Advertisement

General Aspects Related to Research in Management

  • Aline DreschEmail author
  • Daniel Pacheco Lacerda
  • José Antônio Valle AntunesJr
Chapter
  • 3.7k Downloads

Abstract

Research in management should attempt to bring together two realities—theory and practice. Although they may seem distant from one another, both theory and practice seek to create knowledge that can be applied to improve existing systems or, rather, to help in the design and conception of new systems, products, or services.

Keywords

Research Method Knowledge Production Problem Class Systematic Literature Review Research Rigor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andery, M. A., et al. (2004). Para compreender a ciência: uma perspectiva histórica [To understand science: a historical perspective]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora EDUC.Google Scholar
  2. Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating design : A review of forty years of design research. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Design Issues, 20(1), 16–29.Google Scholar
  3. Cantamessa, M. (2003). An empirical perspective upon design research. Journal of Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chakrabarti, A. (2010). A course for teaching design research methodology. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(03), 317–334.Google Scholar
  5. Craighead, C. W., & Meredith, J. M. (2008). Operations management research: evolution and alternative future paths. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(8), 710–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (1990). Can organizations studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organization Science, 1(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (2008). Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization Science, 19(I), 177–183.Google Scholar
  8. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & van Aken, J. E. (2008) Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393–413.Google Scholar
  9. Ford, E. W., et al. (2003). Mitigating risks, visible hands, inevitable disasters, and soft variables: Management research that matters to managers. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbons, M., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Great Britain: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Goldratt, E. M. (2008). The choice. USA: The North River Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1346–1352.Google Scholar
  13. Hatchuel, A. (2009). A foundationalist perspective for management research: A European trend and experience. Management Decision, 47(9), 1458–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hevner, A. R., et al. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.Google Scholar
  15. Järvinen, P. (2007). Action research is similar to design science. Quality & Quantity, 41(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, A. S., & Hubona, G. S. (2009). A scientific basis for rigor in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 237–262.Google Scholar
  17. Manson, N. J. (2006). Is operations research really research? ORiON, 22(2), 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pandza, K., & Thorpe, R. (2010). Management as design, but what kind of design? An appraisal of the design science analogy for management. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peffers, K. et al. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.Google Scholar
  21. Platts, K. W. (1993). A process approach to researching manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(8), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Plsek, P., Bibby, J., & Whitby, E. (2007). Practical methods for extracting explicit design rules grounded in the experience of organizational managers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43,(1), 153–170.Google Scholar
  23. Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference : Organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Romme, A. G. L., & Damen, I. C. M. (2007). Toward science-based design in organization development: Codifying the process. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(1), 108–121.Google Scholar
  25. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  26. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Slack, N., Lewis, M., & Bates, H. (2009). The two worlds of operations management research and practice: Can they meet, should they meet? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(4), 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Starkey, K., Hatchuel, A., & Tempest, S. (2009). Management research and the new logics of discovery and engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12(n), S3–S26.Google Scholar
  30. Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, A., & Taylor, M. (2009). Operations management research: contemporary themes, trends and potential future directions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(12), 1316–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tremblay, M. C., Hevner, A. R., & Berndt, D. J. (2010). Focus groups for artifact refinement and evaluation in design research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(June), 599–618.Google Scholar
  33. van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Aken, J. E., Berends, H., & van der Bij, H. (2012). Problem solving in organizations (2nd ed., p. 235). Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van Aken, J. E., & Romme, G. (2009). Reinventing the future: adding design science to the repertoire of organization and management studies. Organization Management Journal, 6(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Worren, N. A., Moore, K., & Elliott, R. When theories become tools: Toward a framework for pragmatic validity. Human Relations, 55(10), 1227–1250.Google Scholar
  38. Xu, L., & Chen, J. (2011) Technological rules based business models analysis: A design science approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(9), 113–122.Google Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Ford, E. W., et al. (2003). Mitigating risks, visible hands, inevitable disasters, and soft variables: Management research that matters to managers. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aline Dresch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Pacheco Lacerda
    • 1
  • José Antônio Valle AntunesJr
    • 1
  1. 1.GMAP|UNISINOSPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations