Advertisement

European Citizens and Their Trust in Social Networks

  • Gianmarco Baldini
  • Ioannis Kounelis
  • Jan Löschner
  • Mariachiara Tallacchini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8524)

Abstract

In information and communication technology (ICT) trust has been considered as a crucial component of digital interactions. Trust has been dissected in a variety of potential meanings and dimensions and through the merging of trust in humans and trust in machines. In this paper, we investigate the role and the aggregation of trust in social networks and blogs and how it relates to knowledge production, and its connections to concepts such as reputation and sustainability in the European context. Moreover, we discuss knowledge production in information and communication technology and its relationship to user trust. We develop a view on the co-production of knowledge and trust and propose a policy management framework to support the users in their trusted use of social networks and blogs. This is presented based on an e-health use case analysis considering web based reputation and developing a new reputation scheme.

Keywords

trust social networks European citizens collaboration reputation e-health 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibbons, M., et al.: The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M.: Rethinking science: knowledge in an age of uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ion, M., Danzi, A., Koshutanski, H., Telesca, L.: A peer-to-peer multidimensional trust model for digital ecosystems. In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, pp. 461–469 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benkler, Y., Nissenbaum, H.: Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14(4), 394–419 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benkler, Y.: The Penguin and the Leviathan. Random House, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jin-Hee, C., Chan, K.S.: Building Trust-Based Sustainable Networks. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 32(2), 32–38 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Commission: Digital Agenda for Europe. COM, 245 (2010), http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/ (accessed December 17, 2013)
  8. 8.
    European Parliament and Council: Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal L 281/31 (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The White House: National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (2011), http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/NSTICstrategy_041511.pdf (accessed January 15, 2014)
  10. 10.
    European Parliament and Council: Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market. COM/2012/0238 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Parliament: European Parliament resolution of 15 December 2010 on the impact of advertising on consumer behavior. Official Journal of the European Union, C 169 E/58 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Truste, http://www.truste.com (accessed February 7, 2014)
  13. 13.
    Yan, S.: Security of Online Reputation Systems: The evolution of attacks and defenses. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (29), 87–97 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, Y., Feng, Q., Sun, Y.: Dai.Y.: Reputation trap: An powerful attack on reputation system of file sharing p2p environment. In: 4th Int. Conf. Security and Privacy in Communication Networks (SecureComm 2008), Istanbul, Turkey (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ball, M.: 23andme’s First Patent (2012), http://madprime.org/articles/2012/05/23andmes-first-patent (accessed January 30, 2014)
  16. 16.
    Jasanoff, S.: States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. Routledge, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merton, R.K.: Science and Democratic Social Structure. In: Social Theory and Social Structure, pp. 604–615. Free Press, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tallacchini, M.: Between uncertainty and responsibility: precaution and the complex journey toward reflexive innovation. In: Vos, E., van Asselt, M., Everson, M. (eds.) Trade, Health and the Environment: The European Union Put to the Test, pp. 74–88. Routledge, London (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wynne, B., et al.: Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. European Commission, EUR 22700 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trusted Shops, http://www.trustedshops.eu/ (accessed February 7, 2014)
  21. 21.
    Facebook, VfG Versandapotheke Österreich, https://www.facebook.com/VfG.Apotheke.at (accessed February 5, 2014)
  22. 22.
    Healthline, http://www.healthline.com/health/about-healthline (accessed January 15, 2014)
  23. 23.
    Neisse, R., Doerr, J.: Model-based Specification and Refinement of Usage Control Policies. In: Eleventh International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), Tarragona, Spain (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Funtowicz, S., Strand, R.: Models of Science and Policy. In: Traavik, T., Lim, L.C. (eds.) Biosafety First: Holistic Approaches to Risk and Uncertainty in Genetic Engineering and Genetically Modified Organisms, pp. 263–278 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianmarco Baldini
    • 1
  • Ioannis Kounelis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jan Löschner
    • 1
  • Mariachiara Tallacchini
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint Research Centre (JRC), European CommissionInstitute for the Protection and Security of the CitizenIspraItaly
  2. 2.Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations