The Impact of Psychoinformatics on Internet Addiction

  • Christian MontagEmail author
  • Martin Reuter
  • Alexander Markowetz
Part of the Studies in Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavioral Economics book series (SNPBE)


Psychoinformatics refers to the new collaboration between the disciplines computer science and psychology to study psychological phenotypes by means of data mining. The present chapter gives an overview of how Psychoinformatics can aid research and therapy in the context of Internet addiction.


Internet Addiction Online Session Short Text Message Longe Time Window Present Chapter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Beck AT (2002) Cognitive models of depression. Clin Adv Cogn Psychother Theor Appl 14:29–61Google Scholar
  2. Campion MA, Pursell ED, Brown BK (1988) Structured interviewing: raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Pers Psychol 41:25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edwards AL (1957) The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Dryden Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Jenaro C, Flores N, Gómez-Vela M et al (2007) Problematic internet and cell-phone use: Psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addict Res Theor 15:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson TP, van de Vijver FJ (2003) Social desirability in cross-cultural research. Cross Cult Surv Methods 195–204Google Scholar
  6. Kim K, Ryu E, Chon MY et al (2006) Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 43:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Markowetz A, Błaszkiewicz K, Montag C et al (2014) Psycho-Informatics: Big Data shaping modern psychometrics. Med Hypotheses 82:405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller PR, Dasher R, Collins R et al (2001) Inpatient diagnostic assessments: 1. Accuracy of structured vs. unstructured interviews. Psychiatry Res 105:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Montag C, Bey K, Sha P et al (2014) Is it meaningful to distinguish between generalized and specific Internet addiction? Evidence from a cross-cultural study from Germany, Sweden. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, Taiwan and ChinaGoogle Scholar
  10. Montag C, Błaszkiewicz K, Lachmann B et al. (accepted) Correlating personality and actual phone usage: evidence from psychoinformatics. J Individ DifferGoogle Scholar
  11. Park MH, Park EJ, Choi J et al (2011) Preliminary study of internet addiction and cognitive function in adolescents based on IQ tests. Psychiatry Res 190:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Potter J, Hepburn A (2005) Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities. Qual Res Psychol 2:281–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Riskind JH, Beck AT, Berchick RJ et al (1987) Reliability of DSM-III diagnoses for major depression and generalized anxiety disorder using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE (1998) The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychol Bull 124:262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sugarman DB, Hotaling GT (1997) Intimate violence and social desirability a meta-analytic review. J Interpersonal Violence 12:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tao R, Huang X, Wang J et al (2010) Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Addiction 105:556–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wiesner WH, Cronshaw SF (1988) A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview*. J Occup Psychol 61:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wright JH, Beck AT (1983) Cognitive therapy of depression: theory and practice. Psychiatric Serv 34:1119–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Montag
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Reuter
    • 2
    • 4
  • Alexander Markowetz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.Center for Economics and NeuroscienceUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  3. 3.Department for InformaticsUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations