Advertisement

SubRosa: Supporting a Proper Learning Atmosphere through Subtle Cues with Immediate Feedback

  • Paweł Woźniak
  • Bartosz Koczorowicz
  • Morten Fjeld
  • Andrzej Romanowski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8462)

Abstract

SubRosa is a persuasive ambient display system designed to reduce sound levels in areas used for quiet study. We have constructed a high-fidelity prototype that visualises ambient noise levels, in this case as a rotting tomato. SubRosa is different from similar systems in that it uses immediate feedback and targets a dynamic user group with a high member turnover. An experience study we conducted in two different locations showed positive influence on ambient noise conditions. Based on the study results, we discuss insights into the design of persuasive ambient displays, the effectiveness of our approach, and types of ambient feedback that could be used in similar systems. By comparing the experience study results, we show how immediate feedback for ambient displays is suitable for environments with dynamic user groups.

Keywords

persuasive technology ambient display behavioural change ubiquitous computing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kjellberg, A., Landström, U., Tesarz, M., Söderberg, L., Akerlund, E.: The effects of nonphysical noise characteristics, ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work. J. Environ. Psychol. 16, 123–136 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stone, N.J.: Designing effective study environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21, 179–190 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weiser, M., Brown, J.S.: Beyond calculation, pp. 75–85. Copernicus (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gustafsson, A., Gyllenswärd, M.: The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. In: CHI EA 2005, pp. 1423–1426. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nakajima, T., Lehdonvirta, V., Tokunaga, E., Kimura, H.: Reflecting human behavior to motivate desirable lifestyle. In: Proc. DIS 2008, pp. 405–414. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, T., Hong, H., Magerko, B.: Design requirements for ambient display that supports sustainable lifestyle. In: Proc. DIS 2010, pp. 103–112. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakajima, T., Lehdonvirta, V.: Designing motivation using persuasive ambient mirrors. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17, 107–126 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fortmann, J., Stratmann, T.C., Boll, S., Poppinga, B., Heuten, W.: Make me move at work! an ambient light display to increase physical activity. In: Proceedings of PervasiveHealth 2013, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 274–277. ICST (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rogers, Y., Hazlewood, W.R., Marshall, P., Dalton, N., Hertrich, S.: Ambient influence: can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change? In: Proc. Ubicomp 2010, pp. 261–270. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brewer, J., Williams, A., Dourish, P.: A handle on what’s going on: Combining tangible interfaces and ambient displays for collaborative groups. In: Proceedings of TEI 2007, pp. 3–10. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wisneski, C., Ishii, H., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Brave, S., Ullmer, B., Yarin, P.: Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In: Yuan, F., Konomi, S., Burkhardt, H.-J. (eds.) CoBuild 1998. LNCS, vol. 1370, pp. 22–32. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Occhialini, V., van Essen, H., Eggen, B.: Design and evaluation of an ambient display to support time management during meetings. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6947, pp. 263–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ham, J., Midden, C., Maan, S., Merkus, B.: Persuasive lighting: the influence of feedback through lighting on energy conservation behavior. In: Proceedings of Experiencing Light 2009 International Conference on the Effects of Light on Wellbeing, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, October 26-27, pp. 122–128. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt, A., Pfleging, B., Alt, F., Sahami, A., Fitzpatrick, G.: Interacting with 21st-century computers. IEEE Pervasive Computing 11, 22–31 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Memarovic, N., Langheinrich, M., Alt, F., Elhart, I., Hosio, S., Rubegni, E.: Using public displays to stimulate passive engagement, active engagement, and discovery in public spaces. In: Proceedings of MAB 2012, pp. 55–64. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Claes, S., Vande Moere, A.: Street infographics: raising awareness of local issues through a situated urban visualization. In: Proceedings of PerDis 2013, pp. 133–138. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Valkanova, N., Jorda, S., Tomitsch, M., Vande Moere, A.: Reveal-it!: the impact of a social visualization projection on public awareness and discourse. In: Proceedings of CHI 2013, pp. 3461–3470. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gaver, W.W., Beaver, J., Benford, S.: Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: Proceedings of CHI 2003, pp. 233–240. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woźniak, P., Romanowski, A.: Everyday problems vs. ubicomp: a case study. In: Proceedings of WIMS 2012, pp. 57:1–57:4. ACM (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paweł Woźniak
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bartosz Koczorowicz
    • 2
  • Morten Fjeld
    • 1
  • Andrzej Romanowski
    • 2
  1. 1.t2i Interaction Lab, Department of Applied ITChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Institute of Applied Computer ScienceLodz University of TechnologyLodzPoland

Personalised recommendations