Positive Impacts of Private Smartphone Experience on Satisfaction with Business Applications: A Counter-Evidence

  • Corinna Fohrholz
  • Christian Lambeck
  • Norbert Gronau
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 8)

Abstract

The high dissemination of smartphones in our everyday life has also influenced the use of business applications such as Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. In particular, the intuitive interaction of mobile devices and their innovative visualization concepts allow for a high joy-of-use. Whereas mobile business applications are already present today, the impact of private Smartphone usage on the user assessment of business applications, such as ERP, is rarely discussed. This paper addresses this research question by investigating the impact of private Smartphone usage on ERP user satisfaction. The authors hypothesize that users with lot of experience in mobile usage are also evaluating their ERP system more critical, as they also expect to have these intuitive interaction concepts in their business environment. The findings presented in this paper are based on a survey with 184 participants from small and medium-sized enterprises in Germany.

Keywords

ERP Mobile device Usability User satisfaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, July/August, 121–133.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shang, S., & Seddon, P. (2002). Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager’s perspective. Informations Systems Journal, 12, 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO 9241-11. (2000). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Topi, H., Lucas, W. T., & Babian, T. (2005). Identifying usability issues with an ERP implementation. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 128–133.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh, A., & Wesson, J. (2009). Evaluation criteria for assessing the usability of ERP systems. SAICSIT ‘09 Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, pp. 87–95.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41(6), 731–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weiß, F., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Consumerization. IT innovations from the consumer market as a challenge for corporate IT. Business & Information Systems Engineering., 6(4), 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gafni, R. (2009). Usability issues in mobile-wireless information systems. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6, 755–769.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Terrenghi, L., Kronen, M., & Valle, C. (2005). Usability requirements for mobile service scenarios. Proceeding of HCI International Conference, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seymour, L., Makanya, W., & Berrangé, S. (2007). End-users’ acceptance of enterprise resource planning systems. An Investigation of Antecedents. Proceedings of the 6th Annual ISOnEworld Conference.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Calisir, F., & Calisir, F. (2004). The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramayah, T., & Lo, M. C. (2007). Impact of shared beliefs on “perceived usefulness” and “ease of use” in the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system. Management Research News, 30(6), 420–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pliskin, N. (2005). Measuring user satisfaction and perceived usefulness in the ERP context. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), 43–52.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozen, C., & Basoglu, N. (2006). Impact of man-machine interaction factors on enterprise resource planning (ERP) software design. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, pp. 2335–2341.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parks, N. (2012). Testing & quantifying ERP usability. Proceeding RIIT ‘12 Proceedings of the 1stAnnual conference on Research in information technology, pp. 31–36.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scholtz, B., Cilliers, C., & Calitz, A. (2010). Qualitative techniques for evaluating enterprise resource planning (ERP) user interfaces. SAICSIT ‘10 Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, pp. 284–293.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Topi, H., Lucas, W. T., & Babian, T. (2005). Identifying usability issues with an ERP implementation. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 128–135.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lau, J. (2006). The state of European enterprise mobility in 2006. Forrester Research.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dospinescu, O., Fotache, D., Munteanu, A. B., & Hurbean, L. (2008). Mobile enterprise resource planning: New technology horizons. Communications of the IBIMA, 1, 91–97.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nah, F. H., Siau, K., & Sheng, H. (2005). The value of mobile applications: A utility company study. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gebauer, J. (2008). User requirements of mobile technology: A summary of research results. In: R. Basole (Ed.), Enterprise Mobility: Applications, Technologies and Strategies (pp. 101–120). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simonitsch, K. (2003). Mobile business—Geschäftsmodelle und Kooperationen. Köln: EUL Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, D., & Adipat, B. (2005). Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 18(3), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: Literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wesson, J. L., Singh, A., & van Tonder, B. (2010). Can adaptive interfaces improve the usability of mobile applications? In: P. Forbrig, F. Paternó & A. M. Pejtersen (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 187–198). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burke, J., Gebauer, J., & Shaw, M. (2009). The efficacy of mobile computing for enterprise applications. In: A. Domavicius & A. Gupta (eds.), Business Computing: Handbook in Information Systems (Vol. 3, pp. 347–372). Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krogstie, J. (2003). Mobile information systems—research challenges on the conceptual and logical level. In: O. Antoni, Y. Masatoshi & E. Yu (Eds.), Advanced conceptual modeling techniques, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 2784, pp. 124–135). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith, A. (2011). Issues in adapting usability testing for global usability. In: I. Douglas & Z. Liu (Eds.), Global Usability (pp. 23–38). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parush, A., Hod, A., & Shtub, A. (2007). Impact of visualization type and contextual factors on performance with enterprise resource planning systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52(1), 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bishu, R. R., Kleiner, B. M., & Drury, C. G. (2001). Ergonomic concerns in enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and its implementations. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Design of Information Infrastructure Systems for Manufacturing: Global Engineering, Manufacturing and Enterprise Networks, Deventer, The Netherlands, pp. 146–155.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hess, S., & Jung, J. (2012). Does the ipad add value to business environments. CHI EA 12 Extended Absracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 335–350.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loh, C. C., Stadlen, A. D., Basole, R. C., Moses, J. D., & Tuohy, C. (2008). Enterprise mobility and support outsourcing: A research model and initial findings. In: R. Basole (Ed.), Enterprise mobility: Applications, Technologies and Strategies (pp. 183–209). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wiredu, G. O. (2007). User appropriation of mobile technologies: Motives conditions, and design properties. Information and Organization, 17, 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Holtsnider, B., & Jaffe, B. (2012). IT manager’s handbook (3rd ed.). Burlington: Kaufman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corinna Fohrholz
    • 1
  • Christian Lambeck
    • 2
  • Norbert Gronau
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Business Information Systems and Electronic GovernmentUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations