Tailored versus Prioritized Configuration towards Accessibility – A Study on Weighted Preferences

  • Claudia Loitsch
  • Eleni Chalkia
  • Evangelos Bekiaris
  • Gerhard Weber
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8513)

Abstract

We present the results of a user study on human factors towards personalization and accessibility which was conducted with 97 participants (cognitive impaired, dyslexic, low digital literacy, visual impaired and elderly). Amongst others, the presented results gave insights on user weightings of requirements as well as on difficulties in customizing accessibility features of ICT products.

Keywords

User Experience User Preferences Personalization User Interface Adaptation for universal access Accessibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abou-Zahra: How People with Disabilities Use the Web. W3C (MIT, ERCIM, Keio) Status: Draft Updated (2012), http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/Overview
  2. 2.
    Clark, C., et al.: A Cloud-Scale Architecture for Inclusion: Cloud4all and GPII. In: Assistive Technology: From Research to Practice – Proceedings of AAATE 2013. IOS Press (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Findlater, L., McGrenere, J.: Beyond performance: Feature awareness in personalized interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(3), 121–137 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frydyada de Piotrowski, A.M., Tauber, M.J.: Benutzerprofile von Menschen mit Beeinträchtigungen/Fähigkeiten. In: Mensch & Computer: Grenzenlosfrei!?, pp. 33–42. Oldenburg Verlag, München (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hille, D.: Analysis and design of user-friendly interaction mechanism with a feedback system for personalisation. TechnischeUniversität Dresden. Dept. of Computer Science, IAI, 67 p. (2013) (Study Thesis)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO/IEC 24751. Information technology - Individualized adaptability and accessibility in elearning, education and training — Part 2: “Access for all” personal needs and preferences for digital delivery (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loitsch, C., et al.: Improving Accessibility by Matching User Needs and Preferences. In: Assistive Technology: From Research to Practice – Proceedings of AAATE 2013. IOS Press (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackay, W.E.: Triggers and barriers to customizing software. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 153–160. ACM (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melcher, V., Krüger, A., Chalkia, E.: Managing Preferences in the Cloud – Requirements and UI Design. In: Assistive Technology: From Research to Practice – Proceedings of AAATE 2013. IOS Press (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruth-Janneck, D.: MultidimensionaleKlassifizierung von Barrieren in Webanwendungen. In: Mensch & Computer: Grenzenlosfrei!?, pp. 13–22. Oldenburg Verlag, München (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vanderheiden, G., Treviranus, J.: Creating a global public inclusive infrastructure. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6765, pp. 517–526. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). WHO Press, Geneva (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Loitsch
    • 1
  • Eleni Chalkia
    • 2
  • Evangelos Bekiaris
    • 2
  • Gerhard Weber
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of DresdenGermany
  2. 2.Hellenic Institute of TransportCentre for Research and Technology HellasGreece

Personalised recommendations