When China Encounters Smart TV: Exploring Factors Influencing the User Adoption in China

  • Yuming Tao
  • Jing Chang
  • Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8528)


Smart TVs, providing users with the access to abundant number of Internet video contents as well as other ‘smart’ functionalities, are gradually becoming more and more popular within Chinese households. Chinese internet companies and TV manufactures has been actively developing two forms of smart TV, namely embedded smart TVs and smart set-top boxes. The objective of the study is to explore the factors that affect user adoption of both the embedded smart TV and the set-top box and comprehensively analyze the difference in user adoption of the two smart TV forms. We carried out an online survey and collected 245 valid responses. With the help of exploratory factor analysis and hierarchical multiple regression analysis, we built a smart TV user adoption model based on TAM with 6 antecedent factors. The model helps to explain the difference between user adoption of embedded smart TV and smart set-top box and also figured out that perceived usefulness on video functionality is the priority concerns for developing both embedded smart TV and smart set-top box.


Smart TV Set-top box Technology Acceptance Model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Zillmann, D.: The coming of media entertainment. In: Zillmann, D., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Media Entertainment: The Psychology of Its Appeal, pp. 1–20. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, J., Liu, Y., Rau, P.L.P., Li, H., Wang, X., Li, D.: How socio-economic structure influences rural users’ acceptance of mobile entertainment. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2203–2212. ACM (April 2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cabrer, M.R., Redondo, R.P.D., Vilas, A.F., Pazos Arias, J.J., Duque, J.G.: Controlling the smart home from TV. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 52(2), 421–429 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Everett, R.: Diffusion of innovations, vol. 5, pp. 11–27. The Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bandura, A.: Self-Efficacy Mechanismin Human Agency. American Psychologist 37(2), 122–147 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beach, L.R., Mitchell, T.R.: A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies. Academy of Management Review 3(3), 439–449 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tornatzky, L. G., Klein, K.J.: Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption - Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 29(1), 28–45 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2), 186–204 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park, C., Jun, J.K.: A cross-cultural comparison of Internet buying behavior: Effects of Internet usage, perceived risks, and innovativeness. International Marketing Review 20(5), 534–553 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garcia, R., Calantone, R.: A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(2), 110–132 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lu, J., Yao, J.E., Yu, C.S.: Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14(3), 245–268 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., Kleijnen, M.: Customer adoption of e-service: an experimental study. International Journal of Service Industry Management 12(2), 184–207 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shin, D.H., Hwang, Y., Choo, H.: Smart TV: are they really smart in interacting with people? Understanding the interactivity of Korean Smart TV. Behaviour & Information Technology 32(2), 156–172 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, B., Caputi, P., Rawstorne, P.: The development of a measure of subjective computer experience. Computers in Human Behavior 23(1), 127–145 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hair, J.F., et al.: Multivariate data analysis: with readings. Macmillan (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stiggelbout, A.M., Molewijk, A.C., Otten, W., Timmermans, D.R.M., Van Bockel, J.H., Kievit, J.: Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views. Journal of Medical Ethics 30(3), 268–274 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuming Tao
    • 1
  • Jing Chang
    • 1
  • Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingP.R. China

Personalised recommendations