The Role of Educational Technologist in Implementing New Technologies at School

  • Birgy Lorenz
  • Kaido Kikkas
  • Mart Laanpere
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8524)


In 2005, a new profession called “educational technologist” was introduced in Estonian schools. At first, the idea was confusing for many school principals, because of the seeming overlap with the job descriptions of existing ICT support specialists or ICT managers. Other principals interpreted the role of the educational technologist as a technology-savvy teacher who could take responsibility for teaching with technology in some subject domains so that the rest of teachers would not have to bother them with constantly changing landscape of technology. According to the data from the Tiger Leap Foundation (2012), almost 7% of Estonian schools had hired an educational technologist by 2012 – in most of the cases by re-allocating the salary fund of IT support specialists. The position is usually funded by local municipalities, not from the state budget. This paper is reflecting upon the case study data collected from 13 Estonian schools where educational technologists had been employed, the focus group interviews were conducted with 29 persons working in the field of educational technology. The study gives an overview of the current situation by defining the emerging profession of educational technologist on the level of professional practice. We also describe the arguments for establishing such a new position in school and the main challenges of a new specialist starting his/her career in this dynamic field.


educational technologist roles implementing new technologies learning environments assessing teachers training methods and principles mixed expectations 


  1. 1.
    Bean, J.C.: Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. Jossey-Bass (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davidson, J.: A new role in facilitating school reform: The case of the educational technologist. The Teachers College Record 105(5), 729–752 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Doucek, P., Maryska, M., Novotny, O.: Requirements on the competence of ICT managers and their coverage by the educational system–experience in the Czech Republic. Journal of Business Economics and Management (ahead-of-print), 1–24 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duffy, T.M., Raymer, P.L.: A Practical Guide and a Constructivist Rationale for Inquiry Based Learning. Educational Technology 50(4), 3–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter (1967)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eesti infoühiskonna arengukava 2013, Majandus- ja kommunikastiooniministeerium, eelnõu (2006), (retrieved)
  7. 7.
    Eesti infoühiskonna arengukava 2020 koostamise ettepanek, Infoühiskonna arendamisest Eestis (2012), (retrieved)
  8. 8.
    Freedom in the net: Estonia, Freedomhouse (2012), (retrieved)
  9. 9.
    Fullan, M.: The new meaning of educational change. Routledge (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodyear, P., Retalis, S.: Technology-enhanced learning. Sense Publishers (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes, J.: The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 277–302 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lawless, C., Kirkwood, A.: Training the educational technologist. British Journal of Educational Technology 7(1), 54–60 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levy, S., Yupangco, J.: Overcoming the Challenges of Social Learning in the Workplace, LEarning Solutions Magazine (2008), (retrieved)
  14. 14.
    McMahon, F., et al.: Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom, Fraser Institute (2013), (retrieved)
  15. 15.
    Maadvere, I.: Üldhariduskooli haridustehnoloogi ametijuhend (2010), (retrieved )
  16. 16.
    Maadvere, I. IKT uues riiklikus õppekavas, Tallinna Haridusamet (2010),
  17. 17.
    Marandi, T., et al.: IKT ja Eesti koolikultuur, Tiigrihüppe SA ) (2003), (retrieved)
  18. 18.
    McNutt, L.: Tension, Frustration and Compromise in the Field, An Exploratory Study of the Habitus of Educational Technologists (Doctoral dissertation, National University of Ireland Maynooth) (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mets, U.: IT tervikpilt, IT arendusprojektid, haridustehnoloogia juhtimine materjalid. BCS Koolitus (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Niemi, H., Kynäslahti, H., Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S.: Towards ICT in everyday life in Finnish schools: seeking conditions for good practices. Learning, Media and Technology 38(1), 57–71 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peters, K.: M-Learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future. Mobile Learning 113 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Survey of Schools: ICT in Education: ICT in Education. Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe’s Schools, European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology, SMART-Nr 2010/0039 (2013), (retrieved)
  24. 24.
    Tipp, V.: Kes on haridustehnoloog (2010), (retrieved)
  25. 25.
    Vaughn, S., Bos, C.S., Schumm, J.S.: Teaching students who are exceptional, diverse, and at risk in the general education classroom. Pearson (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birgy Lorenz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kaido Kikkas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mart Laanpere
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of InformaticsTallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.Estonian Information Technology CollegeTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations