Promoting Students’ Writing Skills in Science through an Educational Simulation: The GlobalEd 2 Project
Using a problem-based learning (PBL) approach, GlobalEd 2 (GE2) utilizes an interdisciplinary approach to learning writing, science, and social studies. Leveraging technologies commonly available in most middle grade classrooms (computers with Internet connections), GE2 engages classrooms of students as teams in simulated negotiations of international agreements on issues of global concern such as water resources and climate change. The impact of student interactions within the simulation on the writing self-efficacy and the ability to author evidenced-based arguments in science of 420 7th and 8th grade students across two states is presented. Results indicate that after participation in a GE2 simulation, students not only increased their writing self-efficacy, but also significantly increased the quality of their written scientific arguments.
KeywordsWriting Problem-based Learning (PBL) Simulation Self-Efficacy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Sadler, T.D. (ed.): Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Springer, NY (2011)Google Scholar
- 4.Osborne, J.F., Erduran, S., Simon, S.: Ideas, Evidence and Argument in Science. In-service Training Pack, Resource Pack and Video. Nuffield Foundation, London (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Osborne, J.F., Erduran, S., Simon, S., Monk, M.: Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review 82(301), 63–70 (2001)Google Scholar
- 9.Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., Scott, P.: Young people’s images of science. Open University Press, Philadelphia (1996)Google Scholar
- 14.Alozie, N., Moje, E.B., Kracik, J.S.: An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion among high school project-based science. Science Education 94, 395–427 (2010)Google Scholar
- 17.Levinson, R., Turner, S. (eds.): The teaching of social and ethical issues in the school curriculum, arising from developments in biomedical research: A research study of teachers. Institute of Education, London (2001)Google Scholar
- 18.Jonassen, D.H.: Assembling and analyzing the building blocks of problem-based learning environments. In: Silber, K.H., Foshay, W.R. (eds.) Handbook of Improving Performance in the Workplace, Volume One: Instructional Design and Training Delivery. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken (2009)Google Scholar
- 19.Koschmann, T.D., Kelson, A.C., Feltovich, P.J., Barrows, H.S.: Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In: Koschmann, T. (ed.) CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, pp. 83–124. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)Google Scholar
- 22.Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M., Perry, J.D.: Theory into practice: How do we link? In: Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D.J. (eds.) Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
- 23.Brown, S.W., Lawless, K.A., Boyer, M.A.: Expanding the Science and Literacy Curricular Space: The GlobalEd II Project. US Department of Education: The Institute of Education Sciences, IES. # R305A080622 (2008-2012)Google Scholar
- 24.Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M.: The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
- 25.Hayes, J.R.: A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In: Indrisano, R., Squire, J.R. (eds.) Perspectives on Writing: Research, Theory and Practice, pp. 6–44. International Reading Association, Newark (2000)Google Scholar