Advertisement

Building the Co-design and Making Platform to Support Participatory Research and Development for Smart City

  • Zhiyong Fu
  • Xu Lin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8528)

Abstract

This paper focuses in particular on the participatory innovation model in the context of smart city in China. Based on the practices from design thinking, living lab and maker space, we integrated the action researches and participatory practices in our smart city R&D projects. The integrated co-design process will facilitate the interdisciplinary professionals, open communities and citizens to involve in the smart city design. This paper present our co-design framework, which combines the exploration of the territory, integration of stakeholders’ resource and issues, ideation of co-created experimentations, implementation of solution, products and service, and evaluation of conclusion & outcomes into a holistic process. The case study on crowd sourcing environmental solution project that applied the co-design model of development and participatory evaluation was launched as pilot in Beijing. These will be the helpful reference and support for the co-design practice in the city of China.

Keywords

Co-design Smart City Open Platform Living Lab Makerspace 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yigitcanlar, T.: Urban management revolution: intelligent management systems for ubiquitous cities, In: The International Symposium on Land, Transport and Marine Technology (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naphade, M., Banavar, G., Harrison, C., Paraszczak, J., Morris, R.: Smarter Cities and Their Innovation Challenges. Computer 44, 32–39 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P.: Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology 18, 65–82 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibson, W.: Life in the Meta City. Scientific American 305, 88–89 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salem, M., Schonowski, J., Küpper, A.: Citizen-centric Smart Cities: M-Technology for realizing Smart Participatory Urban Sensing in E-Government. Information Technology & Computer Science 12(1), 82–92 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Govt backing essential to success of ‘smart cities’, http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-12/27/content_17200951.htm
  9. 9.
    Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 4(1), 5–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steen, M., Kuiper-Hoyng, L., de Boer, J., Visser, F.S.: Co-design: Practices, Challenges and Lessons Learned. In: 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 561–562. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Townsend, A.M.: Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. W. W. Norton & Company, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cruickshank, P., Deakin, M.: Co-design in Smart Cities. Technical Report, SmartCities Project of Institute for Informatics and Digital Innovation, Edinburgh Napier University (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Bergvall-Kareborn, B., Stahlbröst, A.: Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 1(4), 356–370 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Membership Application ENOLL 6TH WAVE: Smart City Living Lab, http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/sites/enoll.org/files/021_ENoLL6W_FR_SmartCityLL_POUR_ENVOI.pdf
  18. 18.
    Higgins, A., Klein, S.: Introduction to the Living Lab Approach. In: Tan, Y., Bjorn-Andersen, N., Klein, S., Rukanova, B. (eds.) Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT-Innovation: ITAIDE tools and methods, pp. 31–36. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Make Magazine. Is it a Hackerspace, Makerspace, TechShop, or FabLab? Google Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Lindtner, S.: Li, David, 2012. Created in China. The Makings of China’s Hackerspace Community. In: Interactions, XIX.6, p. 18 (November, December 2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosner, D., Bean, J.: Learning from IKEA Hacking: I’m Not One to Decoupage a Tabletop and Call It a Day. In: Creative Thought and Self-Improvement, CHI 2009, pp. 419–422. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kafai, Y.B., Peppler, K.A.: Youth, Technology, and DIY: Developing Participatory Competencies in Creative Media Production. Review of Research in Education 35, 89–119 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harrop, P.: Open Sourcery: When Hacker Culture Informs the Design Studio. Journal of Architectural Education 69(1), 69–72 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kafai, Y.B., Peppler, K.A.: Youth, Technology, and DIY: Developing Participatory Competencies in Creative Media Production. Review of Research in Education 35(1), 89–119 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Future Now, The IFTF Blog. Maker Cities, http://www.iftf.org/future-now/article-detail/maker-cities2/
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Rick Robinson’s Blog, http://theurbantechnologist.com/
  30. 30.
    Smart City, — International Design Exhibition (2013), http://www.modachina.org/en/page/activity-534.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiyong Fu
    • 1
  • Xu Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Art and DesignTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations