The Effect of Automatic Reassessment and Relearning on Assessing Student Long-Term Knowledge in Mathematics
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) give assessments to estimate a student’s current knowledge. A great deal of work in the past years, (e.g. KDD Cup2010) has focused on predict students immediate next performance, while what is important is will the student retain that knowledge for later use. Some previous studies such as Wang, et al, Xiong, et al. have started to investigate this question by trying to predict student retention after a time interval of several days. We created a novel system that would automatically reassess and allow students to relearn the material to enhance a student’s long-term knowledge. It is showed before that this intervention raised student learning, and now we are wondering if it also makes assessment of student long-term knowledge better (i.e, more predictive power). The result shows that the reassessment and relearning information is very useful in assessing student long-term knowledge.
KeywordsIntelligent Tutoring System dynamic assessment reassessment and relearning long-term knowledge student modeling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Wang, Y., Beck, J.: Incorporating Factors Influencing Knowledge Retention into a Student Model. In: Proceedings of the Educational Data Mining Conference 2012, pp. 201–203 (2012)Google Scholar
- 2.Xiong, X., Li, S., Beck, J.E.: Will You Get It Right Next Week: Predict Delayed Performance in Enhanced ITS Mastery Cycle. In: FLAIRS Conference 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
- 3.Sternburg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L.: Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
- 4.Brown, A.L., Bryant, N.R., Campione, J.C.: Preschool children’s learning and transfer of matrices problems: Potential for improvement. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development meetings, Detroit (1983)Google Scholar
- 5.Campione, J.C., Brown, A.L.: Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data. Technical Report No. 361. Cambridge, MA: Illinois University, Urbana. Center for the Study of Reading. ED269735 (1985)Google Scholar
- 6.Attali, Y.: Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers: Application of a Graded Response IRT Model. Applied Psychological Measurement (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Feng, M., Beck, J., Heffernan, N., Koedinger, K.: Can an Intelligent Tutoring System Predict Math Proficiency as Well as a Standardized Test? In: Baker, Beck (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Data Mining, pp. 107–116 (2008)Google Scholar