Examining an Online Collaboration Learning Environment with the Dual Eye-Tracking Paradigm: The Case of Virtual Math Teams

  • Selin Deniz Uzunosmanoğlu
  • Murat Perit Çakir
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8523)


The aim of this study is to investigate the computer supported collaborative problem solving processes using the dual eye-tracking method. 18 university students participated in this study, and 9 pairs tried to solve 10 geometry problems using Virtual Math Team (VMT) online environment. Which situations the participants’ eye movements, and eye gazes overlap, and how usability of VMT environment affect the problem solving processes are tried to identify. After experiments with two eye-trackers, a questionnaire including System Usability Scale and open-ended questions was filled by participants. Eye-tracker data were analyzed both quantitatively using cross-recurrence analysis, and qualitatively using interaction analysis. Analysis of eye-tracker data and open-ended questions are consistent, and support to each other. Results show that pairs collaborating with higher level have more gazes overlapping, more shared understanding, and anticipatory gazes than pairs having with low level. Also, usability of the system and awareness tools affect the collaboration processes.


computer supported collaborative learning collaborative problem solving joint attention gaze overlap dual eye tracking 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barron, B.: When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(3), 307–359 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brooke, J.: System Usability Scale (SUS): A Quick-and-Dirty Method of System Evaluation User Information. Digital Equipment Co. Ltd., Reading (1986)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Çakir, M.P., Zemel, A., Stahl, G.: Interaction analysis of dual-interaction CSCL environments. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Rhodes, Greece (2009),
  4. 4.
    Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–16. Pergamon, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, NL (1999a)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., O’Malley, C.: The evolution of research in collaborative learning. In: Reiman, P., Spada, H. (eds.) Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards and Interdiciplinary Learning Science, pp. 189–211. Elsevier, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holtzblatt, L., Damianos, L., Weiss, D.: Factors impeding wiki use in the enterprise: A case study. In: Collective Intelligence Workshop at CSCW (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jermann, P., Nüssli, M.A.: Effects of sharing text selections on gaze recurrence and interaction quality in a pair programming task. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jermann, P., Nüssli, M.A., Mullins, D., Dillenbourg, P.: Collaborative gaze footprints: correlates of interaction quality. In: Proceedings of CSCL 2011, Hong Kong (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A.R., Smith, A.: Teens and social media (2007), (retrieved)
  10. 10.
    Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., Yuen, S., Judge, T.: Productive interrelationships between collaborative groups ease the challenges of dynamic and multi-teaming. CSCW Journal (2011), doi:10.1007/s10606-011-9154-yGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meier, A., Spada, H., Rummel, N.: A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2(1), 63–86 (2007), doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9005-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nüssli, M.A.: Dual eye-tracking methods for the study of remote collaborative problem-solving. PhD thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Richardson, D.C., Dale, R.: Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science 29, 1045–1060 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richardson, D.C., Dale, R., Spivey, M.J.: Eye movements in language and cognition: A brief introduction. In: Gonzalez- Marquez, M., Coulson, S., Mittelberg, I., Spivey, M.J. (eds.) Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sangin, M.: Peer Knowledge Modeling in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. PhD thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Soller, A., Martínez, A., Jermann, P., Muehlenbrock, M.: From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15(4), 261–290 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stahl, G.: Studying virtual math teams. Springer, New York (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D.: Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In: Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 409–426. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006), Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stahl, G., Mantoan, A., Weimar, S.: Demo: Collaborative dynamic mathematics in virtual math teams. Presented at the International Conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL, Madison, WI (2013),

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Selin Deniz Uzunosmanoğlu
    • 1
  • Murat Perit Çakir
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Education and Instructional Technology DepartmentMETUAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Cognitive Sciences DepartmentMETUAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations