Considering Cultural Issues of ERP System Utilization: A Company-Based Perspective

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 8)

Abstract

Some data show that the effect of investment in Enterprise Information System (EIS) is not high enough in Japan compared with the levels in the United States and other Western countries. Moreover, Japan is facing major changes in the business and IT environments. With global business expansion, improving operational efficiency at the global level using information technology (IT) has become one of the most important issues for companies. The Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) packaged system, or ERP system is one of the options used for re-engineering global information systems in many countries. In this paper, the authors present results concerning the effect of implementation of ERP system. The analyses focused on the context of the global expansion of companies and the effects of customization of packaged software functions. Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) issues when implementing ERP systems are also discussed in this paper, regarding cultural issues specific to Japanese companies.

Keywords

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system Enterprise information system (EIS) Business process re-engineering (BPR) Management style Cultural issues 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research in Japan (24530425). We would thank Impress Japan and ERP Forum Japan for permission to use their variable data.

References

  1. 1.
    ERP Forum (2013). 2013 ERP no Saishin Doukou (The Latest Trend of ERP, in Japanese), Impress Business Media.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cusumano, M. A. (2004). The business of software: What every manager, programmer, and entrepreneur must know to thrive and survive in good times and bad. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Motohashi, K. (2010). IT to Seisansei ni kansuru jisshou bunseki (Anallysis on relationship between IT and Productivity, in Japanse), Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iizuka, K., & Tsuda, K. (2006). Strategy for software business—from the perspective of customers’ value recognition (in Japanese), Annual Journal, Information Science Laboratory 2006, Senshu University, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taguchi, Y., Ito, H., Mori, S., & Ishikura, E. (Eds.). (2011). 2013 ERP no Saishin Doukou (The Latest trend of ERP Market 2011 in Japanese), Impress Business Media.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iizuka, K., Okawada, T., Tsubone, M., Iizuka, Y., & Suematsu, C. (2013). Issues about inter-organizational process flow adjustment in business process modeling, enterprise and organizational modeling and simulation, Selected papers (Vol. 53, pp. 24–41). Heidelberg: LNBIP Springer.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Re-engineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper business.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1995). The implementation of business process re-engineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 109–144.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Earl, M. J., Sampler, J. L., & Short, J. E. (1995). Strategies for business process re-engineering: Evidence from field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 31–56.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Attaran, M. (2004). exploring the relationship between information technology and business process re-engineering. Information and Management, 41(5), 585–596.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kadono, Y., & Tsubaki, H. (2006). Development of IT management effectiveness and analysis. Journal of the Japan Society for Management Information, 14(4), 69–83.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chikara, T., & Takahashi, T. (1997). Research on measuring the customer satisfaction for information systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 33(3–4), 639–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holland, C. P., & Light, B. (1999). A critical success factors model for erp implementation, Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), pp. 273–297.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y.-K. (2002). The critical Success factors for ERP implementation: An organizational fit perspective. Information & Management, 40(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yazgana, H. R., Borana, S., & Goztepeb, K. (2009). An ERP software selection process with using artificial neural network based on analytic network process approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 9214–9222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stefanoul, C. J. (2000). The selection process of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, American Conference of Information System (AMCIS).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peslak, A. R. (2005). A twelve-step multiple course approach to teaching enterprise resource planning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(2), 147–155.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jensen, T. N., Fink, J., Møller, C., Rikhardsson, P., & Kræmmergaard, P. (2005). Issues in ERP education development—evaluation of the options using three different models, 2nd International Conference on Enterprise Systems and Accounting (ICESAcc’05), pp.162–180.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takei, Y., Okuda, I., & Iizuka, K. (2013). CSF of ERP system implementation: Findings from literature survey, IPSJ SIG Technical Reports, 2013-IS-126(5), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schniederjans, D., & Yadav, S. (2013). Successful ERP implementation: an integrative model. Business Process Management Journal, 19(2), 364–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shah, S. H., Bokhari, R. H., Hassan, S., Shah, M., & Ali, M. (2011). Socio-technical factors affecting ERP implementation success in Pakistan: An empirical study. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(3), 742–749.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, L., Lee, M. K. O., Zhang, Z., & Banerjee, P. (2003). Critical success factors of enterprise resource planning systems implementation success in China, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 8(8), pp. (236)1–(236)10.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Finney, S., & Corbett, M. (2007). ERP implementation: A compilation and analysis of critical success factors. Business Process Management Journal, 13(3), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wickramasinghe, V., & Gunawardena, V. (2010). Critical elements that discriminate between successful and unsuccessful ERP implementations in Sri Lanka. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23(4), 466–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dezdar, S., & Ainin, S. (2011). Examining ERP implementation success from a project environment perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 17(6), 919–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nikkei Inc. (Nikkei Shimbumsha) (Eds.). (2009). 200 Nen Kigyo (Firms of 200 Years History, in Japanese).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Higano, T. (2009). IT ni Yoru Work Wtyle Henkaku (work style innovation, in Japanese). IT Solution Frontier, 11, 16–19.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). (2010). IT Keieiryoku Sihyo wo Mochiita IT no Rikatuyou ni Kansuru Genjou Chousa (Current status survey on IT utilization stage evaluated by IT managerial capability index, in Japanese).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nishi, K., Irei, T., & Shimura, K. (1993). Japanese quality management—Management quality statistics. Japan: Chuo Keizaisha, Inc. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iizuka, K., Okawada, T., Tsubone, M., & Iizuka, Y. (2013). Study on business process modeling methods: From the viewpoint of inter-organizational process flow adjustment, 2013 International Symposium on Business and Management (ISBM 2013), pp. 906–915.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Iizuka, K., Okawada, T., Tsubone, M., Iizuka, Y., & Suematsu, C. (2013). Issues about inter-organizational process flow adjustment in business process modeling, enterprise and organizational modeling and simulation (Vol. 53, pp. 24–41). Heidelberg: LNBIP Springer.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Okui, N. (2005). Nihongata Management no Shoraizo – Gijutu Hencho ga Seisansei wo Sogai, Kaizen no Gokui wo Seizogho ni Manabe (Future Vision of Japanese Style Management: Should Systems Developers Learn Kaizen from Manufacturers in order to Avoid Technoid Waning Productivity, in Japanse), Nikkei IT Professional May-2005, p. 114.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Takeda, Y. (1997). Inside the Kaisha: Demystifying Japanese business behavior. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(2), 184–190.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Iizuka, K., Iizuka, Y., & Tsuda, K. (2010). Analysis of effective approach for business process re-engineering—from the perspective of organizational factors, 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS2010), pp. 384–389.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kayo Iizuka
    • 1
  • Yoshitaka Taguchi
    • 2
  • Chihiro Suematsu
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Network and InformationSenshu UniversityKanagawaJapan
  2. 2.ERP Forum JapanTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of ManagementKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations