Advertisement

Abstract

We present an overview of recent works in which age is an important driving factor for Human-Computer Interaction design and development. These serve as starting grounds to discuss current practices and highlight challenges that might serve as beacons for future research in the field.

Keywords

age diversity overview 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aman, F., Vacher, M., Rossato, S., Portet, F.: Speech recognition of aged voice in the aal context: Detection of distress sentences. In: 2013 7th Conference on Speech Technology and Human - Computer Dialogue (SpeD), pp. 1–8 (October 2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anthony, L., Brown, Q., Tate, B., Nias, J., Brewer, R., Irwin, G.: Designing smarter touch-based interfaces for educational contexts. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 1–13 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antle, A.N.: Exploring how children use their hands to think: an embodied interactional analysis. Behaviour & Information Technology 32(9), 938–954 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arif, A.S., Sylla, C.: A comparative evaluation of touch and pen gestures for adult and child users. In: Proc.12th Int. Conf. on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 392–395. ACM, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aziz, N.: Children’s interaction with tablet applications: Gestures and interface design. Int. J. of Computer and Information Technology 2(3), 447–450 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ball, R., Hourcade, J.P.: Rethinking reading for age from paper and computers. Int. J. of HCI 27(11), 1066–1082 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barros, A.C., Ao, R.L., Ribeiro, J.: Design and evaluation of a mobile user interface for older adults: Navigation, interaction and visual design recommendations. In: Proc. DSAI (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brajnik, G., Giachin, C.: Using sketches and storyboards to assess impact of age difference in user experience. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies (2013) (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brewer, R., Anthony, L., Brown, Q., Irwin, G., Nias, J., Tate, B.: Using gamification to motivate children to complete empirical studies in lab environments. In: Proc.12th Int. Conf. on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 388–391 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown, Q., Anthony, L., Brewer, R., Irwin, G., Tate, J.N.B.: Challenge of replicating empirical studies with children in hci. In: Proc. RepliCHI 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheong, Y., Shehab, R.L., Ling, C.: Effects of age and psychomotor ability on kinematics of mouse-mediated aiming movement. Ergonomics 56(6), 1006–1020 (2013), pMID: 23586659Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choobeh, A.: An averaging technique for improving human age estimation algorithms. In: Proc. Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), pp. 868–870 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Culén, A., Bratteteig, T.: Touch-screens and elderly users: A perfect match? In: Proc. ACHI, pp. 460–465 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferreira, F., Almeida, N., Rosa, A.F., Oliveira, A., Pereira, J.C., Silva, S., Teixeira, A.J.S.: Elderly centered design for interaction — the case of the s4s medication assistant. In: Proc. DSAI (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Findlater, L., Froehlich, J.E., Fattal, K., Wobbrock, J.O., Dastyar, T.: Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Systems, pp. 343–346 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fitton, D., Read, J.C.C., Horton, M.: The challenge of working with teens as participants in interaction design. In: Proc. CHI 2013 EA Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 205–210. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Alcorn, A., Pain, H.: Conversing through and about technologies: Design critique as an opportunity to engage children with autism and broaden research(er) perspectives. Int. J. of CCI 1(2), 38–49 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gregor, P., Newell, A.F., Zajicek, M.: Designing for dynamic diversity: Interfaces for older people. In: Proc. Fifth Int. ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pp. 151–156. ACM, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guha, M.L., Druin, A., Fails, J.A.: Cooperative inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. Int. J. of CCI 1(1), 14–23 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hanson, V.: Technology skill and age: what will be the same 20 years from now? Universal Access in the Information Society 10(4), 443–452 (2011)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hertzum, M., Hornbaek, K.: How age affects pointing with mouse and touchpad: A comparison of young, adult, and elderly users. Int. J. of HCI 26(7), 703–734 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hwang, F., Hollinworth, N., Williams, N.: Effects of target expansion on selection performance in older computer users. ACM Trans. Access. 5(1), 1:1–1:26 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hwangbo, H., Yoon, S.H., Jin, B.S., Han, Y.S., Ji, Y.G.: A study of pointing performance of elderly users on smartphones. Int. J. of HCI 29(9), 604–618 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jochems, N., Vetter, S., Schlick, C.: A comparative study of information input devices for aging computer users. Behaviour & Information Technology 32(9), 902–919 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lane, A.E., Ziviani, J.M.: Factors influencing skilled use of the computer mouse by school-aged children. Computers & Education 55(3), 1112–1122 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leung, R., McGrenere, J., Graf, P.: Age-related differences in the initial usability of mobile device icons. Behaviour & Information Technology 30(5), 629–642 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leung, R., Tang, C., Haddad, S., Mcgrenere, J., Graf, P., Ingriany, V.: How older adults learn to use mobile devices: Survey and field investigations. ACM Trans. Access. 4(3), 11:1–11:33 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu, S., Joines, S.: Developing a framework of guiding interface design for older adults 56, 1967–1971 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Loureiro, B., Rodrigues, R.: Multi-touch as a natural user interface for elders: A survey. In: Proc. 6th Ib. Conf. on Inf. Sys. and Tech. (CISTI), pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lynch, K.R., Schwerha, D.J., Johanson, G.A.: Development of a weighted heuristic for website evaluation for older adults. Int. J. of HCI 29(6), 404–418 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Martens, M.: Issues of access and usability in designing digital resources for children. Library & Information Science Research 34(3), 159–168 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meiselwitz, G., Wentz, B., Lazar, J.: Universal usability: Past, present and future. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 3(4), 213–333 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moser, C.: Child-centered game development (ccgd): developing games with children at school. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17(8), 1647–1661 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nicol, E., Hornecker, E.: Using children’s drawings to elicit feedback on interactive museum prototypes. In: Proc.11th Int. Conf. on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 276–279. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pérez-Marín, D., Pascual-Nieto, I.: An exploratory study on how children interact with pedagogic conversational agents. Behaviour & Information Technology 32(9), 955–964 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Perrinet, J., Pañeda, X.G., Cabrero, S., Melendi, D., García, R., García, V.: Evaluation of virtual keyboards for interactive digital television applications. Int. J. of HCI 27(8), 703–728 (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Poole, E.S., Peyton, T.: Interaction design research with adolescents: methodological challenges and best practices. In: Proc.12th Int. Conf. on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 211–217. ACM, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Portet, F., Vacher, M., Golanski, C., Roux, C., Meillon, B.: Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: Acceptability and objection aspects. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 17(1), 127–144 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Punchoojit, L., Chintakovid, T.: Influence of age group differences on website cultural usability. In: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. ICT and Knowledge Eng., pp. 5–12 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Queirós, A., Cerqueira, M., Martins, A.I., Silva, A.G., Alvarelhão, J., Teixeira, A.J.S., Rocha, N.: Icf inspired personas to improve development for usability and accessibility in ambient assisted living. In: Proc. DSAI 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Read, J.C.C., Horton, M., Iversen, O., Fitton, D., Little, L.: Methods of working with teenagers in interaction design. In: Proc. CHI 2013 EA Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3243–3246. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Read, J., Markopoulos, P.: Child-computer interaction. Int. J. of CCI 1(1), 2–6 (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Renaud, K., Blignaut, R., Venter, I.: Designing mobile phone interfaces for age diversity in south africa: “one-world”versus diverse “islands”. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8119, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Revelle, G.: Applying developmental theory and research to the creation of educational games. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2013(139), 31–40 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Élvio Rodrigues, Carreira, M., Gonçalves, D.: Developing a multimodal inferface for the elderly. In: Proc. DSAI (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Romano Bergstrom, J.C., Olmsted-Hawala, E.L., Jans, M.E.: Age-related differences in eye tracking and usability performance: Website usability for older adults. Int. J. of HCI 29(8), 541–548 (2013)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rounding, K., Tee, K., Wu, X., Guo, C., Tse, E.: Evaluating interfaces with children. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17(8), 1663–1666 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Santrock, J.W.: Life-Span Development. Mc-Graw Hill (2011)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Steinberg, L.: Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(2), 69–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stoessel, C.: Gestural Interfaces for the Elderly Users: Help or Hindrance? Ph.D. thesis, Technischen Universität Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tan, J.L., Goh, D.H.L., Ang, R.P., Huan, V.S.: Child-centered interaction in the design of a game for social skills intervention. Comput. Entertain. 9(1), 2:1–2:17 (2011)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Teixeira, A.J.S., Pereira, C., e Silva, M.O., Alvarelhão, J., Silva, A., Cerqueira, M., Martins, A.I., Pacheco, O., Almeida, N., Oliveira, C., Costa, R., Neves, A.J.R., Queirós, A., Rocha, N.: New Telerehabilitation Services for the Elderly. In: Handbook of Research on ICTs for Healthcare and Social Services: Developments and Applications, pp. 109–132. IGI Global (2012)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vipperla, R., Renals, S., Frankel, J.: Ageing voices: the effect of changes in voice parameters on asr performance. EURASIP J. Audio Speech Music Process. 2010, 1–10 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review. Computers in Human Behavior 26(5), 870–882 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wandke, H., Sengpiel, M., Sönksen, M.: Myths about older people’s use of information and communication technology. Gerontology 58, 564–570 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Weiss, B., Möller, S., Schulz, M.: Modality preferences of different user groups. In: Proc. ACHI, pp. 354–359 (2012)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wirtz, S., Jakobs, E.M., M., Z.: Age-specific usability issues of software interfaces. In: Proc. 17th World Concress on Ergonomics (2009)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xie, B., Druin, A., Fails, J., Massey, S., Golub, E., Franckel, S., Schneider, K.: Connecting generations: developing co-design methods for older adults and children. Behaviour & Information Technology 31(4), 413–423 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhou, J., Rau, P.L.P., Salvendy, G.: Use and design of handheld computers for older adults: A review and appraisal. Int. J. of HCI 28(12), 799–826 (2012)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhou, J., Rau, P.L., Salvendy, G.: Age-related difference in the use of mobile phones. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–13 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Silva
    • 1
  • Daniela Braga
    • 2
  • António Teixeira
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Electronics and Telematics EngineeringUniversity of AveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Dep. of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics EngineeringUniversity of AveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations