Advertisement

Digital Information Asset Evaluation: Characteristics and Dimensions

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 7)

Abstract

Information growth makes the understanding of the value of digital information assets a key issue to information systems management. To this end, the paper discusses the results of the reconstruction of a multidisciplinary literature, addressing information value or some of the related concepts or drivers. The analysis allows identifying characteristics and dimensions relevant to digital information asset evaluation. In particular, information capacity results as a core characteristic of information value, encompassing information quality, information structure, information infrastructure, and information diffusion.

Keywords

Information value Digital information asset Information capacity Information quality Information utility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper has been partially supported by the FutureEnterprise FP7 Project Grant agreement no: 611948 for Coordination and Support action, and by the Italian PON project PON01_00861 SMART (Services and Meta-services for SMART eGovernment).

References

  1. 1.
    The Economist: Data, data everywhere (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pospiech, M., Felden, C.: Big data: a state-of-the-art. AMCIS 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E.: Big data: the management revolution. Harv. Bus. Rev. 90(10), 61–68 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kallinikos, J.: Governing Through Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kallinikos, J.: The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yokota, F., Thompson, K.M.: Value of information literature analysis: a review of applications in health risk management. Med. Decis. Mak. Int. J. Soc Med. Decis. Mak. 24, 287–298 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Claxton, K., Neumann, P.J., Araki, S., Weinstein, M.C.: Bayesian value-of-information analysis: an application to a policy model of Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 17, 38–55 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Claxton, K.P., Sculpher, M.J.: Using value of information analysis to prioritise health research: some lessons from recent UK experience. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 1055–1068 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarvary, M.: Gurus and Oracles: the Marketing of Information. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shapiro, C., Varian, H.R.: Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petter, S., DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 236–263 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moody, D., Walsh, P.: Measuring the value of information: an asset valuation approach. ECIS 1999 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arrow, K.J.: The economics of information: an exposition. Empirica 23, 119–128 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blackwell, D.: Equivalent comparison of experiments. Ann. Math. Stat. 24, 265–272 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gilboa, I., Lehrer, E.: The value of information: an axiomatic approach. J. Math. Econ. 20, 443–459 (1991)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keisler, J., Collier, Z., Chu, E., Sinatra, N., Linkov, I.: Value of information analysis: the state of application. Environ. Syst. Decis. 34, 1–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Glazer, R.: Measuring the value of information: the information-intensive organization. IBM Syst. J. 32, 99–110 (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Melville, N., Kraemer, K., Gurbaxani, V.: Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q. 28, 283–322 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Willcocks, L.P., Lester, S.: Beyond the IT productivity paradox. Wiley, Chichester (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brynjolfsson, E., Yang, S.: Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature. Adv. Comput. 43, 179–214 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hitt, L.M., Brynjolfsson, E.: Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Q. 20, 121 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K.L.: Information technology and economic performance : a critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surv. 35, 1–28 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blanton, J.E., Watson, H.J., Moody, J.: Toward a better understanding of information technology organization: a comparative case-study. MISQ Q. 16, 531–555 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boisot, M.: Knowledge assets: securing competitive advantage in the information economy. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boisot, M.: Information space: a framework for learning in organizations, institutions, and culture. Routledge, London (1995)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sajko, M., Rabuzin, K., Bača, M.: How to calculate information value for effective security risk assessment. J. Inf. Organ. Sci. 30, 263–278 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zheng, Y.: Different spaces for e-development: what can we learn from the capability approach? Inf. Technol. Dev. 15, 66–82 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahituv, N.: Assessing the value of information: problems and approaches. In: DeGross, J.I., Henderson, J.C., Konsynski, B.R. (eds.) International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 1989). pp. 315–325. Boston, Massachusetts (1989)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ahituv, N.: A systematic approach towards assessing the value of an information system. MIS Q. 4, 61–75 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ciborra, C., Braa, K., Cordella, A., Dahlbom, B., Failla, A., Hanseth, O., Hepso, V., Ljungberg, J., Monteiro, E., Simon, K.A.: From Control to Drift: the Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Remenyi, D., Money, A., Sherwood-Smith, M., Irani, Z.: The Effective Measurement and Management of IT Costs and Benefits. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., Hanseth, O., Williams, R.: From artefacts to infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bernstein, P.A., Haas, L.M.: Information integration in the enterprise. Commun. ACM 51, 72 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Markus, M.L., Tanis, C., van Fenema, P.C.: Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations. Commun. ACM 43, 42–46 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Simpson, C.W., Prusak, L.: Troubles with information overload—moving from quantity to quality in information provision. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 15, 413–425 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Skyrme, D.: Ten ways to add value to your business. Manag. Inf. 1, 20–25 (1994)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Boisot, M., Li, Y.: Organizational versus market knowledge: from concrete embodiment to abstract representation. J. Bioeconomics. 8, 219–251 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cordella, A., Bonina, C.M.: A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: a theoretical reflection. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 512–520 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Harrison, T.M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G.B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., Hrdinova, J., Pardo, T., Hrdinová, J.: Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, pp. 83–97. ACM, College Park, MD, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wijnhoven, F.: The Hegelian inquiring system and a critical triangulation tool for the Internet information slave: a design science study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 1168–1182 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 12, 5–33 (1996)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Madnick, S.E., Wang, R.Y., Lee, Y.W., Zhu, H.: Overview and framework for data and information quality research. J. Data Inf. Qual. 1, 1–22 (2009)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fallis, D.: On verifying the accuracy of information: philosophical perspectives. Libr. Trends. 52, 463–487 (2004)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Eppler, M., Helfert, M.: A Framework for the Classification of Data Quality Costs and an Analysis of Their Progression. IQ 2004, pp. 311–325., MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rieh, S.Y., Danielson, D.R.: Credibility: a multidisciplinary framework. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 41, 307–364 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tallon, B.P.P., Scannell, R.: Information life cycle. Commun. ACM 50, 65–69 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Francalanci, C., Piuri, V.: Designing information technology architectures: a cost-oriented methodology. J. Inf. Technol. 14, 181–192 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ardagna, D., Francalanci, C., Piuri, V.: Designing and rightsizing the information system architecture. Inf. Syst. Front. 6, 229–245 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Miller, R.J., Yoannidis, Y., Ramakrishnan, R.: The use of information capacity in schema integration and translation. The 19th VLDB Conference, Dublin (1993)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., Maurino, A., Gianluigi, V.: A capacity and value based model for data architectures adopting integration technologies. AMCIS 2011 Proceedings (2011)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ahituv, N.: A systematic approach towards assessing the value of an information system. MIS Q. 4, 61–75 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., Hatling, M.: Developing information infrastructure: the tension between standardization and flexibility. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 21, 407–426 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7, 111–134 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hanseth, O., Lyytinen, K.: Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. J. Inf. Technol. 25, 1–19 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., Sambamurthy, V.: Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 120–131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nunamaker, J.J.F., Briggs, R.O.: Toward a broader vision for information systems. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2, 20 (2011)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Huang, K.T., Lee, Y., Wang, R.Y.: Quality, Information and Knowledge. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River (1999)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., Maurino, A.: Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput. Surv. 41, 16 (2009)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sen, A.: Rationality and Freedom. Harvard University, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hanseth, O.: The economics of standards. In: Ciborra, C.U., Braa, K., Cordella, A., Dahlbom, B., Failla, A., Hanseth, O. (eds.) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, pp. 56–70. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, XIII–XXIII (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EPFL-CDM-CSILausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Università degli Studi di Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations