Clustering Constructed Responses for Formative Assessment in Comprehension SEEDING

  • Frank Paiva
  • Rodney D. Nielsen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8474)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the Comprehension SEEDING system and how it enhances the classroom discussion. SEEDING attempts to accomplish this by providing real-time formative assessment of student responses. Teachers can pose questions using the SEEDING system, students submit typed responses, and the system automatically groups the responses according to their semantic similarity. These components equip teachers with the necessary tools to engage the classroom in a broad and enhanced discussion.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bunce, D.M., VandenPlas, J.R., Havanki, K.: Comparing the effectiveness of student achievement of a student response system versus online WebCT quizzes. Journal of Chemisty Education 83(3), 488–493 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carnaghan, C., Webb, A.: Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Student Satisfaction, Learning, and Engagement in Accounting Education. Issues in Accounting Education 22(3), 391–409 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chi, M.T.H.: Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(1), 73–105 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duggan, P.M., Palmer, E., Devitt, P.: Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: A randomised trial. BMC Medical Education 7(25) (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duncan, D.: Clickers: A New Teaching Aid with Exceptional Promise. Astronomy Education Review 5(1), 70 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keller, C., Finkelstein, N., Perkins, K., Pollock, S., Turpen, C., Dubson, M., Hsu, L., et al.: Research-based Practices For Effective Clicker Use. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 128–131 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larson, B.: Classroom discussion: a method of instruction and a curriculum outcome. Teaching and Teacher Education 16(5-6), 661–677 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nielsen, R., Ward, W., Martin, J., Palmer, M.: Extracting a Representation from Text for Semantic Analysis. In: Proc. ACL-HLT (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Penuel, W.R., Boscardin, C.K., Masyn, K., Crawford, V.M.: Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Educational Technology Research and Development 55(4), 315–346 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siau, K., Nah, F.F., Siau, K., Sheng, H., Nah, F.F.: Use of a Classroom Response System to Enhance Classroom Interactivity Use of a Classroom Response System to Enhance Classroom Interactivity (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Paiva
    • 1
  • Rodney D. Nielsen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North TexasUSA

Personalised recommendations