Understanding User Visiting Behavior and Web Design: Applying Simultaneous Choice Model to Content Arrangement

  • Lianlian Song
  • Geoffrey Tso
  • Zhiyong Liu
  • Qian Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 7)


A common problem encountered in web design is how to arrange content on the homepage of a website. This paper uses a random-utility theory in studying visitors’ choice behaviors to optimize web design. Classical discrete choice models are not suitable. A total of six multiple-choice demand models are proposed in this paper. These models are applied to web log file data collected from an educational institute over a seven and a half month period, and the parameters are estimated consistently across all models. The best model based on the forecasting accuracy rate is selected as the tool for resolving the problem of web design. Two metrics, utility loss and compensating time, are constructed using the selected utility model to facilitate web design. Empirical results show that the proposed metrics are highly efficient to develop web design to resolve the problem of how to allocate the information resources of a website, and the algorithms can also be utilized to assist the study of the feasibility of introducing a new function in a website.


Web design Random utility theory Web log file Utility loss 


  1. 1.
    Aaker, D.: Managing Brand Equity: Capitalising on the Value of a Brand Name. Free Press, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, S.C., Dhillon, G.S.: Interpreting dimensions of consumer trust in e-commerce. Inf. Manage. Technol. 4, 303–318 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jaeki, S., Fatemeh, Z.: A theoretical approach to web design in e-commerce: a belief reinforcement model. Manage. Sci. 51(8), 1219–1235 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, C.M., Lee, H.M., Chang, Y.J.: Two novel feature selection approaches for web page classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 260–272 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, Y.E., Lee, A.J.T.: Mining web navigation patterns with a path traversal graph. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 7112–7122 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao, L., Zhang, S.Z., Fan, X.F.: Web browsing feature mining of an anonymous user. J. Comput. Res. Dev. 39(12), 1759–1763 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erdem, T., Keane, M.P., Sun, B.: A dynamic model of brand choice when price and advertising signal product quality. Mark. Sci. 27(6), 1111–1125 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhat, C.R.: The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Transp. Res. Part B 42, 274–303 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niedrich, R.W., Weathers, D., Hill, R.C., Bell, D.R.: Specifying price judgments with range-frequency theory in models of brand choice. J. Mark. Res. 46(5), 693–702 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, J.H., Allenby, G.M., Rossi, P.E.: Modeling consumer demand for variety. Mark. Sci. 21(3), 229–250 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhat, C.R.: A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transp. Res. Part B 39, 679–707 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lianlian Song
    • 1
  • Geoffrey Tso
    • 2
  • Zhiyong Liu
    • 1
  • Qian Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.USTC-CityU Joint Advanced Research CenterSuzhouChina
  2. 2.City University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations