bogardi

  3. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands

    Jan Leentvaar

  4. Global Water System Project, Bonn, Germany

    Sina Marx

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knüppe, K., Pahl-Wostl, C. (2014). Water Governance and Management Systems and the Role of Ecosystem Services: Case Study Insights—Groundwater Management in the Sandveld Region, South Africa. In: Bhaduri, A., Bogardi, J., Leentvaar, J., Marx, S. (eds) The Global Water System in the Anthropocene. Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07548-8_18

Download citation