Using Social Influence for Motivating Customers to Generate and Share Feedback

  • Agnis Stibe
  • Harri Oinas-Kukkonen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8462)

Abstract

A combination of high tech environments and social influence concepts holds great potential to positively effect behaviors and attitudes of individuals. Drawing upon socio-psychological theories, this study explores how social influence design principles change customer engagement in sharing feedback. For that purpose, an information system consisting of social influence design principles was implemented on situated displays and examined with 77 Twitter users. The results reveal interplay between the design principles and their capacity to explain 52% of the variance in perceived persuasiveness of the system, which can further predict 40% of the variance in behavioral intention of participants to provide feedback through the system in the future. The findings could be instrumental in progress towards a richer understanding of how to further harness social influence for customer engagement through socio-technical environments and how it effects the development of novel persuasive systems.

Keywords

Customer engagement social influence persuasive systems design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ajzen, I.: The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alt, F., Shirazi, A.S., Kubitza, T., Schmidt, A.: Interaction Techniques for Creating and Exchanging Content with Public Displays. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1709–1718. ACM (April 2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatterjee, S., Price, A.: Healthy Living with Persuasive Technologies: Framework, Issues, and Challenges. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16(2), 171–178 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., Reno, R.R.: A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24(20), 1–243 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crano, W.D., Prislin, R.: Attitudes and Persuasion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 345–374 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deutsch, M., Gerard, H.B.: A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51(3), 629 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U.: Social Norms and Human Cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(4), 185–190 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Festinger, L.: A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations 7(2), 117–140 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19(2), 139–152 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang, E.M., Koster, A., Borchers, J.: Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? In: Indulska, J., Patterson, D.J., Rodden, T., Ott, M. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5013, pp. 228–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kock, N.: WarpPLS 4.0 User Manual. ScriptWarp Systems, Laredo, TX (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Langrial, S., Lehto, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M., Karppinen, P.: Native Mobile Applications for Personal Well-being: A Persuasive Systems Design Evaluation. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), p. 93 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lehto, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Drozd, F.: Factors Affecting Perceived Persuasiveness of a Behavior Change Support System. In: ICIS Proceedings, Orlando, Florida (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.: Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. In: Snow, R.E., Farr, M.J. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: III. Conative and Affective Process Analyses, pp. 223–253. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mangold, W.G., Faulds, D.J.: Social Media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix. Business Horizons 52(4), 357–365 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mathew, A.P.: Using the Environment as an Interactive Interface to Motivate Positive Behavior Change in a Subway Station. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1637–1640. ACM (April 2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    May, M.A., Doob, L.W.: Cooperation and Competition. Social Science Research Council Bulletin 125 (1937)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mead, M.: Cooperation and Competition among Primitive Peoples. McGraw-Hill, New York (1937)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Müller, J., Alt, F., Michelis, D., Schmidt, A.: Requirements and Design Space for Interactive Public Displays. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1285–1294. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive Systems Design: Key issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24(1), 28 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Humanizing the Web: Change and Social Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K., Frow, P.: Managing the Co-creation of Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(1), 83–96 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rafaeli, S., Ariel, Y.: Online Motivational Factors: Incentives for Participation and Contribution in Wikipedia (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rashotte, L.: Social Influence. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology 9, 562–563 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rottiers, S.: The Sociology of Social Recognition: Competition in Social Recognition Games (No. 1004) (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schoenau-Fog, H.: Teaching Serious Issues through Player Engagement in an Interactive Experiential Learning Scenario. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture 6(1), 53–70 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stibe, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Bērziņa, I., Pahnila, S.: Incremental Persuasion Through Microblogging: A Survey of Twitter Users in Latvia. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Persuasive Technology: Persuasive Technology and Design: Enhancing Sustainability and Health, p. 8. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stibe, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Lehto, T.: Exploring Social Influence on Customer Engagement: A Pilot Study on the Effects of Social Learning, Social Comparison, and Normative Influence. In: 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2735–2744. IEEE Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vassileva, J.: Motivating Participation in Social Computing Applications: A User Modeling Perspective. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22(1-2), 177–201 (2012)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilson, S.R., Benner, L.A.: The Effects of Self-Esteem and Situation upon Comparison Choices During Ability Evaluation. Sociometry, 381–397 (1971)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wood, J.V.: What is Social Comparison and How Should We Study It? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(5), 520–537 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zajonc, R.B.: Social Facilitation. Science 149, 269–274 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agnis Stibe
    • 1
  • Harri Oinas-Kukkonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Oulu Advanced Research on Software and Information Systems,Department of Information Processing ScienceUniversity of OuluFinland

Personalised recommendations