Advertisement

Proposal for the Conduct of Design Science Research

  • Aline DreschEmail author
  • Daniel Pacheco Lacerda
  • José Antônio Valle AntunesJr
Chapter
  • 3.7k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter proposes a method for conducting design science research. Recommendations for researchers who wish to use this research method are also presented. To develop this proposal, activities that may support research conduct with reliable and relevant results have been considered. It is important to highlight that this research method can be applied in other areas beyond management, with the objective of designing and constructing artifacts or prescribing solutions.

Keywords

Systematic Literature Review Satisfactory Solution Evaluation Step Design Science Traditional Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alturki, A., Gable, G. G., & Bandara, W. A. (2011). Design science research Roadmap. DESRIST Proceedings. Milwaukee: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Andrade, L. A., et al. (2006). Pensamento Sistêmico: Caderno de Campo (Systemic Thinking: Field Notes). Porto Alegre: Bookman.Google Scholar
  3. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., & Venable, J. (2009). Soft design science methodology. DESRIST Proceedings. Malvern: ACM.Google Scholar
  4. Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. C., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunge, M. (1980). Epistemologia (Epistemology). São Paulo: TA Queiroz Editora Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, R. et al. (2005). Being proactive: Where action research meets design research. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  7. Eekels, J., & Roozenburg, N. F. M. (1991). A methodological comparison of the structures of scientific research and engineering design: their similarities and differences. Design Studies, 12(4), 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibbons, M., et al. (1994a). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Great Britain, USA: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Goldratt, E. M. (1990). What is thing called theory of constraints and how should it be implemented?. New York: North River Press.Google Scholar
  10. Goldratt, E. M. (1994). It’s not luck. Barrington, USA: North River Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gregor, S. (2009). Building theory in the sciences of the artificial. DESRIST, May 7–8, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 312–335.Google Scholar
  13. Manson, N. J. (2006). Is operations research really research? ORION, 22(2), 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. March, S. T., & Storey, V. C. (2008). Design science in the information systems discipline: An introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 725–730.Google Scholar
  15. Morandi, M. I. W. M. et al. (2013) Foreseeing iron ore prices using system thinking and scenario planning. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27, 1–20.Google Scholar
  16. Nunamaker, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. M. (1991). Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89–106.Google Scholar
  17. Peffers, K. et al. (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.Google Scholar
  18. Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference : Organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
  20. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Takeda, H., et al. (1990). Modeling design processes. AI Magazine, 11(4), 37–48.Google Scholar
  22. Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, W. (2011) Design Research in Information Systems. Retrieved December 2011, from, http://desrist.org/design-research-in-information-systems.
  23. van Aken, J. E., Berends, H., & van der Bij, H. (2012a). Problem-solving in organizations (2nd ed., p. 235). Cambridge, UK: University Press Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Venable, J. R. (2006) The role of theory and theorising in design science research. DESRIST (pp. 1–18), February 24–25 2006.Google Scholar
  25. Walls, J. G., Wyidmeyer, G. R., & Sawy, O. A. E. (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3, 36–60.Google Scholar
  26. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Great Britain, USA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Gibbons, M., et al. (1994b). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Great Britain, USA: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. van Aken, J. E., Berends, & H., van der Bij, H. (2012). Problem solving in organizations (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aline Dresch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Pacheco Lacerda
    • 1
  • José Antônio Valle AntunesJr
    • 1
  1. 1.GMAP | UNISINOSPorto Alegre-RSBrazil

Personalised recommendations