Online Collaboration: Individual Involvement Used to Predict Team Performance

  • Walkyria Goode
  • Guido Caicedo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8524)


Social media – with its collaborative and interactive functionalities – is an ideal platform for collaboration. Several teams were asked to create material using a content management system. Log records were analyzed to measure group and individual participation. Direct and indirect measures of involvement are used as predictor variables. A model is proposed that uses system-tracked data to forecast team performance.


collaboration collaborative computing team performance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Psychological Association, Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crowne, D.P., Marlowe, D.: A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology 38, 349–354 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duffy, T.M., Cunningham, D.J.: Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In: Jonassen, D. (ed.) Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 170–198. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edmondson, A.: Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2), 350–383 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feldman Barr, T., Dixon, A.L.: Exploring the “Lone Wolf” phenomenon in student teams. Journal of Marketing Education 27(1), 81–90 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katzenbach, J.R., Smith, D.K.: The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-performance Organization. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pfaff, E., Huddleston, P.: Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education 25(1), 37–45 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salomon, G., Globerson, T.: When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research 13(1), 89–100 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shneiderman, B.: Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 1, 92–99 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tarricone, P., Luca, J.: Successful teamwork: A case study. In: HERDSA 2002, pp. 640–646 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W.H., Segers, M., Kirschner, P.A.: Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research 37(5), 490–521 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wageman, R.: Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 145–180 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walkyria Goode
    • 1
  • Guido Caicedo
    • 1
  1. 1.ESPAE-ESPOLGuayaquilEcuador

Personalised recommendations