Advertisement

Gassendi’s Attack on Dogmatic Science

  • José R. Maia Neto
Chapter
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 215)

Abstract

The examination of Gassendi’s first work, The Paradoxical Exercises Against the Aristotelians, in particular its first book published in 1624, shows that it develops Charron’s view of dogmatic science as one of the four enemies of Academic skeptical wisdom. The support of philosophical freedom against the authority of Aristotle in the schools is based on the Academic skeptics’ concept of intellectual integrity, which is foundational in Charron’s conception of wisdom. Gassendi’s epistemological development of Charron’s skeptical wisdom is related to La Mothe Le Vayer’s mainly moral and religious development (examined in Chap. 4) and contrasted to Descartes’s (examined in Chap. 5).

Keywords

Safe Harbor Philosophical School Intellectual Integrity Skeptical Doubt Universal Proposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Baillet, Adrien. 1691. La Vie de Descartes, 2 vols. Paris: D. Horthemels.Google Scholar
  2. Bayle, Pierre. 1969. Dictionnaire historique et critique, 16 vols. Genève: Slatkine Reprints.Google Scholar
  3. Berr, Henri. 1960. Du Scepticisme de Gassendi. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, Olivier. 1971. La philosophie de Gassendi. Nominalisme, matérialisme et métaphysique. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  5. Brundell, Barry. 1987. Pierre Gassendi. From Aristotelianism to a new natural philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. Casini, Lorenzo. 2009. Self-knowledge, scepticism and the quest for a new method: Juan Luis Vives on cognition and the impossibility of perfect knowledge. In Renaissance scepticisms, ed. G. Paganini and J.R. Maia Neto, 33–60. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Charron, Pierre. 1970. Toutes les œuvres de Pierre Charron, 2 vols. Genève: Slatkine Reprints.Google Scholar
  8. Charron, Pierre. 1986. De la Sagesse. Texte établie par B. de Negroni. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  9. de Montaigne, Michel. 2004. Les Essais, Nouvelle édition Villey-Saulnier en 1 volume. Paris: Quadrige/PUF.Google Scholar
  10. Dear, Peter. 1988. Mersenne and the learning of the schools. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Descartes, René. 1996. Œuvres, 12 vols. Publiées par Ch. Adam and P. Tannery. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, Saul. 2005. Pierre Gassendi’s philosophy and science: Atomism for empiricists. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  13. Galen. 1985. An outline of empiricism. In Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Trans. R. Walzer and M. Frede. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  14. Gassendi, Pierre. 1658. Opera omnia, 6 vols. Lyon: L. Anisson.Google Scholar
  15. Gassendi, Pierre. 1959. Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus aritoteleos. Texte établi, traduit et annoté par B. Rochot. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  16. Gassendi, Pierre. 1962. Disquisitio metaphysica seu dubitationes et instantiae adversus Renati Cartesii metaphysicam et responsa. Texte établie, traduit et annoté par B. Rochot. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  17. Gassendi, Pierre. 1972. Selected Works. Trans. C. Brush. New York: Johnson Reprints.Google Scholar
  18. Gassendi, Pierre. 2004. Lettres latines, 2 vols. Traduction et notes par S. Taussig. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  19. Glanvill, Joseph. 1978. Scepsis scientifica: Or, confessed ignorance, the way to science. New York/London: Garland.Google Scholar
  20. Jardine, Lisa. 1983. Lorenzo Valla: Academic skepticism and the new humanist dialectic. In The skeptical tradition, ed. Myles Burnyeat, 253–286. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, Howard. 1981. Pierre Gassendi: An intellectual biography. Nieuwkoop: B. de Graaf.Google Scholar
  22. Joy, Lynn S. 1987. Gassendi the atomist: Advocate of history in an age of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. La Mothe Le Vayer, François. 1988. Dialogues faits à l’imitation des anciens. Texte établie par A. Pessel. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  24. Locke, John. 1975. An essay concerning human understanding. Edited with a foreword by P. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  25. LoLordo, Antonia. 2007. Pierre Gassendi and the birth of early modern philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Maia Neto, José R. 2013. Le probabilisme académicien dans le scepticisme français de Montaigne à Descartes. Revue philosophique de la France et l’étranger 4: 467–484.Google Scholar
  27. Osler, Margaret. 1985. Baptizing Epicurean atomism: Pierre Gassendi on the immortality of the soul. In Religion, science and worldview: Essays in honor of Richard S. Westfall, ed. M. Osler and P.L. Farber, 163–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Paganini, Gianni. 1991. Scepsi moderna. Interpretazioni dello scetticismo da Charron a Hume. Busento: Cosenza.Google Scholar
  29. Popkin, Richard H. 2003. The history of scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Romanell, Patrick. 1991. The scientific and medical genealogy of Locke’s “historical and plain method”. In John Locke: Critical assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft, 476–487. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Schmitt, Charles. 1972. Cicero scepticus. A study of the influence of The Academica in the Renaissance. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, Catherine. 2008. Epicureanism at the origins of modernity. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • José R. Maia Neto
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations