A Case Study with an Attractive BEC: Comparison of Lattice Model, Gross–Pitaevskii, and MCTDHB Predictions on a Tunneling Process
- 412 Downloads
This chapter compares the exact MCTDHB predictions to solutions of the Schrödinger equation with the Bose–Hubbard Hamiltonian computed with the time-evolved block decimation and the mean-field discrete non-linear Schrödinger equation for a tunneling setup. It is found that the discrete model Hamiltonians either make qualitatively unreliable predictions for the many-body physics when mapped to the continuous space setup or that there is no continuous space equivalent of the lattice predictions. In conclusion, exact and self-consistent continuous space many-body methods such as MCTDHB are crucial for the proper description of tunneling to open space problems.
KeywordsContinuous Space Lattice Potential Tunneling Process Escape Time Wannier Function
- 1.J.A. Glick, L.D. Carr, Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling of Solitons in Bose–Einstein Condensates. ArXiv e-prints (May 2011). ArXiv:1105.5164
- 3.R. Hanbury Brown, R.Q. Twiss, A Test of a New Type of Stellar Interferometer on Sirius. Nature 178(1046), 1956 (1048)Google Scholar
- 4.R. Hanbury Brown, R.Q. Twiss, Interferometry of the Intensity Fluctuations in Light. I. Basic Theory: The Correlation between Photons in Coherent Beams of Radiation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 242(1230), 300324 (1957)Google Scholar
- 5.R. Hanbury Brown, R.Q. Twiss, Interferometry of the Intensity Fluctuations in Light. II. An Experimental Test of the Theory for Partially Coherent Light. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 243(1234), 291319 (1958)Google Scholar