Using an Intelligent Tutoring System to Support Collaborative as well as Individual Learning
Collaborative learning has been shown to be beneficial for older students, but there has not been much research to show if these results transfer to elementary school students. In addition, collaborative and individual modes of instruction may be better for acquiring different types of knowledge. Collaborative Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) provide a platform that may be able to provide both the cognitive and collaborative support that students need. This paper presents a study comparing collaborative and individual methods while receiving instruction on either procedural or conceptual knowledge. The collaborative groups had the same learning gains as the individual groups in both the procedural and conceptual learning conditions but were able to do so with fewer problems. This work indicates that by embedding collaboration scripts in ITSs, collaborative learning can be an effective instructional method even with young children.
KeywordsProblem solving collaborative learning intelligent tutoring system
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Dillenbourg, P., Jermann, P.: Designing integrative scripts. In: Scripting Computer-Supported Communication of Knowledge. Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives, pp. 275–301. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Hausmann, R.G., Chi, M.T., Roy, M.: Learning from collaborative problem solving: An analysis of three hypothesized mechanisms. In: 26nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 547–552 (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: The knowledge-learning-instruction (KLI) framework: Toward bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Olsen, J.K., Belenky, D.M., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Sewall, J., Ringenberg, M.: Authoring collaborative intelligent tutoring systems. In: Kumar, R., Kim, J. (eds.) Proceedings 2nd Workshop on Intelligent Support for Learning in Groups at the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligent in Education, pp. 1–10 (2013)Google Scholar
- 12.Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Rohrbach, S.: Sense making alone doesn’t do it: Fluency matters too! ITS Support for Robust Learning with Multiple Representations. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 174–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Walker, E., Rummel, N., McLaren, B.M., Koedinger, K.R.: The student becomes the master: Integrating peer tutoring with cognitive tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 751–753. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2007)Google Scholar
- 19.Westermann, K., Rummel, N.: Delaying Instruction – Evidence from a Study in a University Relearning Setting. Instructional Science 40(4), 673–689 (2012), doi:0.1007/s11251-012-9207-8Google Scholar