Advertisement

User-Centered Design of a Web-Based Platform for the Sustainable Development of Tourism Services in a Living Lab Context

  • Andreja Pucihar
  • Ana Malešič
  • Gregor Lenart
  • Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 7)

Abstract

The tourism sector in the Gorenjska region, where outstanding natural, historical and geographical potentials are supported by national and regional policies, still faces many challenges in terms of attracting more tourists for longer periods. We address this problem with an open innovation approach, bringing together tourism service providers, end-users (tourists), information and communication technology providers and policy makers; and with the establishing of a regional tourism living lab, which is a real life environment in which researchers, developers and users are co-creating new products or services. We describe the process and experiences of the user-centered design of the web-based platform for sustainable development of tourism services in a living lab context. The phases of the co-design process of web platform development are described, from idea formation through prototype development, testing, and gathering user feedback through several workshops. The final outcome, the “GoGorenjska” web platform, is presented, and further research is outlined. Based on the feedback from tourism service providers and tourists, we can conclude that the platform itself has vast open innovation potential, providing a critical mass of users in the phase of full production on the market.

Keywords

Living lab User-centered design Services Tourism 

References

  1. 1.
    The Official Travel Guide by Slovenian Tourist Board. http://www.slovenia.info/en/Regions/The-Gorenjska-region.htm?_ctg_regije=21&lng=2
  2. 2.
    Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Economic Development and Technology: Slovenia’s Development Strategy 2014–2020. Ministry of Economic Development and Technology, Slovenia (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malešič, A., Pucihar, A., Kljajić Borštnar, M., Lenart, G.: Opportunities for the establishment of cross-border living lab for sustainable development of eco-tourism services. In: Balantič, Z. et al. (eds.) Smart Organization: High Potentials, Lean Organization, Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Organizational Science Development, pp. 565–575. Kranj, Slovenia (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaewkitipong, L., Rotchankitumnuai, S.: The use of web 2.0 technologies in tourism industry: a conceptual model. In: CONF-IRM 2012 Proceedings, Paper 76. http://aisel.aisnet.org/confirm2012/76 (2012)
  5. 5.
    Sigala, M.: WEB 2.0 in the tourism industry: a new tourism generation and new e-business models. Eco Club 90, 5–8 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sigala, M., Christou, E., Gretzel, U.: Social media in travel, tourism and hospitality: theory, practice and cases. J. Tourism Hist. 5, 99–101 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noti, E.: Web 2.0 and the its influence in the tourism sector. Eur. Sci. J. 9(20), 115–123 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pucihar, A., Lenart, G., Malešič, A., Kljajić Borštnar, M.: Web based solution to co-create innovative eco-tourism services. In: Gornik, T. (ed.) Twenty years later: Proceedings of 20th Conference on Days of Slovenian Informatics, Portorož, 15–17 April 2013. Slovenian Society of Information Technology, Ljubljana (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liedtke, C., Welfens, Maria J., Rohn, H., Nordmann, J.: Living lab: user-driven innovation for sustainability. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 13(2), 106–118. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schaffers, H., Budweg, S., Ruland, R., Kristensen, K.: Collaborative environments to support professional communities: a living lab approach. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M. et al. (eds.) PRO-VE 2009, IFIP AICT, vol. 307, pp. 635–642. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Følstad, A.: Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review. Electron. J. Virtual Organ. Netw. 10 (Special Issue on Living Labs), 99–131 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gričar, J.: The Use of e-Technology to Develop Cross-Border e-Regions, pp. 233–239. Development Challenges in Slovenia, Slovenia (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    CoreLabs. Building Sustainable Competitiveness—Living Labs Roadmap 2007–2010. Recommendations on networked system for open user-driven research, development and innovation (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, T.-Y.: Formulate Service Innovation in Accordance with a Living-Lab Based Service Engineering Architecture. University of Miaoli, Taiwan (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van der Walt, S., Buitendag, A.K., Zaaiman, J., Vuuren, J.: Community living lab as a collaborative innovation environment. Issues Inf. Sci. Inf. Technol. ZDA 6, 421–425 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Holst, M., Ståhlbröst, A.: Concept design with a living lab approach. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.P., Kulkki, S.: State-of-the-art in utilizing living labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation—a European approach. CDT at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, Nokia Oy, Centre for Knowledge and Innovation Research at Helsinki School of Economics, Finland (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ståhlbröst, A.: Forming Future IT—The Living Lab Way of User Involvement, pp. 30–40. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: Living labs and open innovation: roles and applicability. Electron. J. Virtual Organ. Netw. 10, 21–46 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schuurman, D., Lievens, B., De Marez, L., Ballon, P.: Innovation from user experience in living labs: revisiting the ‘innovation factory’-concept with a panel-based and user-centered approach. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), United Kingdom (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kochan, A.: Rapid Prototyping Gains Speed, Volume and Precision. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baek, E.O., Cagiltay, K., Boling, E., Frick, T.: User-centered design and development. In: Spector, M.J. et al. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: A Project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 659–670. State University San Bernardino, California (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thimbleby, H.: Understanding user centred design (UCD) for people with special needs. In: Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5105, pp. 1–17 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chesbrough, H.W.: The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 44(3), 35–41 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreja Pucihar
    • 1
  • Ana Malešič
    • 1
  • Gregor Lenart
    • 1
  • Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Organizational SciencesUniversity of MariborKranjSlovenia

Personalised recommendations