Advertisement

An Optimization Model in Support of Biomass Co-firing Decisions in Coal Fired Power Plants

  • Sandra D. Eksioglu
  • Hadi Karimi
Chapter
Part of the EcoProduction book series (ECOPROD)

Abstract

This chapter provides an optimization model to aid with biomass co-firing decisions in coal fired power plants. Co-firing is a strategy that can be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at coal plants. Co-firing is a practice that impacts logistics-related costs, capital investments, plant efficiency, and tax credit collected. The linear mixed-integer programming model we present captures the relationship that exists between biomass usage and the corresponding costs and savings due to production of renewable electricity. We test the performance of the model proposed on a case study developed using data from the State of Mississippi. We perform a sensitivity analyses in order to evaluate the impact of biomass purchasing costs, biomass transportation costs, investment costs, and production tax credit on the cost of renewable electricity.

Keywords

Biomass supply chain Mixed integer programming Co-firing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSF grant CMMI 1052671. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Caputo AC, Palumbo M, Pelagagge PM, Scacchia F (2005) Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. Biomass Bioenergy 28:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De S, Assadi M (2009) Impact of cofiring biomass with coal in power plants: a techno-economic assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 33:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Energy Information Administration (2013a) Annual energy outlook 2013. Available on-line at: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/MT-electric.cfm#solar−photo
  4. Energy Information Administration (2013b) Annual energy outlook: energy markets summary. Available on-line at: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/tables/pdf/1tab.pdf
  5. Energy Information Administration (2013c) Most states have renewable portfolio standards. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=4850
  6. International Energy Agency (2009) World energy outlook. Available on-line at: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2009/WEO2009.pdf
  7. Knowledge Discovery Framework (2013) U.S. billion ton update. Available on line at: https://bioenergykdf.net/content/billiontonupdate
  8. National Energy Technology Laboratory (2005) Available on-line at: http://www.netl.doe.gov/energyanalyses/hold/technology.html
  9. Searcy E, Flynn P, Ghafoori E, Kumar A (2007) The relative cost of biomass energy transport. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137:639–652Google Scholar
  10. Sondreal EA, Benson SA, Hurley JP, Mann MD, Pavlish JH, Swanson ML (2001) Review of advances in combustion technology and biomass cofiring. Fuel Process Technol 71:7–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tillman DA (2000) Biomass cofiring: the technology, the experience, the combustion consequences. Biomass Bioenergy 19:365–384Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringMississippi State UniversityStarkvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations