An Experimental Approach in Conceptualizing Typographic Signals of Documents by Eight-Dot and Six-Dot Braille Code

  • Vassilios Argyropoulos
  • Aineias Martos
  • Georgios Kouroupetroglou
  • Sofia Chamonikolaou
  • Magda Nikolaraizi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8514)

Abstract

The main research aim of the present study focuses on issues of reading comprehension, when users with blindness receive typographic meta-data by touch through a braille display. Levels of reading comprehension are investigated by the use of 6-dot and 8-dot braille code in matched texts for the cases of bold and italic meta-data. The results indicated a slight superiority of the 8-dot braille code in reading time and scorings. The discussion considered the practical implications of the findings such as issues regarding education as well as the development of suitable design of tactile rendition of typographic signals through 6-dot or 8-dot braille code in favor of better perception and comprehension.

Keywords

typographic signals 6-dot braille 8-dot braille braille display blindness document accessibility assistive technology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kouroupetroglou, G.: Incorporating Typographic, Logical and Layout Knowledge of Documents into Text-to-Speech. In: Proc. of the 12th European Conference on Assistive Technologies (AAATE), Vilamoura, Portugal, September 19-22, pp. 708–713. IOS Press (2013), doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-304-9-708Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lorch, R.F.: Text-Signaling Devices and Their Effects on Reading and Memory Processes. Educational Psychology Review 1, 209–234 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kouroupetroglou, G., Tsonos, D.: Multimodal Accessibility of Documents. In: Pinder, S. (ed.) Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, I-Tech Education and Publishing, Vienna, pp. 451–470 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsonos, D., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Modeling Reader’s Emotional State Response on Document’s Typographic Elements. In: Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2011, Article ID 206983, pp. 1–18 (2011), doi:10.1155/2011/2069832011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Fourli-Kartsouni, F., Slavakis, K., Kouroupetroglou, G., Theodoridis, S.: A Bayesian Network Approach to Semantic Labelling of Text Formatting in XML Corpora of Documents. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4556, pp. 299–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen, H., Scherzer, P., Viau, R., Voss, P., Lepore, F.: Working memory for braille is shaped by experience. Communicative & Integrative Biology 4(2), 227–229 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braille Formats, Principles of Print-to-Braille Transcription, The Braille Authority of North America (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheryl-Kamei, H.: Creative typesets require innovative solutions: A study of differences in braille indicators. PhD thesis, Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation and School Psychology, The University of Arizona (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cook, A., Polgar, J.M.: Essentials of Assistive Technologies. Elsevier, St. Louis (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixon, J.: Eight-dot Braille. A Position Statement of the Braille Authority of North America (2007), http://www.brailleauthority.org/eightdot/eightdot.html
  12. 12.
    Kacorri, H., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Design and Developing Methodology for 8-dot Braille Code Systems. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8011, pp. 331–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diakidou, I.-A., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., Papageorgiou, P.: The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology 26, 55–80 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horiba, Y.: Reader control in reading: Effects of language competence, text type and task. Discourse Processes 29, 223–267 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearson, P.D., Johnson, D.: Teaching reading comprehension. Rinehart & Winston, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DuBravec, S., Dale, M.: Reader question formation as a tool for measuring comprehension: narrative and expository textual inferences in a second language. Journal of Research in Reading 25, 217–231 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vassilios Argyropoulos
    • 1
  • Aineias Martos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Georgios Kouroupetroglou
    • 2
  • Sofia Chamonikolaou
    • 1
  • Magda Nikolaraizi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece
  2. 2.Department of Informatics and TelecommunicationsNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations