Advertisement

A Flexible Network Management Framework Based on OpenFlow Technology

  • Chun-Chih Lo
  • Hsuan-Hsuan Chin
  • Mong-Fong Horng
  • Yau-Hwang Kuo
  • Jang-Pong Hsu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8482)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a network management framework based on OpenFlow technology, to enhance flexibility in network management to conform more service requirements from diverse user identities. To this aim, user-level based QoS differentiation is introduced to provide fine-grained handling of network flows under different user and service constraints. With user identity and service requirement in place, we are able to provide dynamic bandwidth adjustment with the support of traffic statistics and even allocate and share unutilized network resources to satisfy user service requirement and improve resource utilization in networks. Furthermore, we also present a unified but simple network management interface to help network administrators to manage a network as a single entity. With this interface, the agents in switches are developed to detect and response to anomalies of flows. In summary, the proposed framework improves the original OpenFlow framework to provide a flexible and agile way to manage networks with dynamic resource allocation and to meet the diverse QoS requirements in future cloud services.

Keywords

Software Defined Networking OpenFlow Network Management QoS Flexibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gude, N., Koponen, T., Pettit, J., Pfaff, B., Casado, M., McKeown, N., Shenker, S.: NOX: Towards an operating system for networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 38(3), 105–110 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Open Networking Foundation, https://www.opennetworking.org
  3. 3.
    McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., Turner, J.: Openflow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 38(2), 69–74 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sherwood, R., et al.: Carving research slices out of your production networks with OpenFlow. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 40(1), 129–130 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    OpenFlow in Europe: Linking Infrastructure and Application (OFELIA), http://www.fp7-ofelia.eu
  7. 7.
    Future Internet Research and Experimentation (FIRE), http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fire
  8. 8.
    Japan Giga Network 2 (JGN2), http://www.jgn.nict.go.jp/english
  9. 9.
    Hahm, J., Kim, B., Jeon, K.: The study of Future Internet platfom in ETRI. The Magazine of the IEEK 36(2), no. 3 (March 2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casado, M., Freedman, M.J., Pettit, J., Luo, J., McKeown, N., Shenker, S.: Ethane: taking control of the enterprise. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37(4), 1–12 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, H., Feamster, N.: Improving network management with software defined networking. IEEE Communications Magazine 51(2), 114–119 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chun-Chih Lo
    • 1
  • Hsuan-Hsuan Chin
    • 1
  • Mong-Fong Horng
    • 2
  • Yau-Hwang Kuo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jang-Pong Hsu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Center for Research of E-life DIgital Technology (CREDIT)National Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Electronic EngineeringNational Kaohsiung University of Applied SciencesTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Advance Multimedia Internet Technology Inc.TainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations