Advertisement

The Role of IT in Organizational Networks, Individual Networks, and in Bridging These Two Levels

  • Andrea Carugati
  • Lapo Mola
  • Antonio Giangreco
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 7)

Abstract

In this paper, we seek to understand the role of technology at the nexus between the two network levels: as outcome of the decision process at the organizational level and as object of use and performance at the individual level. We aim to capture the role of IT in bridging the individual practices in the context of the larger network system [22]. To do so, we draw on a longitudinal case study of the development and diffusion of a software for the operation and management of nursing homes.

Keywords

Social networks Nursing home Organizational impacts of IS 

References

  1. 1.
    Grabski, S.V., Leech, S.A., Lu, B.: Enterprise system implementation risks and controls. In: Seddon, P.B., Willcocks, L., Shanks, G. (eds.) Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness, pp. 1–19, Cambridge University Press, Cmabridge (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caporarello, L., Viachka, A.: Individual readiness for change in the con-text of enterprise resource planning systems implementation. Paper presented at the 16th Americas conference on information systems 2010, AMCIS 2010, 2 827–2 836Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sumner, M.R.: How alignment strategies influence ERP project success. Enterp. Info. Syst. 3(4), 425–448 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wenrich, K.I., Ahmad, N.: Lessons learned during a decade of ERP experience: a case study. Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 5(1), 55–73 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suarez, F.F.: Network effects revisited: the role of strong ties in technology selection. Acad. Manag. J. 48(4), 710–720 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Powell, W.W., White, D.R., Koput, K.W., Owen-Smith, J.: Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Am. J. Sociol. 110(4), 1132–1205 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Currie, W.: Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory. Info. Technol. people 22(1), 63–77 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Northcraft, G.B., Polzer, J.T., Neale, M.A., Kramer, M.R.: Diversity, social identity and performance: emergent social dynamics in cross-functional teams. In: Jackson, S.E., Ruderman, M.N. (eds.) Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace, pp. 69–96. APA, Washington, D.C. (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Orlikowski, W.: Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3), 249–273 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rossignoli, C.: The contribution of transaction cost theory and other network-oriented techniques to digital markets. IseB 7(1), 57–79 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sasidharan, S., Santhanam, R., Brass, D.J., Sambamurthy, V.: The effects of social network structure on enterprise systems success: a longitudinal multilevel analysis. Info. Syst. Res. 23(3), 658–678 (2012). doi: 10.1287/isre.1110.0388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tichy, N.M.: Networks in organizations. In: Nystrom, P.C., Starbuck, W.H. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Design, pp. 225–249. Oxford University Press, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Depaoli, P., Za, S.: Towards the Redesign of e-business Maturity Models for SMEs. In: Baskerville, R., De Marco, M., Spagnoletti, P. (eds.) Designing Organizational Systems. Lecture Notes in Information System and Organization LNISO, vol. 1. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., Tsai, W.: Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 47(6), 795–817 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., Wenpin, T.: Zooming in and out: connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16(4), 359–371 (2005). doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Magni, M., Pennarola, F.: Stand by me: the quality of interorganizational relationships as antecedent of IT adoption. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, Information Systems in a Rapidly Changing Economy, ECIS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burt, R.S.: Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Granovetter, M.S.: Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91, 481–510 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uzzi, B.: The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61, 674–698 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burt, R.S.: The contingent value of social capital. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 339–365 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boissevain, J.: Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators and Coalitions. Basil Blackwell, London (1974)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Casalino, N., Buonocore, F., Rossignoli, C., Ricciardi, F.: Transparency, openness and knowledge sharing for rebuilding and strengthening government institutions (2013) IASTED Multiconferences—Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Web- Based Education, WBE 2013, pp. 866–871Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sorrentino, M.: Taking care of invisible technology. Eur. J. Info. Syst. 14, 507–509 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Magni, M., Provera, B., Proserpio, L.: Individual attitude toward improvisation in information systems development. Behav. Info. Technol. 29(3), 245–255 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burt, R.S.: Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In: Lin, N., Cook, K., Burt, R.S. (eds.) Social Capital: Theory and Research. Sociology and Economics: Controversy and Integration Series. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp 31–56 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levina, N., Vaast, E.: The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Q. 29(2), 335–363 (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carlile, P.R.: Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5), 555–568 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suchman, L.: Making a case: knowledge and routine work in document production. Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, pp. 29–45. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brynjolfsson, E., Kemerer, C.F.: Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Manag. Sci. 42(12), 1627–1647 (1996)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burt, R.S.: Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pontiggia, A., Virili, F.: Network effects in technology acceptance: laboratory evidence, (2008). ICIS 2008 Proceedings. Paper 130. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/130 (2008)
  33. 33.
    Cordella, A., Mola, L., Rossignoli, C.: Software market configuration: a socio-technical explanation. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 154 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tyre, M.J., Orlikowski, W.J.: Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 98–118 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Orlikowski, W., Hoffman, D.: An imporvisational model for change managment: the case of groupware technologies. Inventing the Organizations of the 21st Century, pp. 265–282. MIT, Boston (1997)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marzo F., Za S., Spagnoletti P.: Modeling Dependence Networks for Agent Based Simulation of Online and Offline Communities, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7879, Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moliterno T.P., Mahony D.M.: Network theory of organization: a multilevel approach. J. Manag. 2 (37), 443–467 (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Obstfeld, D.: Social networks, the Tertius Lungens orientation and involvement in innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 50(2005), 100–130 (2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Granovetter, M.: The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econ. Perspect. 19, 33–50 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Krackhardt, D., Hanson, J.R.: Informal networks: the company behind the chart. Harv. Bus. Rev. OnPoint, Spring 2011, 30–37 (2011)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    D’Urso, P., De Giovanni, L., Spagnoletti, P.: A fuzzy taxonomy for e-Health projects, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybernet. 4(6), xx, (2012). doi: 10.1007/s13042-012-0118-4

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and Social SciencesAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  3. 3.IESEG School of Management (LEM-CNRS)LilleFrance

Personalised recommendations