Advertisement

An Approach to Holistic Development of Serious Games and Learning Simulations

  • Aleshia T. Hayes
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8524)

Abstract

This discourse is an argument for a holistic approach to developing learning games and computer mediated experiences through the intersections of the areas of efficacy, effectiveness, and user experience in designing and developing serious games and simulated learning experiences. Some examples are explored in which reasonably effective design approaches could have been improved by a more holistic and iterative approach. The approach includes the integration of learning objectives, outcomes, usability, motivation, experience, ludus, aesthetics, cost and sustainability of the systems based on research within the fields of education, learning theory, game design theory, and simulation. These constructs explain the need for an iterative and holistic approach to designing and developing learning games. Embracing iterative and learning centered design of serious games will perpetuate development of effective educational technology.

Keywords

Educational Technology Efficacy Engagement Serious Games Evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alkin, M.C.: Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z. Guilford Publications (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asundi, K., Lenker, J.A., Nasarwanji, M., Paquet, V., Feathers, D.: A tool for rapid assessment of product usability and universal design: Development and preliminary psychometric testing. Work 39(2), 141–150 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailenson, J.: The Effects of Fully Immersive Virtual Reality on the Learning of Physical Tasks. Paper Presented at The 9th International Workshop on Presence Cleveland, Ohio (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Botella, C., Bretón-López, J., Quero, S., Baños, R., García-Palacios, A.: Treating cockroach phobia with augmented reality. Behavior Therapy 41(3), 401–413 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: the psychology of optimal experience / Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1st Harper Perennial Modern Classics ed.). Harper Perennial, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dede, C.: Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning. Science 323(5910), 66–69 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J.O.: The systematic design of instruction. Merrill/Pearson, Upper Saddle River, N.J (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dieterle, E.: Neomillennial Learning Styles and River City. Children, Youth and Environments 19(1), 245–278 (2009), http://www.colorado.edu/journals/cye (retrieved (date))
  9. 9.
    DOE (Department of Education). National educational technology plan. Transforming American education: learning powered by technology (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Education Nation (Producer). Will Technology Transform Learning? (2012), http://www.educationnation.com/index.cfm?objectid=17C1CAAD-FE84-11E1-9448000C296BA163 (retrieved)
  11. 11.
    Flay, B.: Standards of Evidence (2004), http://www.preventionresearch.org/StandardsofEvidencebook.pdf (retrieved)
  12. 12.
    Frokjaer, E., Hertzum, M., Hornbaek, K.: Measuring Usability: Are Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Satisfaction Really Correlated? (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harteveld, C.: Triadic Game Design Balancing Reality, Meaning and Play (2011), http://site.ebrary.com/id/10452578
  14. 14.
    Hogue, J.R., Brickman, N.S., Pelz, C.A., Markham, S.: Virtual Reality Parachute Simulation Enhancements for Improved Aircrew Emergency Training (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hornbaek, K.: Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods (English). Behaviour & Information Technology (Print) 29(1), 97–111 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Merriam Webster. Holistic. from Encyclopedia Brittanica (2012), http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/holistic
  17. 17.
    Mitgutsch, K., Alvarado, N.: Purposeful by design?: A serious game design assessment framework. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Raleigh, North Carolina, http://gambit.mit.edu/readme/academic_papers/fdg2012_submission_82-1.pdf
  18. 18.
    Robin, H., Marc, L., Robert, Z.: MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research (2004), doi:citeulike-article-id:382810Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skinner, E.A., Kindermann, T.A., Furrer, C.: A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomas, R.G., William John, N., Delieu, J.M.: Augmented Reality for Anatomical Education. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine 33(1), 6–15 (2010), doi:10.3109/17453050903557359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tullis, T., Albert, B.: Chapter 10 - Case Studies Measuring the User Experience, pp. 237–287. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2008a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tullis, T., Albert, B.: Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam, Boston (2008b)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Villalta, M., Gajardo, I., Nussbaum, M., Andreu, J.J., Echeverria, A., Plass, J.L.: Design Guidelines for Classroom Multiplayer Presential Games (CMPG). Computers & Education 57(3), 2039–2053 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleshia T. Hayes
    • 1
  1. 1.Synthetic Reality LabUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations