Advertisement

The Impact of Recommendation Agents’ Type of Voice on Perceived Social Presence, Trust and Users Intentions on an Insurance Website

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 293)

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate the influence that recommendation agent type voice may have on users reactions. Through experimentation, we compare the effects of human and synthetic voice on perceived social presence, recommendation agent trust, website trust and behavioral intentions. The findings suggest that the human voice is likely to provide a higher level of social presence and recommendation agent trust. The structural equation model shows that social presence has a positive effect both on recommendation agent trust and behavioral intentions. In turn, recommendation agent trust influences website trust and behavioral intentions. Finally, results show that website trust positively impacts behavioral intentions.

Keywords

recommendation agent human vs. synthetic voice social presence trust 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burgoon, J., Bonito, J.A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., Allspach, L.: Interactivity in human-computer interaction, a study of credibility, understanding and influence. Computers in Human Behavior 16, 553–574 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cassell, J., Bickmore, T.: External Manifestations of Trustworthiness in the Interface. Communications of the ACM 43(12), 50–56 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cowell, A.J., Stanney, K.M.: Manipulation of non-verbal interaction style and demographic embodiment to increase anthropomorphic computer character credibility. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62(2), 281–306 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Alessandro, C.: Qu’est ce que la synthèse vocale. Technolangue: le portail des technologies de la langue (2006), http://www.technolangue.net/article.php3?id_article=275 (in French)
  5. 5.
    D’Alessandro, C.: 33 ans de synthèse de la parole à partir du texte : une promenade sonore (1968-2001). Traitement Automatique des Langues 42(1), 1–29 (2001) (in French)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4), 177–190 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edlund, J., Gustafson, J., Heldner, M., Hjalmarsson, A.: Towards human-like spoken dialogue systems. Speech Communication 50(8-9), 630–645 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Evans, R.E., Kortum, P.: The impact of voice characteristics on user response in an interactive voice response system. Interacting with Computers 22, 606–614 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galanxhi, H., Nah, F.F.-H.: Deception in cyberspace: A comparison of text-only vs. avatar-supported medium. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(9), 770–783 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grichkovtsova, I., Morel, M., Lacheret, A.: The role of voice quality and prosodic contour in affective speech perception. Speech Communication 54, 414–429 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gulz, A., Haake, M.: Design of animated pedagogical agents—A look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(4), 322–339 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., Neumann, M.M.: The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing 70, 19–36 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keeling, K., McGoldrick, P., Beatty, S.: Avatars as salespeople: Communication style, trust, and intentions. Journal of Business Research 63(8), 793–800 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kohler, C.F., Rohm, A.J., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M.: Return on Interactivity: The Impact of Online Agents on Newcomer Adjustment. Journal of Marketing 75, 93–108 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, M.K., Jung, Y., Kim, J., Kim, S.R.: Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 962–973 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, K.M., Nass, C.: Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2003, vol. (5), p. 289 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lemoine, J.-F., Cherif, E.: What is the Best Virtual agent for my Website: An Exploratory Study of the Different Anthropomorphic Characteristics? In: The 33th Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, St. John’s Newfoundland Canada, June 9-12 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loiacono, E.T., Djamasbi, S., Kiryazov, T.: Factors that affect visually impaired users’ acceptance of audio and music websites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, 321–334 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McGoldrick, P.J., Keeling, K.A., Beatty, S.F.: A typology of roles for avatars in online retailing. Journal of Marketing Management 24(3-4), 433–461 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nowak, K.L., Rauh, C.: Choose your “buddy icon” carefully: The influence of avatar androgyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online interactions. Choose your “buddy icon” carefully: The influence of avatar androgyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online inte. Computers in Human Behavior 24(4), 1473–1493 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Qiu, L., Benbasat, I.: Online Consumer Trust and Live Help Interfaces: The Effects of Text-to-Speech Voice and Three-Dimensional Avatars. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 19(1), 75–94 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Qiu, L., Benbasat, I.: Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Virtual Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(4), 145–182 (2009a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qiu, L., Benbasat, I.: Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Virtual Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(4), 145–182 (2009b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stern, S.E., Mullennix, J.W., Yaroslavsky, I.: Persuasion and social perception of human vs. synthetic voice across person as source and computer as source conditions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(1), 43–52 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stern, S.E., Mullennix, J.W., Dyson, C., Wilson, S.J.: The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech. Human Factors 41, 588–595 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Steuer, J., Nass, C.I.: Voices, boxes and sources of messages computers and social actors. Human Communication Research 19(4), 504–527 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang, L.C., Baker, J., Wagner, J.A., Wakefield, K.: Can a Retail Web Site Be Social? Journal of Marketing 71, 143–157 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Trust in and Adoption of Online Virtual. Journal of Association for Information Systems 6(3), 72–101 (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Attributions of Trust in Decision Support Technologies: A Study of Virtual Agents for E-Commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(4), 249–273 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wongkia, W., Naruedomkul, K., Cercone, N.: i-Math: Automatic math reader for Thai blind and visually impaired students. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 64, 2128–2140 (2012)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris 1 Panthéon – SorbonneParisFrance
  2. 2.ESSCA School of managementAngersFrance

Personalised recommendations