Probabilistic Intentionality Prediction for Target Selection Based on Partial Cursor Tracks
Pointing tasks, for example to select an object in an interface, constitute a significant part of human-computer interactions. This motivated several studies into techniques that facilitate the pointing task and improve its accuracy. In this paper, we introduce a number of intentionality prediction algorithms to determine the intended target a priori from partial cursor tracks. They yield notable reductions in the pointing time, aid effective selection assistance routines and enhance the overall pointing accuracy. A number of benchmark prediction models are also restated within a statistical framework and their probabilistic interpretation is utilised to calculate their corresponding outcomes. The relative performance of all considered predictors is assessed for point-click task data sets pertaining to both able-bodied and impaired users. Bayesian adaptive filtering is deployed to smooth highly perturbed mouse cursor tracks that are typically produced by motor impaired users undertaking a pointing task.
Keywordscursor movement target assistance intentionality prediction Bayesian inference
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bateman, S., Mandryk, R.L., Xiao, R., Gutwin, C.: Analysis and comparison of target assistance techniques for relative ray-cast pointing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 511–532 (2013)Google Scholar
- 8.Lane, D.M., Peres, S.C., Sándor, A., Napier, A.H.A.: A Process for Anticipating and Executing Icon Selection in Graphical User Interfaces. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 2, 243–254 (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Wobbrock, J.O., Fogarty, J., Liu, S., Kimuro, S., Harada, S.: The Angle Mouse: Target-Agnostic Dynamic Gain Adjustment Based on Angular Deviation. In: Proc. of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, pp. 1401–1410 (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Asano, T., Sharlin, E., Kitamura, Y., Takashima, K., Kishino, F.: Predictive interaction using the Delphian desktop. In: Proc. of the 186th Annual ACM Smp. on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2005), New York, pp. 133–141 (2005)Google Scholar
- 12.Lank, E., Cheng, Y.N., Ruiz, J.: Endpoint prediction using motion kinematicst. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, NY, pp. 637–646 (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Keates, S., Hwang, F., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., Robinson, P.: Cursor measures for motion-impaired computer users. In: Proc. of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies – ASSETS, New York, pp. 135–142 (2002)Google Scholar
- 14.Ziebart, B., Dey, A., Bagnell, J.A.: Probabilistic pointing target prediction via inverse optimal control. In: Proc. of the ACM Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 1–10 (2012)Google Scholar
- 15.Haug, A.: Bayesian Estimation and Tracking: A Practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons (2012)Google Scholar
- 16.Meucci, A.: Review of Statistical Arbitrage, Cointegration, and Multivariate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck. SSRN Preprint 1404905 (2010)Google Scholar