Inspection of Penstocks and Featureless Tunnel-like Environments Using Micro UAVs

Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 105)


Micro UAVs are receiving a great deal of attention in many diverse applications. In this paper, we are interested in a unique application, surveillance for maintenance of large infrastructure assets such as dams and penstocks, where the goal is to periodically inspect and map the structure to detect features that might indicate the potential for failures. Availability of architecture drawings of these constructions makes the mapping problem easier. However large buildings with featureless geometries pose a significant problem since it is difficult to design a robust localization algorithm for inspection operations. In this paper we show how a small quadrotor equipped with minimal sensors can be used for inspection of tunnel-like environments such as seen in dam penstocks. Penstocks in particular lack features and do not provide adequate structure for robot localization, especially along the tunnel axis. We develop a Rao-Blackwellized particle filter based localization algorithm which uses a derivative of the ICP for integrating laser measurements and IMU for short-to-medium range pose estimation. To our knowledge, this is the only study in the literature focusing on localization and autonomous control of a UAV in 3-D, featureless tunnel-like environments. We show the success of our work with results from real experiments.


Mobile Robot Unscented Kalman Filter Junction Region Robot Localization Tunnel Axis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ascending Technologies GmbHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hokuyo Automatic Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agrawal, M., Konolige, K.: Real-time localization in outdoor environments using stereo vision and inexpensive GPS. In: 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2006, vol. 3, pp. 1063–1068 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burgard, W., Derr, A., Fox, D., Cremers, A.B.: Integrating global position estimation and position tracking for mobile robots: the dynamic Markov localization approach. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 730–735 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burgard, W., Cremers, A.B., Fox, D., Hähnel, D., Lakemeyer, G., Schulz, D., Steiner, W., Thrun, S.: Experiences with an interactive museum tour-guide robot. Artificial Intelligence 114(1-2), 3–55 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Censi, A.: An accurate closed-form estimate of ICP’s covariance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Rome, Italy, pp. 3167–3172 (April 2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dellaert, F., Fox, D., Burgard, W., Thrun, S.: Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 1322–1328 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., Murphy, K.P., Russell, S.J.: Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering for dynamic bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 176–183 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Durrant-Whyte, H., Bailey, T.: Simultaneous localization and mapping: part i. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine 13(2), 99–110 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM 24(6), 381–395 (1981)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fitzgibbon, A., Pilu, M., Fisher, R.B.: Direct least square fitting of ellipses. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 21(5), 476–480 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grisetti, G., Stachniss, C., Burgard, W.: Improved techniques for grid mapping with Rao-Blackwellized particle filters. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23(1), 34–46 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grzonka, S., Grisetti, G., Burgard, W.: Towards a navigation system for autonomous indoor flying. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2009, pp. 2878–2883 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hansen, P., Corke, P., Boles, W.: Wide-angle visual feature matching for outdoor localization. Int. J. Rob. Res. 29(2-3), 267–297 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hentschel, M., Wulf, O., Wagner, B.: A GPS and laser-based localization for urban and non-urban outdoor environments. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2008, pp. 149–154 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, T., Carlberg, M., Chen, G., Chen, J., Kua, J., Zakhor, A.: Indoor localization and visualization using a human-operated backpack system. In: 2010 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), pp. 1–10 (September 2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahony, R., Kumar, V., Corke, P.: Multirotor aerial vehicles: Modeling, estimation, and control of quadrotor. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine PP(99), 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michael, N., Mellinger, D., Lindsey, Q., Kumar, V.: The GRASP multiple micro-uav testbed. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine 17(3), 56–65 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Se, S., Lowe, D.G., Little, J.J.: Vision-based global localization and mapping for mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21(3), 364–375 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thrun, S., Burgard, W., Fox, D.: Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thrun, S., Fox, D., Burgard, W., Dellaert, F.: Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots. Artificial Intelligence 128(1-2), 99–141 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations