Advertisement

Investigating the Influence of Social Exclusion on Persuasion by a Virtual Agent

  • Peter A. M. Ruijten
  • Jaap Ham
  • Cees J. H. Midden
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8462)

Abstract

Persuasive agents may function as a tool to induce changes in human behavior. Research has shown that human-likeness of such agents influences their effectiveness. Besides characteristics of the agent, other characteristics may also have strong influences on persuasive agents’ effectiveness. One such characteristic is social exclusion. When people feel socially excluded, they are more sensitive to social influence. In two studies, we investigated this effect in a human-agent interaction. Results show stronger behavior changes for socially exclusion compared to social inclusion. This effect seems stronger for females than for males.

Keywords

Social exclusion Social influence Virtual agent 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ham, J., Midden, C.: A persuasive robotic agent to save energy: The influence of social feedback, feedback valence and task similarity on energy conservation behavior. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6414, pp. 335–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3), 143–166 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qiu, L., Benbasat, I.: Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: a social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(4), 145–182 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi, Y.K., Miracle, G.E., Biocca, F.: The effects of anthropomorphic agents on advertising effectiveness and the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising 2(1) (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114(4), 864 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: Creating Social Connection Through Inferential Reproduction Loneliness and Perceived Agency in Gadgets, Gods, and Greyhounds. Psychological Science 19(2), 114–120 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., Epley, N.: Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(3), 219–232 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eyssel, F., Reich, N.: Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots)? On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of 8th ACM/IEEE Conference on Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 121–122. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jung, Y., Lee, K.M.: Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. In: Proceedings of PRESENCE, pp. 80–87 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams, K.D., Jarvis, B.: Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods 38(1), 174–180 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Beest, I., Williams, K.D.: When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(5), 918 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernstein, M.J., Claypool, H.M.: Social exclusion and pain sensitivity why exclusion sometimes hurts and sometimes numbs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(2), 185–196 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zadro, L., Williams, K.D., Richardson, R.: How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40(4), 560–567 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Midden, C., Ham, J.: The persuasive effects of positive and negative social feedback from an embodied agent on energy conservation behavior. In: Proceedings of the AISB 2008 Symposium on Persuasive Technology, pp. 9–13. AISB (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bartneck, C., Croft, E., Kulic, D.: Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. In: Metrics for HRI Workshop, Technical Report, pp. 37–44. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Powers, A., Kiesler, S.: The advisor robot: tracing people’s mental model from a robot’s physical attributes. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 218–225. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3), 497 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guadagno, R.E., Blascovich, J., Bailenson, J.N., Mccall, C.: Virtual humans and persuasion: The effects of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychology 10(1), 1–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eagly, A.H., Carli, L.L.: Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: a meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin 90(1), 1–20 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eagly, A.H.: Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin 85(1), 86 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ruijten, P.A.M., Bouten, D.H.L., Rouschop, D.C.J., Ham, J., Midden, C.J.H.: The Development of a Rasch-Type Anthropomorphism Scale (2013) (under review)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wood, W.: Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology 51(1), 539–570 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Midden, C.J.H., Ham, J.: Persuasive Technology to promote pro-environmental behaviour. In: Steg, L., van den Berg, A.E., de Groot, J.I.M. (eds.) Environmental Psychology an Introduction, pp. 243–254. BPS Blackwell, West-Sussex (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter A. M. Ruijten
    • 1
  • Jaap Ham
    • 1
  • Cees J. H. Midden
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Innovation SciencesEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations