Evaluating the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure: Cloud4all Evaluation Framework

  • Eleni Chalkia
  • Juan Bautista Montalva Colomer
  • Silvia de los Rios Perez
  • Ivan Carmona Rojo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8516)

Abstract

Moving rapidly into digital economy expands the need for accessibility coming from the growing number of people with disabilities, in various contexts. Additionally, ubiquitous computing has amplified the need for interactive systems to be able to adapt to their context of use, enhancing their utility while preserving usability. Cloud4all project [0] aims to develop a complete new paradigm in accessibility, by replacing adaptation of individual products and services, with auto-configuration of any mainstream product or service, using cloud technologies to activate and augment any natural accessibility the product or service has, based upon a set of the user’s Needs & Preferences (N&Ps). In order to assess this goal, Cloud4all has developed an evaluation framework, as part of the User Centred Design (UCD) iterative process. This paper provides an overview of the 1st pilots’ evaluation framework, together with ideas and plans about the general framework of the pilot test.

Keywords

Accessibility evaluation framework auto-configuration scenario usability user experience Cloud4all 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cloud4all project, CN. 289016, 7th Framework Programme, ICT-2011.5.5 ICT for smart and personalised inclusion (November 2011), http://cloud4all.info/
  2. 2.
    Consolvo, S., Arnstein, L., Franza, B.R.: User Study Techniques in the Design and Evaluation of a Ubicomp Environment. In: Borriello, G., Holmquist, L.E. (eds.) UbiComp 2002. LNCS, vol. 2498, pp. 73–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belotti, F., Berta, R., DeGloria, A., Margarone, M.: User Testing a Hypermedia Tour Guide. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 33–41 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Standards Organization. ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic equirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva: International Standards Organization (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gould, J.D., Lewis, C.: Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM 28(3), 300–311 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shackel, B.: Human factors and usability. In: Preece, J., Keller, L. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: Selected Readings. Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shackel, B.: Usability – context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In: Shackel, B., Richardson, S. (eds.) Human Factors for Informatics Usability, pp. 21–37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J.: Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley, London (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., Minocha, S.: User interface design and evaluation. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bevan, N.: Quality in use for all. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) User Interfaces for All: Methods, Concepts and Tools, pp. 353–368. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norman, D.A.: The invisible computer. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassenzahl, M., Tractinksy, N.: User experience: a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology 25(2), 91–97 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassenzahl, M.: Hedonic, emotional and experiental perspective on product quality. In: Ghaoui, C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, pp. 266–272. Idea Group (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität (AttrakDiff: A questionnaire for the measurement of perceived hedonic and pragmatic quality). In: Ziegler, J., Szwillus, G. (eds.) Mensch and Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, pp. 187–196. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hassenzahl, M., Law, E.L.-C., Hvannberg, E.T.: User experience: towards a unified view. In: Law, E.L.-C., Hvannberg, E.T., Hassenzahl, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd COST294-MAUSE International Open Workshop (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001b)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rubin, J., Chisnell, D.: Handbook of Usability Testing: Howto Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. Wiley (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    GPII, Global Public Infrastructure, http://gpii.net/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleni Chalkia
    • 1
  • Juan Bautista Montalva Colomer
    • 2
  • Silvia de los Rios Perez
    • 2
  • Ivan Carmona Rojo
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre of Research and Technology Hellas/Hellenic Institute of Transport (CERTH/HIT)ThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)MadridSpain
  3. 3.Technosite - Fundación ONCEMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations