Advertisement

Walking Speed in VR Maze while Central Visual Fields Are Restricted with Synchronously Moving Black Circles

Functions of Central Visual Field in Walking through VR Space
  • Yohsuke Yoshioka
  • Colin Ellard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8532)

Abstract

We examined the function of the central visual field by using the newly developed VR system that was consisted with a wide-view HMD and an eye-tracker for restricting an arbitrary area of human visual field. Subjects were asked to walk through short virtual mazes under different visual condition in which 10 or 20 degree of their central visual field was restricted artificially with the system. Results indicated 1) Times for walking through the entire maze under the visual condition with 10 degrees of the central visual field restricted in synchronization were longer than times under the condition in which 10 degrees of the fixed central area of screen were restricted. 2) For walking through the area with two dead ends, walking times under the condition in which 20 degrees of the central visual field were restricted were longer than under the condition in which 10 degrees of the central visual field were restricted.

Keywords

Applied cognitive psychology Cognitive task analysis Human Centered Design to reduce through life costs Human Factors / System Integration Human Factors certification and regulation Safety Simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anstis, S.M.: A chart demonstrarin variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research 14, 589–592 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, B.: Resolution thresholds for moving target at the fovea and in the peripheral retina. Vision Research 12, 293–304 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Committee on Colorimetry, Optical Society of America (1963)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dolezal, H.: Living in a world transformed: perceptual and performatory adaptation to visual distortion. Academic Press Proceedings Series 26, 161–184 (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ikeda, M., Saida, S.: Span of recognition in reading. Vision Research 18(10), 83–88 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ikeda, M., Takeuchi, T.: Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psycholophysis 18, 255–260 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johansson, G.: “Visual Perception of locomotion elicited and controlled by a bright spot moving in the periphery of the visual field” Report #210 Department of Psychology Uppsala University (1977)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Toto, L.: Eye movements and the detection of lung tumors in chest images. In: Gale, A.G., Johnson, F. (eds.) Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, pp. 297–304. Elsevier Science, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuroiwa, M., Okazaki, S., Yoshioka, Y.: Comparison of visual behaviors within a normal visual field and a restricted visual field: navigating a corridor and staircase. The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics 37(1), 29–40 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Livingstone, M., Hubel, D.: Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 240, 740–749 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Low, F.N.: The peripheral visual acuity of 100 subjects. American Journal of Psychology 146, 573–584 (1946)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mateef, S., Gourevich, A.: Peripheral vision and perceived visual direction. Biological Cybernetics 49, 111–118 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McConkie, G., Zola, D., Wolverton, G.: Time course of visual information utilization during fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 10, 75–89 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maunsell, J.H.R., Newsome, W.T.: Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 10, 363–401 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osaka, N.: Peripheral lower visual field: a neglected factor? Behav. & Brain Sciences 13, 555 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paap, K.R., Newsome, S.L., McDonald, J.E., Schvaneveldt, R.W.: “An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition” The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review 89, 573–594 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Polyak, S.L.: The retina. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1941)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Previc, F.: Functional Specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav. & Brain Sciences 13, 519–575 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saida, S., Ikeda, M.: Useful Visual Field Size for Pattern Perception. Perception & Psychophysics 25(2), 119–125 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skrandies, W.: Human contrast sensitivity: Regional retinal differences. Human Neurobiology 4, 97–99 (1985)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ungerleider, L.G., Minshkin, M.: Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle, D.J., Goodale, M.A. (eds.) Analysis of Visual Behavior. MIT Press (1982)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Warren, R.: The perception of ego motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 2, 448–456 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wertheim, T.: Über die indirekte Sehschärfe. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (Leipzig) 7, 172–187 (1894)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Woodhouse, J.M., Barlow, H.B.: Spatial and temporal resolution and analysis. In: Barlow, H.B., Mollon, D.J. (eds.) The Senses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yohsuke Yoshioka
    • 1
  • Colin Ellard
    • 2
  1. 1.Chiba UniversityChibaJapan
  2. 2.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations