Numerical Detection of Inactive Joints

Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 22)


Inactive joints are the joints that cannot perform relative motion due to structural limitations in a mechanism. They are usually introduced in order to eliminate redundant constraints. A joint can be inactive in the whole range of the mechanism motion or only in selected configurations. A numerical method of detection of inactive joints is presented. The method is based on multibody system approach and utilizes the constraint Jacobian matrix. The ability to perform relative motion is investigated and inactivity of joints in both regular and singular configurations is discussed. A numerical example is provided.


Inactive joints Redundant constraints Jacobian matrix 


  1. 1.
    Blanding, D.L.: Exact Constraint Machine Design Using Kinematic Principles. ASME Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brouwer, D.M., Boer, S.E., Meijaard, J.P., Aarts, R.G.K.M.: Optimization of release locations for small self-stress large stiffness flexure mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory 64, 230–250 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olędzki, A.: Basics of Theory of Machines and Mechanisms (in Polish). WNT, Warsaw (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morecki, A., Oderfeld, J.: Theory of Machines and Mechanisms (in Polish). PWN, Warsaw (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    García de Jalon, J., Gutiérrez-López, M.D.: Multibody dynamics with redundant constraints and singular mass matrix: existence, uniqueness, and determination of solutions for accelerations and constraint forces. Multibody Sys. Dyn. 30, 311–341 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11044-013-9358-7 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Song, S.M., Gao, X.: The mobility equation and the solvability of joint forces/torques in dynamic analysis. ASME J. Mech. Des. 114, 257–262 (1992). doi:10.1115/1.2916940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wojtyra, M.: Joint reaction forces in multibody systems with redundant constraints. Multibody Sys. Dyn. 14, 23–46 (2005). doi:10.1007/s11044-005-5967-0 CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wojtyra, M.: Joint reactions in rigid body mechanisms with dependent constraints. Mech. Mach. Theory 44, 2265–2278 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.07.008 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wojtyra, M., Frączek, J.: Comparison of selected methods of handling redundant constraints in multibody systems simulations. ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 8, 021007-1–021007-9 (2013). doi:10.1115/1.4006958 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frączek, J., Wojtyra, M.: On the unique solvability of a direct dynamics problem for mechanisms with redundant constraints and Coulomb friction in joints. Mech. Mach. Theory 46, 312–334 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.11.003 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reshetov, L.N.: Designing of Rational Mechanisms, 2nd edn. Mechanical Engineering, Moscow (1972)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gogu, G.: Structural Synthesis of Parallel Robots. Part 4: Other Topologies with Two and Three Degrees of Freedom. Springer, Netherlands (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kong, X., Gosselin, C.M.: Type synthesis of three-degree-of-freedom spherical parallel manipulators. Int. J. Robot. Res. 23, 237–245 (2004). doi:10.1177/0278364904041562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kong, X., Gosselin, C.M.: Type synthesis of 4-DOF SP-equivalent parallel manipulators: a virtual chain approach. Mech. Mach. Theory 41, 1306–1319 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.01.004 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Majou, F., Gosselin, C.M., Wenger, P., Chablat, D.: Parametric stiffness analysis of the orthoglide. Mech. Mach. Theory 42, 296–311 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.03.018 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haug, E.J.: Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan, H.S., Wu, L.I.: The stationary configurations of planar six-bar kinematic chains. Mech. Mach. Theory 23, 287–293 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nikravesh, P.E.: Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Aeronautics and Applied MechanicsWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations