Advertisement

Using an Intelligent Tutoring System to Support Collaborative as well as Individual Learning

  • Jennifer K. Olsen
  • Daniel M. Belenky
  • Vincent Aleven
  • Nikol Rummel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8474)

Abstract

Collaborative learning has been shown to be beneficial for older students, but there has not been much research to show if these results transfer to elementary school students. In addition, collaborative and individual modes of instruction may be better for acquiring different types of knowledge. Collaborative Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) provide a platform that may be able to provide both the cognitive and collaborative support that students need. This paper presents a study comparing collaborative and individual methods while receiving instruction on either procedural or conceptual knowledge. The collaborative groups had the same learning gains as the individual groups in both the procedural and conceptual learning conditions but were able to do so with fewer problems. This work indicates that by embedding collaboration scripts in ITSs, collaborative learning can be an effective instructional method even with young children.

Keywords

Problem solving collaborative learning intelligent tutoring system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, W., Looi, C.: Group Scribbles-Supported Collaborative Learning in a Primary Grade 5 Science Class. In: Suthers, D.D., Lund, K., Rose, C.P., Teplovs, C., Law, N. (eds.) Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions, pp. 257–263. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dillenbourg, P., Jermann, P.: Designing integrative scripts. In: Scripting Computer-Supported Communication of Knowledge. Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives, pp. 275–301. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gillies, R.M., Boyle, M.: Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education 26(4), 933–940 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hausmann, R.G., Chi, M.T., Roy, M.: Learning from collaborative problem solving: An analysis of three hypothesized mechanisms. In: 26nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 547–552 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: The knowledge-learning-instruction (KLI) framework: Toward bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kollar, I., Fischer, F., Hesse, F.W.: Collaboration scripts–a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review 18(2), 159–185 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janssen, J., Bodemer, D.: Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist 48(1), 40–55 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lazakidou, G., Retalis, S.: Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education 54(1), 3–13 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., d’Apollonia, S.: Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 71(3), 449–521 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mullins, D., Rummel, N., Spada, H.: Are two heads always better than one? Differential effects of collaboration on students’ computer-supported learning in mathematics. Int’l Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6(3), 421–443 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olsen, J.K., Belenky, D.M., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Sewall, J., Ringenberg, M.: Authoring collaborative intelligent tutoring systems. In: Kumar, R., Kim, J. (eds.) Proceedings 2nd Workshop on Intelligent Support for Learning in Groups at the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligent in Education, pp. 1–10 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Rohrbach, S.: Sense making alone doesn’t do it: Fluency matters too! ITS Support for Robust Learning with Multiple Representations. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 174–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R.S., Alibali, M.W.: Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology 93(2), 346 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slavin, R.E.: Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21(1), 43–69 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stamper, J.C., Koedinger, K.R.: Human-machine student model discovery and improvement using DataShop. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 353–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsuei, M.: Development of a peer‐assisted learning strategy in computer‐supported collaborative learning environments for elementary school students. British Journal of Educational Technology 42(2), 214–232 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walker, E., Rummel, N., Koedinger, K.: CTRL: A research framework for providing adaptive collaborative learning support. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research (UMUAI) 19(5), 387–431 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walker, E., Rummel, N., McLaren, B.M., Koedinger, K.R.: The student becomes the master: Integrating peer tutoring with cognitive tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 751–753. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Westermann, K., Rummel, N.: Delaying Instruction – Evidence from a Study in a University Relearning Setting. Instructional Science 40(4), 673–689 (2012), doi:0.1007/s11251-012-9207-8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer K. Olsen
    • 1
  • Daniel M. Belenky
    • 1
  • Vincent Aleven
    • 1
  • Nikol Rummel
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Human Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Educational ResearchRuhr-Universität BochumGermany

Personalised recommendations